Class, Union, or Party Allegiance? Comparing Pension Reform Preferences in Britain and Germany



This chapter explores to what degree public opinion, particularly specific social groups including social classes, retirees, members of trade unions, and supporters of political parties, defend the status quo or are willing to support reforms. It distinguishes two major dimensions of pension-specific attitudes, retrenchment and redistribution. Using data from the 2008 European Social Survey, the study compares two countries with different pension systems, organized interests, and party systems: Britain and Germany. Our results show pronounced cross-national differences in attitudes towards the redistributive character of the pensions system but less variation with regard to retrenchment of pension benefits. Political affiliations show also more variation than social classes, indicating that ideological alignment is more pronounced than social class.


  1. Alber, J. 1984. Versorgungsklassen im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 36: 225–251.Google Scholar
  2. Andreß, H., and T. Heien. 2001. Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review 17 (4): 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arts, W., and J. Gelissen. 2001. Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles. Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica 44 (4): 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blekesaune, M., and J. Quadagno. 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonoli, G., and D. Natali, eds. 2012. The politics of the new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, C., and J. Manza. 2008. Why welfare states persist. The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2013. A broken public? Americans’ response to the great recession. American Sociological Review 78 (5): 727–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busemeyer, M.R., A. Goerres, and S. Weschle. 2009. Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing. The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (3): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebbinghaus, B. 2010. Unions and employers. In The Oxford handbook of the welfare state, ed. F.G. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, and C. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———., ed. 2011. Varieties of pension governance. The privatization of pensions in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ebbinghaus, B., and J. Neugschwender. 2011. The public-private pension mix and old age income inequality. In Varieties of pension governance. the privatization of pensions in Europe, ed. B. Ebbinghaus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edlund, J. 1999. Trust in government and welfare regimes. Attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway. European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 341–370.Google Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez, J.J., and A.M. Jaime-Castillo. 2013. Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms. European Sociological Review 29 (4): 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gelissen, J. 2001. Old-age pensions. Individual or collective responsibility? An investigation of public opinion across European welfare states. European Societies 3 (4): 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Häusermann, S. 2010. The politics of welfare state reform in continental Europe. Modernization in hard times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinrichs, K., and M. Jessoula. 2012. Labour market flexibility and pension reforms. Flexible today, secure tomorrow? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iversen, T., and D. Soskice. 2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–893.Google Scholar
  19. Jæger, M.M. 2006. Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution. The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review 22 (2): 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen, C. 2012. Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: Understanding cross-programme differences. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, C., and E. Naumann. 2016. Increasing pressures and support for public healthcare in Europe. Health Policy 120 (6): 698–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitschelt, H., and P. Rehm. 2006. New social risk and political preferences. In The politics of post-industrial welfare states. Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks, ed. K. Armingeon and G. Bonoli. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Korpi, W. 1983. The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Larsen, C.A. 2008. The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lepsius, M.R. 1990. Soziale Ungleichheit und Klassenstrukturen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Ideen, Interessen und Institutionen, ed. R.M. Lepsius. Opladen: Campus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linos, K., and M. West. 2003. Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution. Re-addressing the issue of cross-national variation. European Sociological Review 19 (4): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch, J., and M. Myrskylä. 2009. Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in European democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1068–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mau, S. 2004. Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange. Current Sociology 52 (1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meltzer, A.H., and S.F. Richard. 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myles, J., and P. Pierson. 2001. The comparative political economy of pension reform. In The new politics of the welfare state, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Naumann, E., M. Hess, and L. Steinkopf. 2015. Die Alterung der Gesellschaft und der Generationenkonflikt in Europa/Aging Societies and Intergenerational Conflict in Europe. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44 (6): 426–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oesch, D. 2006. Redrawing the class map. Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  34. Oesch, D., and J.R. Menes. 2011. Upgrading or polarization? Occupational change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990–2008. Socio-Economic Review 9 (3): 503–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierson, P. 2001a. Investigating the welfare state at century’s end (Introduction). In The new politics of the welfare state, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———., ed. 2001b. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Roller, E. 1995. The welfare state. The equality dimension. In The scope of government, ed. O. Borre and E. Scarbrough. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rueda, D. 2005. Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies. The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sainsbury, D. 1996. Gender, equality and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwander, H., and S. Häusermann. 2013. Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Svallfors, S. 1997. Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution. A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker, A. 1999. Political participation and representation of older people in Europe. In The politics of old age in Europe, ed. A. Walker and G. Naegele. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Weaver, R.K. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Policy and InterventionUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations