Advertisement

Dialectical Logic

  • Ermanno Bencivenga
Chapter
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 4)

Abstract

In Hegel’s dialectical logic, arguments never come to an end, and continuing them often results in proving consequences contrary to what was proved before: by continuing an argument that proves the mortality of Socrates, we may end up proving his immortality. Since not even contrariety can determine radical differences, those who reason according to this logic (like Hegel himself) have a tendency to deny such differences, and to think of world history as a single connected narrative—they have a tendency to monism. But note that, insofar as the word “narrative” is suggestive of a temporal development, this suggestion must be resisted: that one thing follows another in time must still be explained logically; history itself must turn from chronicle to demonstration. Time presents us with the immediacy of dialectical development; but this immediacy must be redeemed by being mediated conceptually; time parameters are promissory notes to be paid off by providing an account of why certain things did not just follow but had to follow certain other things—at which point the time parameters can be dispensed with.

Optimism is also naturally forthcoming in this framework, not so much because a point of view is available which is external to the narrative and argues for a positive resolution of it as rather because each phase of the narrative can only be spelling out its own (internal) values and seeing them reflected in the ways in which that phase is in fact turning out. On the other hand, dialectical logic cannot be formalized, because the whole context in which an argument is phrased (which, tendentially, is really the whole context) must always remain available for the next steps of the argument to be made. No abstraction from content is ever going to be legitimate.

Bibliography

  1. Aristotle, The Complete Works, in two volumes, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984b.Google Scholar
  2. Bencivenga, Ermanno. Kant’s Copernican Revolution. New York, Oxford University Press, 1987a.Google Scholar
  3. Bencivenga, Ermanno. Hegel’s Dialectical Logic. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000a.Google Scholar
  4. Bencivenga, Ermanno. “On the Very Possibility of a Formal Logic and Why Dialectical Logic Cannot be One.” The Philosophical Forum 46 (2015), pp. 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part I of the Encyclopaia of Philosophical Sciences, translated by Théodore F. Geraets, Wallis Arthur Suchting, and Henry Silton Harris. Indianapolis (IN): Hackett Publishing Company, 1991c (1991a).Google Scholar
  7. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, translated by Hugh Barr Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991a. (1991b).Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Philosophy of History, translated by John Sibree. Buffalo (NY): Prometheus Books, 1991b. (1991c).Google Scholar
  9. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by Arnold Vincent Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977a. (1977b).Google Scholar
  10. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, translated by Arnold Vincent Miller. Atlantic Highlands (NJ): Humanities Press, 1990a.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Letters, translated by Clark Butler and Christiane Seiler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984a.Google Scholar
  12. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen William Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Die philosophischen Schriften, vol. 4, edited by Karl Immanuel Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1880.Google Scholar
  14. Russell, Bertrand. Our Knowledge of the External World. London: Allen & Unwin, 1914.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ermanno Bencivenga
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations