Abstract
Cervical cancers represent 3.5% of all gynaecological malignancies with a 55% overall 5-year survival. In the United Kingdom, around 3500 cases are diagnosed every year (~9.5–10.5/100,000). This disease results in 1000 deaths annually. The incidence and mortality dropped dramatically in the 1990s due to the impact of the introduction of cervical screening programme. Radical hysterectomy remained the preferred method of treatment for patients with early-stage disease. The operation compromises two components: central resection of the cervix and its surroundings as well as complete removal of the draining regional lymph nodes. In 2006, Sert and Abeler described the first reported robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (Piver Type III) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for Stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. The operation lasted 7 h and 20 min with an estimated blood loss of 200 mL [1]. The patient was discharged home 4 days later without major complications. Several reports/statements were published in literature supporting the robotic technique and demonstrating its oncological safety [2]. The surgical technique of the robotic radical hysterectomy described in this chapter follows the principles of those originally reported by Okabayashi in 1921 [3], which were designed to minimise the transection of the pelvic autonomic nerves.
References
Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27:531–3.
Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:86–91.
Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri, modification of the Takayama operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;33:335–41.
Symmonds RE. Some surgical aspects of gynecologic cancer. Cancer. 1975;36(2):649–60.
Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303.
Magrina JF, Long JB, Kho RM, Giles DL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy: technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(1):184–7.
Leblanc E, Narducci F, Frumovitz M, Lesoin A, Castelain B, Baranzelli MC, Taieb S, Fournier C, Querleu D. Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:304–11.
Gold MA, Tian C, Whitney CW, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2008;112:1954–63.
Klauschie J, Wechter ME, Jacob K, Zanagnolo V, Montero R, Magrina J, Kho R. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(4):504–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
(WMV 140902 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
El-Ghobashy, A., Soo Hoo, S., Magrina, J. (2018). Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. In: El-Ghobashy, A., Ind, T., Persson, J., Magrina, J. (eds) Textbook of Gynecologic Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63429-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63429-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63428-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63429-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)