Abstract
Public opinion is considered a major obstacle to changing the status quo of welfare state policies. Yet some far-reaching reforms and gradual changes of European welfare states prompt the reverse question: Have increased reform pressures and restructuring efforts led to changes in individual attitudes? This chapter investigates individual attitudes towards public provision of healthcare in 14 European countries between 1996 and 2002. It shows a strong and stable support for a public provision of healthcare. Testing core assumptions of the new politics theory and power resources theory, the chapter also looks at conflict lines within society. Observing stability, not change, the study does not find evidence that the relevance of old cleavages is in decline. Both old and new cleavages shape individual attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In the countries I examined, the total expenditure on healthcare was on average 8.6% of the total GDP in 2001.
- 2.
For example, social class has definitely been a self-interest variable, as people in the same social and economic situation were assumed to share the same interests. But over time, class has possibly developed a formative character as well, socialising its members to hold class-specific values, even if these attitudes might no longer be in the individual interest. See Albrekt Larsen’s (2008) model in which he explains the formation of individual attitudes delineating self-interest, values, and class.
- 3.
A pareto optimum is defined as a situation where at least one member of the group/society is benefitting from a reform and no one is worse off. It is claimed that there will always be a majority who are in favour of this reform.
- 4.
Although acknowledging that more age categories might better represent different stages in the life course, I decided to use this very rough categorisation in order to keep results and models as simple and parsimonious as possible. The results did not significantly change if four or five age groups were used.
- 5.
The differences between countries but also the differences over time are not the result of a changing composition of the interviewed respondents within each country (e.g. due to population ageing) since the inclusion of individual level covariates into the multilevel model controls for such compositional effects.
- 6.
The results are presented in Table 10.2 in the Appendix.
- 7.
When more than two groups are distinguished for one category, the net difference was calculated for the two subgroups which held the most opposed attitudes.
References
Arts, W., and J. Gelissen. 2001. Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles. Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica 44 (4): 283–299.
Baslevent, C., and H. Kirmanoglu. 2011. Discerning self-interested behaviour in attitudes towards welfare state responsibilities across Europe. International Journal of Social Welfare 20 (4): 344–352.
Béland, D. 2010. Reconsidering policy feedback. How policies affect politics. Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399710377444.
Bertakis, K.D., R. Azari, L.J. Helms, E.J. Callahan, and J.A. Robbins. 2000. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. Journal of Family Practice 49 (2): 147.
Blekesaune, M., and J. Quadagno. 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–427.
Brooks, C., P. Nieuwbeerta, and J. Manza. 2006. Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective. Evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research 35 (1): 88–128.
Burstein, P. 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy. A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 29–40.
Busemeyer, M.R., A. Goerres, and S. Weschle. 2009. Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing. The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (3): 195–212.
Castles, F.G. 2009. What welfare states do. A disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of social Policy 38 (1): 45–62.
Clark, T., and S.M. Lipset. 2001. The breakdown of class politics: A debate on post-industrial stratification. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Deegan-Krause, K. 2006. New dimensions of political cleavage. In Oxford handbook of political science, ed. R. Dalton and H.-D. Klingenmann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edlund, J. 1999. Trust in government and welfare regimes. Attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway. European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 341–370.
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Evans, G. 1999. The end of class politics? Class voting in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, R., and M. Moran. 2000. Reforming health care in Europe. West European Politics 23 (2): 35–58.
Gardner, D.G., L.L. Cummings, R.B. Dunham, and J.L. Pierce. 1998. Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales. An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58 (6): 898–915.
Gelissen, J. 2000. Popular support for institutionalised solidarity. A comparison between European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare 9 (4): 285–300.
———. 2002. Worlds of welfare, worlds of consent? Public opinion on the welfare state. Leiden: Brill.
Gevers, J., J. Gelissen, W. Arts, and R. Muffels. 2000. Public health care in the balance. Exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare 9 (4): 301–321.
Hacker, J.S. 2004. Review article. Dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform. British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 693–724.
Häusermann, S. 2010. The politics of welfare state reform in continental Europe. Modernization in hard times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hox, J. 2010. Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
Inglehart, R. 1977. The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jæger, M.M. 2006. Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution. The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review 22 (2): 157–170.
Jakobsen, T.G. 2010. Public versus private. The conditional effect of state policy and institutional trust on mass opinion. European Sociological Review 26 (3): 307–318.
Jensen, C. 2007. Fixed or variable needs? Public support and welfare state reform. Government and Opposition 42 (2): 139–157.
———. 2008. Worlds of welfare services and transfers. Journal of European Social Policy 18 (2): 151–162.
Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler. 1991. Anomalies. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.
Kikuzawa, S., S. Olafsdottir, and B.A. Pescosolido. 2008. Similar pressures, different contexts. Public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations∗. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 49 (4): 385–399.
Korpi, W. 1983. The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge.
Korpi, W., and J. Palme. 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization. Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 97 (3): 425–446.
Larsen, C.A. 2008. The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–168.
Lipset, S.M., and S. Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments. An introduction. In Party systems and voter alignments. Cross-national perspectives, ed. S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan. New York: Free Press.
Lynch, J., and M. Myrskylä. 2009. Always the third rail? Pension income and policy preferences in European democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1068–1097.
McKeen, N.A., J.G. Chipperfield, and D.W. Campbell. 2004. A longitudinal analysis of discrete negative emotions and health-services use in elderly individuals. Journal of Aging and Health 16 (2): 204–227.
Page, B.I., and R.Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public. Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (02): 251–267.
Pierson, P. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quadagno, J., and J. Pederson. 2012. Has support for social security declined? Attitudes toward the public pension scheme in the USA, 2000 and 2010. International Journal of Social Welfare 21: 88–100.
Reynolds, J.R., and C.E. Ross. 1998. Social stratification and health. Education’s benefit beyond economic status and social origins. Social Problems 45 (2): 221–247.
Roller, E. 2002. Ende des sozialstaatlichen Konsenses? Zum Aufbrechen traditioneller und zur Entstehung neuer Konfliktstrukturen in Deutschland. In Demokratie und Partizipation, ed. O. Niedermayer and B. Westle. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Rose, D., and E. Harrison. 2007. The European socio-economic classification. A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies 9 (3): 459–490.
Ross, C.E., and J. Mirowsky. 1995. Does employment affect health? Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36: 230–243.
Ross, C.E., and C.-I. Wu. 1995. The links between education and health. American Sociological Review 60 (5): 719–745.
Rothgang, H., M. Cacace, L. Frisina, S. Grimmeisen, A. Schmid, and C. Wendt, eds. 2010. The state and healthcare. Comparing OECD countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sainsbury, D. 1996. Gender, equality and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmid, A., M. Cacace, and H. Rothgang. 2010. The changing role of the state in healthcare financing. In The state and healthcare. Comparing OECD countries, ed. H. Rothgang, M. Cacace, L. Frisina, S. Grimmeisen, A. Schmid, and C. Wendt. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmid, A., and C. Wendt. 2010. The changing role of the state in healthcare service provision. In The state and healthcare. Comparing OECD countries, ed. H. Rothgang, M. Cacace, L. Frisina, S. Grimmeisen, A. Schmid, and C. Wendt. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sihvo, T., and H. Uusitalo. 1995. Economic crises and support for the welfare state in Finland 1975–1993. Acta Sociologica 38 (3): 251–262.
Soroka, S.N., and C. Wlezien. 2009. Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svallfors, S. 1997. Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution. A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.
———. 2004. Class, attitudes and the welfare state. Sweden in comparative perspective. Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 119–138.
———. 2008. The generational contract in Sweden. Age-specific attitudes to age-related policies. Policy & Politics 36 (3): 381–396.
———. 2012. Public attitudes. In The Oxford handbook of the welfare state, ed. F.G. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, and C. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor-Gooby, P. 2011. Does risk society erode welfare state solidarity? Policy & Politics 39 (2): 147–161.
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
van Oorschot, W. 2006. Making the difference in social Europe. Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 23–42.
van Oorschot, W., T. Reeskens, and B. Meuleman. 2012. Popular perceptions of welfare state consequences. A multilevel, cross-national analysis of 25 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy 22 (2): 181–197.
Wendt, C., and J. Kohl. 2010. Translating monetary inputs into health care provision. A comparative analysis of the impact of different modes of public policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 12 (1–2): 11–31.
Wendt, C., J. Kohl, M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2010. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 177–192.
Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naumann, E. (2018). Increasing Conflict in Times of Retrenchment? Attitudes Towards Healthcare Provision in Europe Between 1996 and 2002. In: Ebbinghaus, B., Naumann, E. (eds) Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63651-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63652-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)