Skip to main content

Comparison Between Theoretical and Practical Compression Capacities of Deep/Long Piles in Dubai

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017) (ISBS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 6))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1971 Accesses

Abstract

The rate of build high-rise buildings has accelerated rapidly over the last few decades, due to rapid urbanization and significant improvements in the field of the high-rise construction and technology. Many challenges were faced by the engineers in the design and construction of such buildings. One of the major challenges was the foundation systems, which are required to ensure the stability of the buildings. The common type of foundation system which is used in case of high-rise buildings is piles foundation system. Furthermore, in the most standards and codes of practice such as British Standard, the piles specifications and recommendations are stated for short piles which has a maximum depth range between 18.0 and 20.0 m. As well as, the theoretical equations for pile design, charts and different soil factors and parameters are based on old studies of short piles behavior. In this research, a comparison was conducted between the theoretical pile compression capacity which is calculated from the theoretical equations and the practical pile compression capacity which is derived from the results of pile’s static load test. The study covered three different cases of bored piles constructed in U.A.E. especially in Dubai. The piles used in this research have a depth ranging from 30.0 to 65.0 m. This type of piles is classified in this research as long or deep piles. A finite element model of each participated pile modeled by using PLAXIS 2D software, to judge between the practical and theoretical piles capacities. It was found that the theoretical compression pile capacity is 60–70% of the practical pile capacity with the same specifications (pile diameter and pile depth). As a conclusion of the results, the estimated piles diameter and depth in the concept design stage can be improved based on the results of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tomlinson M, Woodward J (2008) Pile design and construction practice, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brinkgreve R, Broere W, Al-Khoury R (2004) PLAXIS: 2D, version 8, 1st edn. Balkema, Lisse

    Google Scholar 

  3. British standard code of practice for foundations (1986) 1st edn. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowles J (1977) Foundation analysis and design, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hobbs NB (1975) Review paper—Rocks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Settlement of Structures. British Geotechnical Society, Pentech Press, pp 579–610

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horvarth RG (1978) Field load test data on concrete-to-rock bond strength for drilled pier foundations, Publication: University of Toronto, no 78–07

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1980) Design of foundations on discontinuous rock. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Foundations on Rock, vol 1. Sydney, pp 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1987) Foundations in rock. In: Bell FG (ed) Ground Engineering Reference Book, chap 15. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liang R, Zhang F (2010) Deep foundations and geotechnical in situ testing, 1st edn. ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poulos H, Davis E (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenberg P, Journeaux NL (1976) Friction and end bearing tests on bedrock for high capacity socket design. Canadian Geotech J 13:324–333

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vesic AS (1970) Tests on instrumented piles, Ogeechee River site. J Soil Mech Found Div, Am Soc Civ Eng 96(SM2)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams AF, Pells PJN (1981) Side resistance rock sockets in sandstone, mudstone, and shale. Canadian Geotech J 18(4):502–513

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wyllie DC (1991) Foundations on Rock. E & FN Spon, 1st edn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Nabil Omar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Omar, M.N., Tair, A.A. (2018). Comparison Between Theoretical and Practical Compression Capacities of Deep/Long Piles in Dubai. In: Fırat, S., Kinuthia, J., Abu-Tair, A. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017). ISBS 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63709-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics