Public Administration for the Next Generation

  • Peter WinstanleyEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 32)


Public Administration incorporates the development of statutes and regulations to bring order and control to aspects of society. In democratic societies this is accompanied by gathering opinion from the population on the span and degree of this control and on some of the details. This essay explores ways in which developments in digital technologies can facilitate this process, aid policymakers in ensuring consistency of regulations, and streamline the process between regulation and software in situations where this is relevant and helpful. It looks forward to what the coming generation of citizens might expect from their public administrators.


  1. Amazon Web Services (2015) Lambda architecture for batch and stream processing on AWS. Available at
  2. Australian Government Department of Health (2016) Regulation and red tape reduction. Available at
  3. Beach T, Rezgui Y, Li H, Kasim T (2015) A rule-based semantic approach for automated regulatory compliance in the construction sector. Expert Syst Appl 42(12):5219–5231. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennet S (2015) Using design and open policy making techniques to address complex problems. In UK government “Future of Aging” blog. Available at
  5. Bergsson BT, Blokker P (2014) The constitutional experiment in Iceland (September 4, 2013). In: Pocza K (ed) Verfassunggebung in kon-solidierten Demokratien: Neubeginn oder Verfall eines Systems? Nomos Verlag. ISBN 3848709996. Available at SSRN:
  6. Blokker P (2012) Grassroots constitutional politics in Iceland. Available at
  7. Brodie CA, Karat C-M, Karat J (2006) An empirical study of natural language parsing of privacy policy rules using the SPARCLE policy workbench. Symposium on usable privacy and security (SOUPS). Available at
  8. Carnegie Mellon University, Scott Institute for Energy Innovation, Technology Guide. (2014) Innovative energy technologies: the next generation. Available at
  9. Chilean Government (2016) Chile Atiende. Available at
  10. Cognitum (2016) The Fluent Editor website. Available at
  11. Compendium Institute (2012) Website available at
  12. ConceptNet 5 Website (2012) available at
  13. DeLong JV (2002) Out of bounds, out of control: regulatory enforcement at the EPA. Cato InstituteGoogle Scholar
  14. GLEIF – Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (2016) Website available at
  15. IBM (2016) IBM Debating Technologies website. Available at
  16. Iceland Review Online (2010, 2014) Iceland election results announced. Available at
  17. Integrated Method for Policy making using Argument modelling and Computer assisted Text analysis (2012) Project site available at
  18. Lemman N (2008) Conflict of interests. The New Yorker. Available at
  19. LIME – CIRSFID, University of Bologna (2016) LIME: the Language Independent Markup Editor website. Available at
  20. Linked Open Vocabularies (2016) Website available at
  21. Lotzmann U, Meyer R (2011) DRAMS – a declarative rule-based agent modelling system. In: Burczynski T, Kolodziej J, Byrski A, Carvalho M (eds) Proceedings 25th European conference on modelling and simulation. ©ECMS ISBN: 978-0-9564944-2-9 / ISBN: 978-0-9564944-3-6 (CD)Google Scholar
  22. Manuel T (2015) The content corner: using natural language processing to improve rulemaking. DigitalGov website. Available at
  23. Maple C (2014) Supporting a business rules approach with standards and patterns. Bus Rules J 15(9). Available at
  24. McGibbney LJ, Kumar B (2013) A comperative study to determine a suitable representional data model for UK building relations. J Inf Technol Constr (ITcon) 18:20–39. Google Scholar
  25. Mikoleit A (2014) Social media use by governments: a policy primer to discuss trends, identify policy opportunities and guide decision makers. OECD working papers on public governance no. 26. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  26. Moss G, Kennedy HN, Moshonas S, Birchall C (2015) Knowing your publics: the use of social media analytics in local government. Information Polity 20(4):287–298. ISSN 1570-1255. Available at CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. New Zealand Law Commission (2012) R125 the public’s right to know. Available at
  28. OASIS (2016) LegalRuleML Technical Committee website. Available at
  29. Object Management Group (2015) Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules™ (SBVR™) website. Available at
  30. OCOPOMO Project (2012) Open collaboration for policy modelling website. Available at
  31. OpenCharities (2016) Website available at
  32. OpenCorporates (2016) Website available at
  33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016a) Regulatory policy. Available at
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016b) Regulatory impact analysis. Available at
  35. Paschke A, Boley H (2009) Rule markup languages and semantic web rule languages. In: Giurca A, Gasevic D, Taveter K (eds) Handbook of research on emerging rule-based languages and technologies: open solutions and approaches. Chapter: 1. IGI Global, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  36. Patient Opinion website (2016) Available at
  37. Pedersen S, Baxter G, Burnett S, Goker A, Corney D, Martin C (2014) Backchannel chat: peaks and troughs in a twitter response to three televised debates during the Scottish independence referendum campaign 2014. Aberdeen Business School Working Paper Series 7(2). Available at
  38. Policy Compass (2016) Project website available at
  39. Power R, Scott D (1998) WYSIWYM: knowledge editing with natural language feedback. Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on natural language generation (INLG 98), Niagara-on-the-LakeGoogle Scholar
  40. ROSS (2016) Website available at
  41. RuleSpeak (2016) Website available at
  42. Seganti A, Kapłański P, Zarzycki P (2016) Collaborative editing of ontologies using fluent editor and Ontorion. In: 12th international experiences and directions workshop on OWL, OWLED 2015, co-located with ISWC 2015, Bethlehem, 9–10 Oct 2015, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  43. Stoddart A (2014) Collaborative government in Scotland. Available at
  44. Taieb D (2016) Real-time sentiment analysis of twitter hashtags with spark. IBM cloud data services developer center. Available at
  45. U.S.C. § 553(c) (2006) ([The agency shall incorporate in the rules adopted a concise general statement of their basis and purpose.). Quoted in Kevin M. Stack (2012) Interpreting regulations. Mich Law Rev 111(3):355–422. available at
  46. UK Government (2014) Regulatory impact assessments: guidance for government departments. Available at
  47. UK Government Digital Service (2016) Digital People blog website. Available at
  48. Wikipedia (2016a) Northcote–Trevelyan report. Available at
  49. Wikipedia (2016b) Issue-based information system. Available at
  50. Wikipedia (2016c) Icelandic constitutional reform, 2010–13. Available at,_2010%E2%80%9313

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semantechs Consulting LimitedGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations