Skip to main content

Pedodiversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedometrics

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Pedodiversity deals with the analysis of the number and complexity of pre-classified soil entities and/or their properties in the landscape (Fridland 1974; Jacuchno 1976; Linkeš et al. 1983; Ibañez et al. 1987, 1995; McBratney 1992; McBratney and Minasny 2007; Ibáñez and Bockheim 2013). If we consider that soil directly and/or indirectly affects every single biotic structure, it is easy to see that the study of its distribution needs to be a priority when trying to preserve the biodiversity of our planet. Whereas the pedologist might regard pedodiversity a great boon, an agronomist might regard the exact same situation a nuisance.

Como la tierra

eres

necesaria.”

“As the earth

You are

necessary.”

Pablo Neruda

Oda a la Alegría

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrhenius O (1920) Öcologische studien in den Stockholmer Schären, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9(1):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop T, McBratney A, Whelan B (2001) Measuring the quality of digital soil maps using information criteria. Geoderma 103(1):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss CI, Fisher RA (1953) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9(2):176–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BE (1981) Soil classification for soil survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JB, Edmonds WJ (1984) The missing geographic dimension to soil taxonomy. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 74(1):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell N, Mulcahy M, Mcarthur W (1970) Numerical classification of soil profiles on the basis of field morphological properties. Soil Res 8(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceriani L, Verme P (2012) The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini. J Econ Inequal 10(3):421–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11(4):265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A (2005) Species estimation and applications. In: Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, 2nd edn, vol 12. Wiley, New York, pp 7907–7916

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Lee S-M (1992) Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J Am Stat Assoc 87(417):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Mark CKY (1993) Stopping rules and estimation for recapture debugging with unequal failure rates. Biometrika 80(1):193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen T-J (2004) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Lett 8(2):148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 345(1311):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries FT, Thébault E, Liiri M, Birkhofer K, Tsiafouli MA, Bjørnlund L, Bracht Jørgensen H, Brady MV, Christensen S, de Ruiter PC, d’Hertefeldt T, Frouz J, Hedlund K, Hemerik L, Hol WHG, Hotes S, Mortimer SR, Setälä H, Sgardelis SP, Uteseny K, van der Putten WH, Wolters V, Bardgett RD (2013) Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:14296–14301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo MP, McBratney AB, Minasny B (2017) Measuring functional pedodiversity using spectroscopic information. Catena 152:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feoli E, Ganis P, Ricotta C (2013) Measuring diversity on environmental systems. In: Ibáñez JJ, Bockheim JG (eds) Pedodiversity. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol 12(1):42–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridland V (1965) Make-up of the soil cover. Sov Soil Sci 4:343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridland VM (1974) Special issue soil science in the U.S.S.R structure of the soil mantle. Geoderma 12(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1922) On the relation between species and area. Ecology 3(2):158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiasu RC, Guiasu S (2012) The weighted Gini-Simpson index: revitalizing an old index of biodiversity. Int J Ecol 2012:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Gong P, Amundson R (2003) Pedodiversity in the United States of America. Geoderma 117(1–2):99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltshe JF, Forrester NE (1983) Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GB, Ribeiro E, Samuel-Rosa A, Kempen B, Leenaars JG, Walsh MG (2014) SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS One 9(8):e105992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren GG (1988) The point representation of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52(3):712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes PA, McBratney AB, Minasny B, Campbell S (2014) End members, end points and extragrades in numerical soil classification. Geoderma 226–227:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez JJ, Bockheim JG (2013) Pedodiversity. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ibàñez JJ, García-Alvarez A (2002) Diversidad: biodiversidad edáica y geodiversidad. Edafología 9(3):329–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez J, García A, Monturiol F, El Hombre, C.E.d.P (1987) Heterogeneidad edáfica inducida por el adehesamiento del bosque mediterráneo. MAB, Instituto Nacional de Edafología y Agrobiología “Jose María Albareda”

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez JJ, Jiménez Ballesta R, García Alvarez A (1990) Soil landscapes and drainage basins in Mediterranean mountain areas. Catena 17(6):573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez JJ, De-Albs S, Bermúdez FF, García-Álvarez A (1995) Pedodiversity: concepts and measures. Catena 24(3):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez JJ, De-Alba S, Lobo A, Zucarello V (1998) Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales (with discussion). Geoderma 83(3):171–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez J, García-Álvarez A, Saldaña A, Recatalá L (2003) Scientific rationality, quantitative criteria and practical implications in the design of soil reserves networks: their role in soil biodiversity and soil quality studies. Preserving soil quality and soil biodiversity—the role of surrogate indicators. IMIA-CSIC, Zaragoza, pp 191–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez JJ, Krasilnikov PV, Saldaña A (2012) REVIEW: archive and refugia of soil organisms: applying a pedodiversity framework for the conservation of biological and non-biological heritages. J Appl Ecol 49(6):1267–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell RF (2002) The Australian soil classification. In: Isbell RF (ed) Australian soil and land survey handbook, vol 4. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam K, McBratney A, Singh B (2005) Rapid estimation of soil variability from the convex hull biplot area of topsoil ultra-violet, visible and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Geoderma 128(3–4):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen NK (1984) Soil map of Denmark according to the FAO-UNESCO legend. Geogr Tidsskr Dan J Geogr 84(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacuchno V (1976) K voprosu opredelenia raznoobrazija struktury pocvennogo pokrova. Tezisy dokl. III. VSES Sov. Po structure pocv. Pokrova. Vaschnil, Moskvao

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn R, Blume HP, Asio VB, Spaargaren O, Schad P (2006) Guidelines for soil description, 4th edn. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WM (1963) The pedon and the polypedon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 27(2):212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasil’nikov PV (2009) A handbook of soil terminology, correlation and classification. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre LF (2012) Numerical ecology, vol 24. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinster T, Cobbold CA (2012) Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity. Ecology 93(3):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkeš V, Simonyová S, Tobrman D (1983) Zložitosť štruktúry pôdneho pokryvu hodnotena pomocou entropie. Ved. Pr. VU podozalec. Vysivy rastl. Bratislave, pp 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowitz GE (1984) Mapping the local information content of a spatial image. Pattern Recogn 17(5):545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1957) On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 43(3):293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Why diversity? Ecological diversity and its measurement. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2013) Measuring biological diversity. Wiley, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney A (1992) On variation, uncertainty and informatics in environmental soil management. Soil Res 30(6):913–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney A, Minasny B (2007) On measuring pedodiversity. Geoderma 141(1–2):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendicino G, Sole A (1997) The information content theory for the estimation of the topographic index distribution used in TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 11:1099–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis L, Menten ML (1913) Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochemist 49(333–369):352

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, McBratney AB, Hartemink AE (2010) Global pedodiversity, taxonomic distance, and the world reference base. Geoderma 155(3):132–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motomura I (1932) On the statistical treatment of communities. Zool Mag 44:379–383

    Google Scholar 

  • NRCS, U (1993). Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil conservation service. US Department of Agriculture Handbook 18:315

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil G, Taillie C (1976) Ecological diversity: concepts, indices and applications. Proceedings of the international biometric conference. Biometric Soc, vol 20. pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet RK (1974) The measurement of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen A, Gröngröft A, Miehlich G (2010) Methods to quantify the pedodiversity of 1 km2 areas – results from southern African drylands. Geoderma 155(3–4):140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD, Marion DA (2005) Biomechanical effects, lithological variations, and local pedodiversity in some forest soils of Arkansas. Geoderma 124(1–2):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado P, Dantas-Miranda M, Chalom A (2016) R-package sads: maximum likelihood models for species abundance distributions

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston FW (1948) The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29(3):254–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor Popul Biol 21(1):24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (2010) Quadratic entropy and analysis of diversity. Sankhya A 72(1):70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rényi A (1961) On measures of entropy and information. Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, pp 547–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Szeidl L (2006) Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao’s quadratic index. Theor Popul Biol 70(3):237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña A (2013) Pedodiversity and landscape ecology, pedodiversity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 105–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña A, Ibáñez JJ (2004) Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain). Geomorphology 62(1–2):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña A, Ibáñez JJ (2007) Pedodiversity, connectance and spatial variability of soil properties, what is the relationship? Ecol Model 208(2–4):342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña A, Stein A, Zinck JA (1998) Spatial variability of soil properties at different scales within three terraces of the Henares River (Spain). Catena 33(3–4):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EP, van Belle G (1984) Nonparametric estimation of species richness. Biometrics 40(1): 119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamames J, Abellán JJ, Pignatelli M, Camacho A, Moya A (2010) Environmental distribution of prokaryotic taxa. BMC Microbiol 10(1):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. Encycl Biodivers 3(1):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1990) Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited. J Anim Ecol 59(3):1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomanian N, Esfandiarpoor I (2010) Challenges of pedodiversity in soil science. Eurasian Soil Sci 43(13):1486–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomanian N, Jalalian A, Khademi H, Eghbal MK, Papritz A (2006) Pedodiversity and pedogenesis in Zayandeh-rud Valley, Central Iran. Geomorphology 81(3–4):376–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toti DS, Coyle FA, Miller JA (2000) A structured inventory of Appalachian grass bald and heath bald spider assemblages and a test of species richness estimator performance. J Arachnol 28(3):329–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis J, Ward WT, Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2001) Creation and interpolation of continuous soil layer classes in the lower Namoi valley. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(2):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20(1):171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture Soil, Conservation Service (1975) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. US Government Printing Office

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Soil, Conservation Service (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd Edition. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21(2/3):213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort; an introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Fajardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fajardo, M., McBratney, A.B. (2018). Pedodiversity. In: McBratney, A., Minasny, B., Stockmann, U. (eds) Pedometrics. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63439-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics