The Popularity of Pension and Unemployment Policies Revisited: The Erosion of Public Support in Britain and Germany



This chapter provides a comparative analysis of the long-term development of public attitudes towards pension and unemployment policies in Great Britain and Germany (1985–2013). The British and German welfare states are still rather popular. Public support for government responsibility for the elderly is stronger than for the unemployed. Moreover, a trade-off in expenditure preferences favours spending on pensions over spending on unemployment benefits. Claims toward an increased polarization between generations, union/non-union members and left/right supporters seem overblown. Welfare reforms have not led to a counter-reaction but the continued reform pressures have led to a partial erosion of public welfare state support.


  1. Alesina, A., and E.L. Glaeser. 2004. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe. A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreß, H., and T. Heien. 2001. Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review 17 (4): 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armingeon, K., L. Knöpfel, D. Weisstanner, and S. Engler. 2014. Comparative political data set I. Berne: Institute of Political Science.Google Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones. 2002. Policy dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bendz, A. 2015. Paying attention to politics. Public responsiveness and welfare policy change. Policy Studies Journal 43 (3): 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blekesaune, M. 2007. Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review 23 (3): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blom, A., C. Gathmann, and U. Krieger. 2015. Setting up an online panel representative of the general population. The German internet panel. Field Methods 27 (4): 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonoli, G. 2003. Two worlds of pension reform in Western Europe. Comparative Politics 35: 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, C., and J. Manza. 2008. Why welfare states persist. The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Busemeyer, M.R., A. Goerres, and S. Weschle. 2009. Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing. The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (3): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clasen, J. 2005. Reforming European welfare states. Germany and the United Kingdom compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clasen, J., and D. Clegg. 2011. Regulating the risk of unemployment. national adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahl, R.A. 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. DiMaggio, P., J. Evans, and B. Bryson. 1996. Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology 102 (3): 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dingeldey, I. 2011. Der aktivierende Wohlfahrtsstaat. Governance der Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Dänemark, Großbritannien und Deutschland. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  16. Easton, D. 1957. An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics 9 (3): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebbinghaus, B., ed. 2011. Varieties of pension governance. The privatization of pensions in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2015. The privatization and marketization of pensions in Europe. A double transformation facing the crisis. European Policy Analysis 1 (1): 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emery, T. 2012. Intergenerational conflict. Evidence from Europe. Journal of Population Ageing 5 (1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GESIS. 2013. German general social survey (ALLBUS). Cumulation 1980–2010. Cologne: Data Archive.Google Scholar
  21. Giger, N., and M. Nelson. 2011. The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment. Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research 50 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glatzer, W., R. Bieräugel, O. Nüchter, and A. Schmid. 2010. Attitudes towards the welfare state. 2005–2007–2008. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.Google Scholar
  23. Hacker, J.S., and P. Pierson. 2014. After the “master theory”. Downs, Schattschneider, and the rebirth of policy-focused analysis. Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hacker, J.S., P. Rehm, and M. Schlesinger. 2013. The insecure American. Economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes. Perspectives on Politics 11 (1): 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hemerijck, A. 2013. Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hinrichs, K. 2000. Elephants on the move. Patterns of public pension reform in OECD countries. European Review 8 (3): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ISSP Research Group. 2008. International social survey programme. Role of government I–IV. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.Google Scholar
  28. Iversen, T., and D. Soskice. 2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–893.Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenworthy, L., and L. McCall. 2008. Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review 6 (1): 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korpi, W. 1983. The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Kumlin, S. 2007. The welfare state. Values, policy preferences, and performance evaluations. In Oxford handbook of political behavior, ed. R. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kumlin, S., and I. Stadelmann-Steffen, eds. 2014. How welfare states shape the democratic public. Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Leisering, L. 2011. The new regulatory state. Regulating pensions in Germany and the UK. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lipsmeyer, C.S. 2003. Welfare and the discriminating public. Evaluating entitlement attitudes in post-communist Europe. Policy Studies Journal 31 (4): 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Margalit, Y. 2013. Explaining social policy preferences. Evidence from the great recession. American Political Science Review 107 (1): 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marx, P. 2014. Labour market risks and political preferences. The case of temporary employment. European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mau, S. 2004. The moral economy of welfare states. Britain and Germany compared. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Myles, J., and P. Pierson. 2001. The comparative political economy of pension reform. In The new politics of the welfare state, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. National Center for Social Research. 2013. British social attitudes survey. 1985–2013. Essex: UK Data Archive.Google Scholar
  42. Naumann, E. 2014. Raising the retirement age. Retrenchment, feedback and attitudes. In How welfare states shape the democratic public. Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes, ed. S. Kumlin and I. Stadelmann-Steffen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Palier, B., ed. 2010. A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in Western Europe. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pierson, P. 1993. When effect becomes cause. Policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———., ed. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rehm, P., J.S. Hacker, and M. Schlesinger. 2012. Insecure alliances. Risk, inequality, and support for the welfare state. American Political Science Review 106 (2): 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roller, E. 1992. Einstellungen der Bürger zum Wohlfahrtsstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roosma, F., J. Gelissen, and W. van Oorschot. 2013. The multidimensionality of welfare state attitudes. Social Indicators Research 113 (1): 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scruggs, L. 2007. Welfare state generosity across time and space. In Investigating welfare state change, ed. J. Clasen and N.A. Siegel. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Soroka, S.N., and C. Wlezien. 2009. Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Streeck, W., and K.A. Thelen. 2005. Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Svallfors, S. 2004. Class, attitudes and the welfare state. Sweden in comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ———. 2010. Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention. Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor-Gooby, P. 2011. Does risk society erode welfare state solidarity? Policy & Politics 39 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ullrich, C.G. 2000. Die soziale Akzeptanz des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Ergebnisse, Kritik und Perspektiven einer Forschungsrichtung. Soziale Welt 51: 131–151.Google Scholar
  57. van Kersbergen, K., and B. Vis. 2013. Comparative welfare state politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Oorschot, W. 2000. Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics 28 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Oorschot, W., and B. Meuleman. 2014. Popular deservingness of the unemployed in the context of welfare state policies, economic conditions and cultural climate. In How welfare states shape the democratic public. Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes, ed. S. Kumlin and I. Stadelmann-Steffen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Vanhuysse, P. 2006. Divide and pacify. Strategic social policies and political protests in post-communist democracies. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Weaver, R.K. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weishaupt, T. 2013. Origin and genesis of activation policies in old Europe. In Minimum income protection in flux, ed. I. Marx and K. Nelson. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Wlezien, C. 1995. The public as thermostat. Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Policy and InterventionUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations