Skip to main content

Young People as Victims of Crime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

Abstract

Chapter 4 shifts the focus from young people’s offending to their experience as victims of crime. This chapter presents initial ISRD3 findings on victimization from 27 countries. The chapter presents data for (1) victimization in the previous year and (2) whether the police were notified of this victimization. Patterns of victimization are presented under four headings: “Core crimes” (robbery, theft, and assault; cyberbullying; hate crime; and parental use of physical force). The chapter also shows (incidence-based) rates of police notification of victimization, as well as the reporting frequency per 100 incidents. One of the main findings emerging from the analyses is that police reporting rates do not seem to link primarily to distrust in the police. Chapter 4 also includes some important and novel findings on domestic violence against children, as well as on hate crime victimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We need to reiterate here that the data for the USA are still incomplete and preliminary and likely will be adjusted later.

  2. 2.

    Based on the online follow-ups, the Finnish “excess” cases were concentrated to shopping mall incidents.

  3. 3.

    However, note that both India and Cape Verde have a relatively high level of missing data (11% and 12%, respectively)

  4. 4.

    However, the assumption that police will record all crimes that are reported is clearly untenable, as many national crime surveys indicate. It is highly likely that police recording practice will differ across countries (see Luneev 1997; Enzmann 2015; Lysova and Shchitov 2015).

  5. 5.

    Croatia is an exception to this pattern.

  6. 6.

    Note that this figure is based on a small sample of cases.

  7. 7.

    The values of HDI are centered at the total mean and standardized by two standard deviations in order to make the size of the odds ratios compatible to effects of the dichotomous dummy variables of migration status (see Gelman 2008).

  8. 8.

    The US questionnaire asked about racial and ethnic identification as follows: “Do you think of yourself as (1) White (not Spanish/Hispanic/Latino), (2) Black or African American, (3) American Indian or Alaska Native, (4) Asian, (5) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, (6) White Spanish/Hispanic/Latino, (7) Non-White Spanish/Hispanic/Latino or (8) Other?” This is consistent with common use by the US census. Note that in the current analysis, white Spanish students are treated as distinct from those students who identified themselves as simply “white.”

  9. 9.

    Elliott and Urquiza (2006) have made a strong argument that the issue of the role of ethnicity, race, and culture in child maltreatment in the USA is complex and in need of additional exploration. This is also true for other national contexts.

  10. 10.

    Hate crime is not, of course, a new form of victimization, but its classification within criminal statistics and criminological research is recent.

References

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosick, S. J., Rennison, C. M., Gover, R., & Dodge, M. (2012). Reporting violence to the police: Predictors through the life course. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissioner for Human Rights. (2008). Children and corporal punishment: “The right not to be hit, also a children’s right” (Issue Paper 2008). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806da87b.

  • Council of Europe. (2015). Progress towards prohibiting all corporal punishment in Council of Europe Member States. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/children/CoE_progress_table_prohibiting_cp_March2015.pdf

  • Dakil, S. R., Cox, M., Lin, H., & Flores, G. (2011). Racial and ethnic disparities in physical abuse reporting and child protective services interventions in the United States. Journal of the National Medical Association, 103, 926–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castelbajac, M. (2013). The difficulties of invention: On the multiple invention of crime victim surveys in Scandinavia and the US in the post-war era. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 14, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K., & Urquiza, A. (2006). Ethnicity, culture, and child maltreatment. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 787–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann, D. (2012). Social responses to offending. In J. Junger-Tas, H. I. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime. contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 143–182). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann, D. (2015). Anzeigeverhalten und Registrierungspraxis. In N. Guzy, C. Birkel, & R. Mischkowitz (Eds.), Viktimisierungsbefragungen in Deutschland. Band 1: Ziele, Nutzen und Forschungsstand (pp. 511–541). Wiesbaden, Germany: Bundeskriminalamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, L. A. (2002). Child discipline and physical abuse in immigrant Latino families: Reducing violence and misunderstandings. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, J., & Chakraborti, N. (2012). Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union. European Journal of Criminology, 9, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865–2873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, E. T., & Bitensky, S. H. (2007). The case against corporal punishment of children: Converging evidence from social science research and international human rights law and implications for U.S. public policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 231–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children (2009). Prohibiting corporal punishment of children: A guide to legal reform and other measures. London, UK: Association for the Protection of All Children. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from http://endcorporalpunishment.org/assets/pdfs/reports-technical/Legal-reform-handbook-2009-EN.pdf

  • Goudriaan, H., Lynch, J. P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2004). Reporting to the police in western nations: A theoretical analysis of the effects of social context. Justice Quarterly, 21, 933–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. C. & Rennison, C. (2003) Reporting crime to the police, 1992-2000 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. March 2003, NCJ 195710). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rcp00.pdf

  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013). Trust in justice and the legitimacy of legal authorities: Topline findings from a European comparative study. In S. Body-Gendrot, M. Hough, R. Levy, K. Kerezsi, & S. Snacken (Eds.), European Handbook of Criminology (pp. 243–265). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRD3 Working Group. (2013). Questionnaire ISRD3: Standard student questionnaire (ISRD3 Technical Report Series #2). Retrieved April 5, 2017, from http://www.northeastern.edu/isrd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ISRD3_TechRep_2.pdf

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S. R., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M., & Galev, T. (2011). Developing european indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, C. (2002). The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 432–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivivuori, J. (2014). Understanding trends in personal violence: Does cultural sensitivity matter? Crime and Justice, 43, 289–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivivuori, J. (2015). Hate crime in Europe and beyond: Moving towards ISRD3 based comparative analysis (Paper presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the of the American Society of Criminology, November 18–21, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Luneev, V. V. (1997). Crime in the XXth century: Global, regional and Russian trends [Russian]. Moscow: NORMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysova, A., & Shchitov, N. (2015). What is Russia’s real homicide rate? Statistical reconstruction and the ‘decivilizing process’. Theoretical Criminology, 19, 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., Keipi, T., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Cybercrime victimization among young people: A multi-nation study. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 16, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1990). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx.

  • Van Kesteren, J. (2016). Assessing the risk and prevalence of hate crime victimization in Western Europe. International Review of Victimology, 22, 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yar, M. (2005). The novelty of ‘cybercrime’: An assessment in light of routine activity theory. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enzmann, D., Kivivuori, J., Haen Marshall, I., Steketee, M., Hough, M., Killias, M. (2018). Young People as Victims of Crime. In: A Global Perspective on Young People as Offenders and Victims. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63233-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63233-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63232-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63233-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics