Skip to main content

Bitter Challenge; Swede Success: Simulating Language Learning Experiences in Social Studies Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 572 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes a simulation social studies activity teacher educators (TEs) can use in their methods courses or to facilitate professional development to P/ISTs (preservice and in-service teachers). The simulation itself demonstrates that effective English language learning can take place within content-specific classrooms without “dumbing down” the curriculum. To explain the simulations effect, we utilize theories of enacted learning and the interactive role that orientations, goals, and resources play in supporting or disrupting effective teaching practices. We conclude this chapter by offering suggestions on how to further develop P/IST understanding and practice with effective language development strategies such that they can improve their own teaching of social studies in ways that respond to a growing body of students in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    While there is little question that the use of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol has been demonstrated as an effective intervention for improving student’s language learning, there is some contention regarding the degree to which this model is empirically validated (Krashen, 2013) and whether the protocol has sufficient factorial validity (Polat & Cepik, 2016). Nevertheless, it is, to our knowledge, most effective and widely disseminated model of language learning currently in use.

  2. 2.

    Please note that the italicized text is spoken in Swedish during the course of the lesson.

References

  • Aper, L., Reniers, J., Koole, S., Valcke, M., & Derese, A. (2012). Impact of three alternative consultation training formats on self-efficacy and consultation skills of medical students. Medical Teacher, 34(7), 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, D. A., & Kiger, G. (1990). The effect of a prejudice-reduction simulation on attitude change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00415.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady, M., Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2011). From preservice to practice: Mainstream elementary teacher beliefs of preparation and efficacy with English language learners in the state of Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.597823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, B. C., Nutta, J. W., O’Brien, J., Feyten, C. M., & Govoni, J. M. (2003). Passport to learning. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, B. C., & Thornton, S. J. (2009a). Social studies for English language learners: Teaching social studies that matters. Social Education, 73(6), 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, B. C., & Thornton, S. J. (2009b). Teaching social studies to English language learners. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, E. J., & Harper, C. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English-language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2), 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, L. (2006). An unforgettable lesson. New Scientist, 192(2581), 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, T. W., & Menke, M. (2010). Struggling learners and language immersion education: Research-based, practitioner-informed responses to educators’ top questions. (CARLA publication series). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzler, L. M. (2010). Simulated citizen: How students experienced a semester length legislative simulation (Doctoral dissertation). Accession order no. 3448866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., et al. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 894–914. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P. (2015). Scaffolding language scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, D., Andrusyszyn, M., & Iwaslw, C. (2005). The effect of classroom simulation on nursing students’ self-efficacy related to health teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(7), 310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. R., Boyer, M. A., & Brown, S. W. (2011). Vital interests: Cultivating global competence in the international studies classroom. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Designing training and peer coaching: Our need for learning. In B. Joyce & B. Showers (Eds.), Student achievement through staff development (pp. 69–94). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameg, K., Howard, V. M., Clochesy, J., Mitchell, A. M., & Suresky, J. M. (2010). The impact of high fidelity human simulation on self-efficacy of communication skills. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(5), 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (2013). Does SIOP research support SIOP claims? Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, J. C., & Smarick, K. J. (2006). Simulating a senate office: The impact on student knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160600668967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T., Howard, E., & Moss, D. (2014). Preparing classroom teachers to succeed with second language learners: Lessons from a faculty learning community. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitles, H., & McKelvie, E. (2010). “Why does wearing a yellow bib make us different?”: A case study of explaining discrimination in a west of Scotland secondary (high) school. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, M. P., & Jacobs, B. M. (2009). The modeling approach to social studies teacher education. In E. E. Heilman, R. Fruja, & M. T. Missias (Eds.), Social studies and diversity education: What we do and why we do it (pp. 320–323). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, C.). Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. [Original publication, 1962].

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., Self, N., Garven, S., & Allen, N. (2011). Leader challenge: What would you do? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Lane, J. (2006). Constructive disagreement, the body, and education for democracy. The Social Studies, 97(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2013). Washington State K-12 Social Studies Learning Standards, (version 2.1). Olympia, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, S. K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about English language learners in the mainstream classroom: A review of the literature. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5, 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2011.594357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polat, N., & Cepik, S. (2016). An exploratory factor analysis of the sheltered instruction observation protocol as an evaluation tool to measure teaching effectiveness. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 817–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. K. (2012). Modeling powerful social studies: Bridging theory and practice with preservice elementary teachers. The Social Studies, 103(3), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweber, S. A. (2004). Making sense of the Holocaust: Lessons from classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. C. (2011). Modeling the model: The use of classroom talk in teaching socioconstructivist pedagogy in a social studies teacher education setting. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(2), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompson, G. H., & Dass, P. (2000). Improving students’ self-efficacy in strategic management: The relative impact of cases and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, G. N. (2008). Alone, confused, and frustrated: Developing empathy and strategies for working with English language learners. The Clearing House, 81(6), 247–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. W., & Bradley, J. F. (2009). Modeling secondary instructional strategies in a teacher education class. Education, 130(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. E. (2015). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Maley, C. (2015). What every social studies teacher should know about simulations. Canadian Social Studies, 48(1), 8–23. Accessible from http://www.educ.ualberta.ca/css/481/2WhatEveryTeacherFINAL.pdf

  • Wright-Maley, C., & Green, J. D. (2015). Experiencing the needs and challenges of ELLs: Improving knowledge and efficacy of preservice teachers through the use of a language immersion simulation. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2015.1030176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright-Maley, C., Levine, T., & Gonzalez, E. (2014). Instruction in progress: In search of effective practices for emergent bilinguals. In T. Levine, L. Howard, & D. Moss (Eds.), Preparing classroom teachers to succeed with second language learners (pp. 154–173). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, P. J., Kibler, A., & van Hover, S. (2016). Instruction for English language learners in the social studies classroom: A meta-synthesis. Social Studies Research & Practice, 11(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwiers, J. (2014). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wright-Maley, C., Green, J.D. (2018). Bitter Challenge; Swede Success: Simulating Language Learning Experiences in Social Studies Classrooms. In: de Oliveira, L., Obenchain, K. (eds) Teaching History and Social Studies to English Language Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63736-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63736-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63735-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63736-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics