Ventral abdominal hernias remain a challenge for the general surgeon. Optimal management is still being sought; however, several advantages have developed in recent years that allow for low recurrence rates, decreased surgical site infections, and decreased length of inpatient stay. Although there exists little data supporting the robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair, the benefit appears to be its ability to replicate an open operation, in a minimally invasive fashion. This chapter will provide details on preoperative care, operative steps, postoperative care, and some common tips and pitfalls that occur with robotic ventral hernia repair for both single-dock Rives-Stoppa and double-dock bilateral transversus abdominis muscle release hernia repair techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Rives J, et al. Treatment of large eventrations (apropos of 133 cases). Minerva Chir. 1977;32(11):749–56.Google Scholar
Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(3):519–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novitsky YW, et al. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdalla RZ, et al. Modified robot assisted Rives/Stoppa videosurgery for midline ventral hernia repair. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2012;25(2):129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren JA, Cobb W, Ewing J, Carbonell AM. Prospective observational cohort study of robotic vs open Rives-Stoppa retrorectus incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19:S177–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Warren JA, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;31(1):1–9.Google Scholar