Advertisement

Demand for Healthcare Reform by Public Opinion and Medical Professionals: A Comparative Survey Analysis

  • Claus Wendt
  • Elias Naumann
Chapter

Abstract

To cope with rising healthcare costs, healthcare systems in advanced welfare states are undergoing quite significant changes including privatization and the introduction of private co-payments. This chapter argues that public opinion and doctors’ preferences are key to understand the reform potential of healthcare systems. It provides an empirical study of public and doctors’ satisfaction with the existing healthcare system in 11 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the Unites States). The study shows that doctors are less status quo oriented than the public. It seems that not medical professionals but rather the public is a potential veto player blocking reforms. The Netherlands and Britain are the countries with the lowest level of reform demand, possibly because they have experienced a long period of large-scale health reforms. The USA represents the other extreme with widespread reform demand.

References

  1. Bleich, S.N., E. Özaltin, and C.J.L. Murray. 2009. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87 (4): 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blekesaune, M., and J. Quadagno. 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blendon, R.J., C. Schoen, C. DesRoches, R. Osborn, and K. Zapert. 2003. Common concerns amid diverse systems. Health care experiences in five countries. Health Affairs 22 (3): 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calnan, M.W., and E. Sanford. 2004. Public trust in health care. The system or the doctor? Quality and Safety in Health Care 13 (2): 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, G. 1996. Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. Social Science & Medicine 42 (7): 1085–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. European Observatory. 2017. The health systems and policy monitor. Accessed 28 March 2017. http://hspm.org/
  8. Footman, K., B. Roberts, A. Mills, E. Richardson, and M. McKee. 2013. Public satisfaction as a measure of health system performance. A study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union. Health Policy 112 (1): 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman, R., and M. Moran. 2000. Reforming health care in Europe. West European Politics 23 (2): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geissler, A., W. Quentin, D. Scheller-Kreinsen, and R. Busse. 2011. Introduction to DRGs in Europe. Common objectives across different hospital systems. In Diagnosis-related groups in Europe. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals, ed. R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, and M. Wiley. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gevers, J., J. Gelissen, W. Arts, and R. Muffels. 2000. Public health care in the balance. Exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare 9 (4): 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giaimo, S., and P. Manow. 1999. Adapting the welfare state. The case of health care reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Comparative Political Studies 32 (8): 967–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, J.A., and M.C. Dornan. 1990. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care. A meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine 30 (7): 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall, J.A., D.L. Roter, and N.R. Katz. 1988. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Medical Care 26 (7): 657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Immergut, E.M. 1990. Institutions, veto points, and policy results. A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy 10 (4): 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, M.K., R.J. Blendon, and J.M. Benson. 2013. What is driving people’s dissatisfaction with their own health care in 17 Latin American countries? Health Expectations 16 (2): 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohl, J., and C. Wendt. 2004. Satisfaction with health care systems. In Challenges for quality of life in the contemporary world. Advances in quality-of-life studies, theory and research, ed. W. Glatzer, S. Below, and M. Stoffregen. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Levy, J.D. 1999. Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe. Politics & Society 27 (2): 239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malat, J. 2001. Social distance and patients’ rating of healthcare providers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42 (4): 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manow, P. 2001. Comparative institutional advantages of welfare state regimes and new coalitions in welfare state reforms. In the new politics of the welfare state, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Missinne, S., B. Meuleman, and P. Bracke. 2013. The popular legitimacy of European healthcare systems. A multilevel analysis of 24 countries. Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mossialos, E. 1997. Citizens’ views on health care systems in the 15 member states of the European Union. Health Economics 6 (2): 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Munro, N., and J. Duckett. 2015. Explaining public satisfaction with health-care systems. Findings from a nationwide survey in China. Health Expectations 19 (3): 654–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. 2016. OECD health statistics. Accessed 28 March 2017. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_REAC
  25. Papadakis, E., and C. Bean. 1993. Popular support for the welfare state. A comparison between institutional regimes. Journal of Public Policy 13 (3): 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Papanicolas, I., J. Cylus, and P.C. Smith. 2013a. An analysis of survey data from eleven countries finds that ‘satisfaction’ with health system performance means many things. Health Affairs 32 (4): 734–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Papanicolas, I., D. Kringos, N.S. Klazinga, and P.C. Smith. 2013b. Health system performance comparison. New directions in research and policy. Health Policy 112 (1): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierson, P., ed. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Quadagno, J. 2006. One nation, uninsured. Why the US has no national health insurance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reibling, N. 2010. Healthcare systems in Europe. Towards an incorporation of patient access. Journal of European Social Policy 20 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothgang, H., M. Cacace, L. Frisina, S. Grimmeisen, A. Schmid, and C. Wendt, eds. 2010. The state and healthcare. Comparing OECD countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Rothstein, B. 2001. The universal welfare state as a social dilemma. Rationality and Society 13 (2): 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoen, C., R. Osborn, D. Squires, M. Doty, P. Rasmussen, R. Pierson, and S. Applebaum. 2012. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Affairs 31 (12): 2805–2816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steinmo, S., and J. Watts. 1995. ‘It’s the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive national health insurance always fails in America. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20 (2): 329–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wendt, C., and J. Kohl. 2010. Translating monetary inputs into health care provision. A comparative analysis of the impact of different modes of public policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 12 (1–2): 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wendt, C., J. Kohl, M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2010. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Wendt
    • 1
  • Elias Naumann
    • 2
  1. 1.Seminar für SozialwissenschaftenUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  2. 2.SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations