Skip to main content

Techno-Economic Viability of Husk Powered Systems for Rural Electrification in Uganda: Part I: Sustainability and Power Potential Aspects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nexus: Energy, Environment and Climate Change

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 907 Accesses

Abstract

Rural electrification by biomass gasification is a fairly new technology in East Africa. A Husk Power System (HPS) is one of such technologies utilizing agricultural residues as feedstock for power generation. Since biomass is considered carbon neutral, replacement of fossil fuel-based electricity by HPS derived electricity is one way to mitigate climate change through greenhouse gas reduction. Uganda is one among the countries in Africa having limited modern energy services such as electricity, though endowed with abundant biomass resources. Limited technical capacity to efficiently utilize biomass resources has been one of the major constraints of modern energy accessibility. In the more advanced developing countries like India however, efficient and environment-friendly technologies, such as HPS, have been developed and disseminated. In this study, a pilot HPS was imported from India and installed in Tiribogo village, Muduma Sub-county, Mpigi district in 2012 to supply electricity to rural communities through an isolated grid. But before extending such modern energy service to other parts of the country, there was a need to assess its technical performance, power potential of the fuel source and its sustainability in the selected agricultural rural areas. Coffee husks and rice husks were considered as fuel sources of a 34 kWe HPS. The plant was operating for 6 h per day at a specific fuel consumption rate of 0.798 and 1.235 kg/kWh and overall conversion efficiency of 28.6 and 23.4% for coffee husks and rice husks, respectively. It was found that 36,355 tons of coffee husks and 12,591 tons of rice husks, equivalent to 21.1 and 4.6 MWe basing on HPS performance, were generated annually from coffee and rice processing villages; this could sustain a total of 615 and 136 HPSs, respectively. However, it was more difficult to operate and sustain HPSs in villages connected to grid electricity and villages generating less than 480 tons of rice husks per year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boukis, I., Vassilakos, N., Karellas, S., & Kakaras, E. (2009). Techno-economic analysis of the energy exploitation of biomass residues in Heraklion Prefecture—Crete. Renew Sustainable Energy Review, 13(2), 362–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater, A. V. (1995). The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. Fuel, 74(5), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater, A. V., Toft, A. J., & Brammer, J. G. (2002). A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion. Renew Sustainable Energy Review, 6(3), 181–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, T., & Da Silva, I. (2010). Potential of distributed wood-based biopower systems serving basic electricity needs in rural Uganda. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14(1), 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buragohain, B., Mahanta, P., & Moholkar, V. S. (2010). Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, A. C., Palumbo, M., Pelagagge, P. M., & Scacchia, F. (2005). Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: Effects of logistic variables. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, O. (2010). Evaluating thermochemical properties and optimising densification conditions of coffee husks under low pressure (M.Sc. dissertation, Makerere University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Energypedia. (2015). Uganda energy situation. https://energypedia.info/wiki/Uganda_Energy_Situation#Biomass.5B6.5D. Accessed February 17, 2015.

  • EU-AITF. (2014). Uganda rural electrification project-IG. http://www.eu-africa-infrastructure-tf.net/activities/grants/uganda-rural-electrification-project---ig.htm. Accessed February 17, 2015.

  • Farley, S. E., Hawkins, R., & Wagner, C. S. (2011). Science, technology, and innovation in Uganda: Recommendations for policy and action. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B., & Pigneri, A. (2011). Potential for electrification from biomass gasification in Vanuatu. Energy, 36(3), 1640–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fracaro, G., Souza, S., Medeiros, M., Formentini, D., & Marques, A. (2011). Economic feasibility of biomass gasification for small-scale electricity generation in Brazil. Paper presented at the Linköping. Sweden: WREC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, A., Zubizarreta, J., Rodrigues, M., Dopazo, C., & Fueyo, N. (2010). An estimation of the energy potential of agro-industrial residues in Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(11), 972–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOU. (2010). National development plan (2010/11–2014/15). Kampala: The Government of Uganda (GOU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasler, P. H., & Nussbaumer, T. (1999). Gas cleaning for IC engine applications from fixed bed biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 16(6), 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyuha, T. S., Sabiiti, E. N., & Hisal, E. (2005). Impact of rice production on food security and women in Uganda. Paper presented at the African crop Science Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEMD. (2007). The renewable energy policy for Uganda. Kampala: Government of Uganda (GOU).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEMD. (2012). Renewable energy investment guide. Kampala: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD).

    Google Scholar 

  • MFPED. (2014). Poverty status report 2014: Structural change and poverty reduction in Uganda. Kampala: GOU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okello, C., Pindozzi, S., Faugno, S., & Boccia, L. (2013). Development of bioenergy technologies in Uganda: A review of progress. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olupot, P. W., Candia, A., Menya, E., & Walozi, R. (2015). Characterization of rice husk varieties in Uganda for biofuels and their techno-economic feasibility in gasification. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 107, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahardjo, B. S. (2013). Influence air factor against operating parameters of biomass fluidized-bed gasifier. International Journal of Engineering Science, 4(2), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalia, G. L., Aiello, G., Micale, R., & Enea, M. (2012). Distribution of biomass and site location of combustion and gasification power plants in western Sicily. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(2), 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (2010). A comparative analysis of decentralised energy systems (DESI) power and husk power systems: small-scale biomass power generators in india rural market insight brief: empowering villages (p. 19). Taramani, Chennai: Institute for Financial Management & Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, A. K., Iyer, P., Kandpal, T. C., & Singh, K. K. (1998). Assessment of availability and costs of some agricultural residues used as feedstocks for biomass gasification and briquetting in India. Energy Conversion and Management, 39(15), 1611–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBOS. (2014). Statistical abstract. Kampala: The Republic of Uganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. Z., Huang, H. T., Zheng, S. P., Luo, Z. F., Yin, X. L., & Chen, Y. (2001). Techno economic evaluation of biomass gasification and power generation in China. Paper presented at the proceeding of third Asia Pacific conference on sustainable energy and environmental technologies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Renewable Energy Incubator of Makerere University and National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO), and Pamoja Cleantech in accessing the Husk Power System installation. Special thanks go to Dr. Musinguzi Wilson for the support and guidance. The authors also acknowledge the support from government and local communities from coffee and rice growing areas of Uganda, and the HPS Company in India for providing the necessary information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonah K. Turinayo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turinayo, Y.K., Okure, M.A.E. (2018). Techno-Economic Viability of Husk Powered Systems for Rural Electrification in Uganda: Part I: Sustainability and Power Potential Aspects. In: Leal Filho, W., Surroop, D. (eds) The Nexus: Energy, Environment and Climate Change. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63612-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63612-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63611-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63612-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics