Advertisement

Using Art-Based Techniques in Faculty Training Programmes

  • Mohammed Saleh Alkathiri
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of faculty members relating to the use of art-based techniques (i.e. sketching, drawing, graphic design, and lyric writing) in faculty training programmes at a university in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Ten participants were enrolled in a professional training workshop that was designed to enhance their teaching skills. The researcher argued that it was necessary to investigate the perceptions of faculty members held concerning the use of art-based techniques. From there, the researcher could assess the impact of adopting these approaches in professional training programmes. The study used a qualitative approach with multiple data collection methods that included observation, semi-structured interviews, member checking, and examination of participant artefacts. Findings revealed several common themes regarding the opportunities and issues that faculty members perceived with respect to using art-based techniques in professional training programmes. Recommendations for future research and implications for practice were offered.

Keywords

Art-based techniques Faculty members Teaching skills Professional development Academic training programmes 

References

  1. Al-Hattami, A.A., O.M. Muammar, and E.A. Elmahdi. 2013. The Need for Professional Training Programmes to Improve Faculty Members Teaching Skills. European Journal of Research on Education 1 (2): 39–45.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, A.E. 2002. Creating a Bridge to the Future: Preparing New Faculty to Face Changing Expectations in a Shifting Context. The Review of Higher Education 26: 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, A.E., and M. McDaniels. 2006. Preparing the Professoriate of the Future: Graduate Student Socialization for Faculty Roles. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Practice, ed. Smart J.C., 21: 397–456. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, A.E., and M.D. Sorcinelli. 2013. The Future of Faculty Development: Where are We Going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning 133: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barone, T., and E.W. Eisner. 2012. Arts Based Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bieber, J.P., and L.K. Worley. 2006. Conceptualizing the Academic Life: Graduate Students’ Perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education 77: 1009–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J.W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions, 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cullingford, C. 2002. Institutional Development and Professional Needs: Some Reflections. In Professional Development and Institutional Needs, ed. G. Trorey, and C. Cullingford, 223–235. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, B. 2009. Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2005. Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 1–32. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Elmahdi, I., O. Muammar, and A. Al-Hattami. 2015. The Effect of a Core Competencies Training Programme on Faculty Members’ Teaching Performance. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations 3: 79–86.Google Scholar
  14. Finelli, C.J., M. Ott, A.C. Gottfried, C. Hershock, C. O’Neal, and M. Kaplan. 2008. Utilizing Instructional Consultations to Enhance the Teaching Performance of Engineering Faculty. Journal of Engineering Education 97: 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finley, S. 2011. Critical Arts-Based Inquiry. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 435–450. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, T. 2014. Scholarly Traditions and the Role of the Professoriate in Uncertain Times. Journal of Educational Administration and History 46: 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher, J.J., and S.K. Patrick. 1998. Not Just Workshops Any More: The Role of Faculty Development in Reframing Academic Priorities. International Journal for Academic Development 3 (1): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fusch, P., and L. Ness. 2015. Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report 20: 1408–1416.Google Scholar
  19. Gappa, J.M., A.E. Austin, and A.G. Trice. 2007. Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education’s Strategic Imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs, G., and M. Coffey. 2004. The Impact of Training of University Teachers on Their Teaching Skills, Their Approach to Teaching and Their Approach to Learning of Their Students. Active Learning in Higher Education 5: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillespie, K.J., and D.L. Robertson. 2010. A Guide to Faculty Development, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Glesne, C. 2011. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Hervey, L.W. 2004. Artistic Inquiry in Dance/Movement Therapy. In Dance/Movement Therapists in Action: A Working Guide to Research Options, ed. R.F. Cruz, and C.F. Berrol, 181–205. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  24. Hodgson, C.S., and L. Wilkerson. 2014. Faculty Development for Teaching Improvement. In Faculty Development in the Health Professions: A Focus on Research and Practice, ed. Yvonne Steinert, 24–52. Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Kamel, A.M. 2016. Role of Faculty Development Programmes in Improving Teaching and Learning. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences 3: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kapitan, L. 2010. Introduction to Art Therapy Research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kolb, D.A., R.E. Boyatzis, and C. Mainemelis. 2001. Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions. In Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, ed. R.J. Sternberg, and L.F. Zhang, 227–247. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Ladkin, D., and S. Taylor. 2010. Leadership as Art: Variations on a Theme. Leadership 6 (3): 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langer, S. 1953. Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art. New York, NY: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  30. Leavy, P. 2009. Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, V.S. 2010. Programme Types and Prototypes. In A Guide to Faculty Development, ed. L.J. Gillespie, and D.L. Robertson, 21–33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Maxwell, J.A. 2005. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. McNiff, S. 1998. Art-Based Research. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  34. McNiff, S. 2013. Art as Research: Opportunities and Challenges. Bristol, UK: Intellect.Google Scholar
  35. Merriam, S.B., R.S. Caffarella, and L.M. Baumgartner. 2007. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  36. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). 1997. Higher Education and the Learning Society: The Dearing Report. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  37. Nissley, N. 2010. Arts-Based Learning at Work: Economic Downturns, Innovation Upturns, and the Eminent Practicality of Arts in Business. Journal of Business Strategy 31: 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Meara, K. A., A. L. P. Terosky, and A. Neumann. 2008. Faculty Careers and Work Lives: A Professional Growth Perspective. ASHE Higher Education Report 34 (3). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  39. Ouellett, M.L. 2010. Overview of Faculty Development: History and Choices. In A Guide to Faculty Development, ed. K.J. Gillespie, and D.L. Robertson, 3–21. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Patteson, A., J. Restoule, I. Margolin, and M. Conely de Leon. 2010. Arts-Based Teaching and Learning as an Alternative Approach for Aboriginal Learners and Their Teachers. Canadian Council on Learning, 1–110. http://en.copian.ca/library/research/ccl/arts_based_teaching/arts_based_teaching.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2017.
  41. Perry, M., N. Maffulli, S. Willson, and D. Morrissey. 2011. The Effectiveness of Arts-Based Interventions in Medical Education: A Literature Review. Medical Education 45: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Yla¨nne, and A. Nevgi. 2007. The Effect of Pedagogical Training on Teaching in Higher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 557–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi. 2008. A Follow-Up Study of the Effect of Pedagogical Training on Teaching in Higher Education. Higher Education 56: 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rieger, K.L., and W.M. Chernomas. 2013. Arts-Based Learning: Analysis of the Concept for Nursing Education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 10 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Romero, A. 2014. On Being a Professor: The Challenges to Today and Tomorrow. Polymath: An Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Journal 4 (2): 1–3.Google Scholar
  46. Savin-Baden, M., and K. Wimpenny. 2014. A Practical Guide to Arts-related Research. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schuster, J.H., and M.J. Finkelstein. 2006. The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, D., and M. Morrison. 2006. Key Ideas in Educational Research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  49. Sorcinelli, M.D. 1994. Effective Approaches to New Faculty Development. Journal of Counseling and Development 72: 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sorcinelli, M.D., A.E. Austin, P.L. Eddy, and A.L. Beach. 2006. Creating the Future of Faculty Development: Learning from the Past, Understanding the Present. Bolton, MA: Anker.Google Scholar
  51. Steinert, Y. 2000. Faculty Development in the New Millennium: Key Challenges and Future Directions. Medical Teacher 22: 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinert, Y., K. Mann, A. Centeno, D. Dolmans, J. Spencer, M. Gelula, and D. Prideaux. 2006. A Systematic Review of Faculty Development Initiatives Designed to Improve Teaching Effectiveness in Medical Education: BEME Guide No 8. Medical Teacher 28: 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DammamDammamSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations