Transforming Assessment Research: Recommendations for Future Research

Chapter
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter will identify and outline current gaps in research into assessment practice and tie the results of the ASSIST-ME project onto this outline. In this way, the chapter will present concrete research vistas that are still needed in international assessment research. The chapter concludes with a key theme that appears across many of the chapters in this volume, namely, issues concerning the operationalisation of complex learning goals into teaching and assessment activities.

References

  1. Andrade, H. L. (2012). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17–34). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Belova, N., Dittmar, J., Hansson, L., Hofstein, A., Nielsen, J. A., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (in press). Cross-curricular goals and raising the relevance of science education. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, J. Lavonen, & A. Uitto (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2015 conference. Rotterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM-Part 1. ASSIST-ME Report Series, 1.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (2014). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy, Structure of the observed learning outcome. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Grading. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 257–272). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bungum, B. (2006). Transferring and transforming technology education: A study of Norwegian teachers’ perceptions of ideas from design & technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, C. (2012). Research on teacher competency in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 71–84). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique – du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.Google Scholar
  9. Cowie, B. (2012). Assessment in the science classroom: Priorities, practices. And prospects. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 473–488). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Danish Ministry of Education. (2013). Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til studentereksamen. Nr 776 af 26/06/2013 (Executive Order nr. 776 of 26/06/2013). Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Desurmont, A., Forsthuber, B., & Oberheidt, S. (2008). Levels of autonomy and responsibilities of teachers in Europe. Eurydice. Available from: EU Bookshop.Google Scholar
  12. Dolin, J. (2012). ASSIST-ME project proposal. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  13. Dolin, J. (2016). Idealer og realiteter i målorienteret undervisning. [Ideals and realities in goal-oriented teaching]. Cursiv, 19(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
  14. Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105.Google Scholar
  15. Dysthe, O., Engelsen, K. S., Madsen, T., & Wittek, L. (2008). A theory-based discussion of assessment criteria – The balance between explicitness and negotiation. In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 121–131). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., & Komorek, M. (1996). Educational reconstruction – Bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students' conceptions. NARST, 1996, 22.Google Scholar
  17. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McMillan, J. H. (2012). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 3–16). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Moss, P. A. (2008). Sociocultural implications for assessment I: Classroom assessment. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 222–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen, J. A. (2015). Assessment of innovation competency: A thematic analysis of upper secondary school teachers’ talk. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 318–330. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.886178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nielsen, J. A., & Dolin, J. (2016). Evaluering mellem mestring og præstation. [Assessment between mastery and performance]. MONA, 2016(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  23. Randel, B., & Clark, T. (2012). Measuring classroom assessment practices. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 145–164). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground –A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruiz-Primo, M., & Li, M. (2012). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 215–232). Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.Google Scholar
  26. Schneider, M. C., & Andrade, H. (2013). Teachers’ and administrators’ use of evidence of student learning to take action: Conclusions drawn from a special issue on formative assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 159–162. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2013.793189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Bake (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. doi: 10.1080/09695940701591867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiek, A., Bernstein, M., Foley, R., Cohen, M., Forrest, N., Kuzdas, C., … Keeler, L. (2015). Operationalising competencies in higher education for sustainable development. In M. Barth, G. Michelsen, M. Rieckmann, & I. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of higher education for sustainable development. Routledge (pp. 241–260). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Winsløw, C. (2011). Anthropological theory of didactic phenomena: Some examples and principles of its use in the study of mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Un panorama de la TAD. An overview of ATD, CRM documents (Vol. 10, pp. 117–138). Barcelona: Centre de Recerca Matemàtica.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Alexis Nielsen
    • 1
  • Jens Dolin
    • 1
  • Sofie Tidemand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science EducationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations