An Application of Parallel Satisfiability Solving to the Verification of Complex Embedded Systems

  • Orlando Ferrante
  • Alberto Ferrari
  • Christos Sofronis
  • Leonardo Mangeruca
  • Luca Benvenuti
Chapter

Abstract

Model checking has reached a maturity level that allows its techniques to be applied to the verification of industrial systems. Several algorithms and methods have been proposed to increase its effectiveness to tackle models of increasing complexity. In this chapter we present an application of Parallel Satisfiability Solving to the verification of embedded control systems. The adopted toolchain is part of the Formal Specs Verifier framework for the formal verification of Simulink/Stateflow models. The experiments we performed show that the use of a parallel satisfiability solver allows for an average speedup of an order of magnitude or more on industrial strength models.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Miller, S., Anderson, E., Wagner, L., Whalen, M., Heimdahl, M.: Formal verification of flight critical software. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. (2005) 15–18Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Miller, S., Whalen, M., Cofer, D.: Software model checking takes off. Communications of the ACM 53(2) (2010) 58–64Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Giunchiglia, E., Giunchiglia, F., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Sebastiani, R., Tacchella, A.: Nusmv 2: An opensource tool for symbolic model checking. (2002) 359–364Google Scholar
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Ball, T., Levin, V., Rajamani, S.K.: A decade of software model checking with SLAM, Communications of the ACM, 54(7), pp 68–76, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ball, T., Cook, B., Levin, V., Rajamani, S.K.: SLAM and Static Driver Verifier: Technology transfer of formal methods inside Microsoft. pp 1–20, IFM, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Godefroid, P.: Compositional dynamic test generation (extended abstract), POPL 2007.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Burch, J.R., Clarke, E.M., Mc Millan, K.L., Dill, D.L., Hwang, L.J.: Symbolic model checking: 10ˆ20 states and beyond, LICS, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Zhu, Y.: Symbolic model checking without BDDs. Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (1999) 193–207Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Barrett, C., Sebastiani, R., Seshia, S., Tinelli, C.: Satisfiability modulo theories. Handbook of Satisfiability 4 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hamadi, Y., Sais, L.: ManySAT: a parallel SAT solver. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation (JSAT) (2009)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Ferrari, A., Mangeruca, L., Ferrante, O., Mignogna, A.: DesyreML: a SysML profile for heterogeneous embedded systems. In: Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS). (2012)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Mangeruca, L., Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A.: Formalization and completeness of evolving requirements using contracts. In: 8th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES). (2013)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Carloni, M., Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A., Massaroli, G., Orazzo, A., Petrone, I., Velardi, L.: Contract-based analysis for verification of communication-based train control (CBTC) system. In: SAFECOMP. (2014)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Carloni, M., Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A., Massaroli, G., Orazzo, A., Petrone, I., Velardi, L.: Contract modeling and verification with formal specs verifier toolsuite - application to Ansaldo STS rapid transit metro system use case. In: SAFECOMP. (2015)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Ferrante, O., Benvenuti, L., Mangeruca, L., Sofronis, C., Ferrari, A.: Parallel NuSMV: a NuSMV extension for the verification of complex embedded systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security 7613 (2012) 409–416Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Marazza, M., Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A.: Automatic generation of failure scenarios for sytems-on-chip. In: Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS). (2014)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A., Marazza, M.: An algorithm for the incremental generation of high coverage test suites. In: 19th IEEE European Test Symposium. (2014)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ferrante, O., Ferrari, A., Marazza, M.: Formal Specs Verifier ATG: a tool for model-based generation of high coverage test suites. In: ERTS. (2016)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Een, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT-solver [ver 1.2] (2003)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Herbstritt, M.: zChaff: Modifications and extensions. (2001)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Murray, R.M., et al.: Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  26. [26]

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orlando Ferrante
    • 1
  • Alberto Ferrari
    • 1
  • Christos Sofronis
    • 1
  • Leonardo Mangeruca
    • 1
  • Luca Benvenuti
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Laboratory on Embedded Systems - United Technologies Research CenterEast HartfordUSA
  2. 2.“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations