Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement pp 99–130Cite as

Genomic Selection for Small Grain Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter we present an overview of genomic selection (GS) research in the small grain cereals and interpret some of the results across studies where there is a growing body of information. We also provide the reader with approaches to implementation of GS in applied breeding programs and how various scenarios affect gain from selection and cost relative to conventional breeding. Training population optimization is discussed as well as the factors that affect prediction accuracy. We conclude with comments on future research directions required to improve the efficiency of GS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Abbreviations

BB:

BayesB

BRR:

Bayesian ridge regression

CIMMYT:

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

DArT:

Diversity Array Technology

DHs:

Doubled haploids

DON:

Deoxynivalenol

ECs:

Environmental covariates

FHB:

Fusarium head blight

GBS:

Genotyping by sequencing

GEBV:

Genomic estimated breeding value

GS:

Genomic selection

GxE:

Genotype-by-environment interaction

h 2 :

Heritability

HTP:

High-throughput phenotyping

LD:

Linkage disequilibrium

MAS:

Marker-assisted selection

MEs:

Mega-environments

MET:

Multi-environment trials

MxE:

Marker-by-environment interaction

PS:

Phenotypic selection

QTL:

Quantitative trait loci, RR-BLUP, ridge-regression best linear unbiased prediction

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

TPE:

Target population of environments

References

  • Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Heun JT, Thorp KR, Carmo-Silva AE, French AN et al (2014) Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. Funct Plant Biol 41(1):68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araus JL, Cairns JE (2014) Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci 19(1):52–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arruda MP, Brown PJ, Lipka AE, Krill AM, Thurber C, Kolb FL (2015) Genomic selection for predicting fusarium head blight resistance in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 8(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asoro FG, Newell MA, Beavis WD, Scott MP, Jannink J-L (2011) Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in elite North American oats. Plant Genome J 4(2):132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asoro FG, Newell MA, Beavis WD, Scott MP, Tinker NA, Jannink JL (2013) Genomic, marker-assisted, and pedigree-BLUP selection methods for β-glucan concentration in elite oat. Crop Sci 53(5):1894–1906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battenfield SD, Guzmán C, Gaynor RC, Singh RP, Peña RJ, Dreisigacker S et al (2016) Genomic selection for processing and end-use quality traits in the CIMMYT spring bread wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 9(2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (2009) Genomewide selection for rapid introgression of exotic germplasm in maize. Crop Sci 49(2):419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (2016) Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theor. Appl. Genet. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. 129(12):2323–2332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R, Yu J (2007) Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci 47(3):1082–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgueño J, Crossa J, Cotes JM, Vicente FS, Das B (2011) Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multienvironment trials. Crop Sci 51(3):944–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgueño J, de los Campos G, Weigel K, Crossa J (2012) Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype x environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci 52(2):707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer L, Ruckelshausen A, Möller K, Melchinger AE, Alheit KV, Maurer HP et al (2013) Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation. Sci Rep 3:2442

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chun H, Keleş S (2010) Sparse partial least squares regression for simultaneous dimension reduction and variable selection. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 72(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb JN, DeClerck G, Greenberg A, Clark R, McCouch S (2013) Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 867–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Technow F, Messina C, Gho C, Totir LR (2016) Use of crop growth models with whole-genome prediction: application to a maize multienvironment trial. Crop Sci 56:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain JL, Reynolds MP, Poland JA (2016) Utilizing high-throughput phenotypic data for improved phenotypic selection of stress adaptive traits in wheat. Crop Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J (2012) From genotype x environment interaction to gene x environment interaction. Curr Genomics 13(3):225–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, Jarquín D, Franco J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Burgueño J, Saint-Pierre C et al (2016a) Genomic prediction of gene bank wheat landraces. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 6(7):1819–1834

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, de los Campos G, Maccaferri M, Tuberosa R, Burgueño J, Pérez-Rodríguez P (2016b) Extending the marker X environment interaction model for genomic-enabled prediction and genome-wide association analysis in durum wheat. Crop Sci 56(5):2193–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, De Los CG, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL et al (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186(2):713–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas J, Crossa J, Montesinos-Lopez O, Burgueno J, Perez-Rodriguez P, de los Campos G (2017) Bayesian genomic prediction with genotype × environment interaction kernel models. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 7(1):41–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas J, Crossa J, Soberanis V, Pérez-Elizalde S, Pérez-Rodríguez P, de los Campos G et al (2016) Genomic prediction of genotype x environment interaction kernel regression models. Plant Genome 9(3):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daetwyler HD, Bansal UK, Bariana HS, Hayden MJ, Hayes BJ (2014) Genomic prediction for rust resistance in diverse wheat landraces. Theor Appl Genet 127(8):1795–1803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2010) The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185(3):1021–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson J, Endelman J, Heslot N (2013) The use of unbalanced historical data for genomic selection in an international wheat breeding program. F Crop Res 154:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E et al (2009) Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182(1):375–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Endelman JB (2011) Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4(3):250–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endelman JB, Atlin GN, Beyene Y, Semagn K, Zhang X, Sorrells ME et al (2014) Optimal design of preliminary yield trials with genome-wide markers. Crop Sci 54(1):48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM et al (2012) Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci 95(7):4114–4129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fè D, Cericola F, Byrne S, Lenk I, Ashraf BH, Pedersen MG et al (2015) Genomic dissection and prediction of heading date in perennial ryegrass. BMC Genomics 16(1):921

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geladi P, Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gianola D, Van Kaam JBCHM (2008) Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 178(4):2289–2303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gorjanc G, Jenko J, Hearne SJ, Hickey JM (2016) Initiating maize pre-breeding programs using genomic selection to harness polygenic variation from landrace populations. BMC Genomics 17(1):30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ (2011) Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12:186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol 42(1):5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi T, Iwata H (2010) EM algorithm for Bayesian estimation of genomic breeding values. BMC Genet 11:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Schulthess AW, Mirdita V, Zhao Y, Korzun V, Bothe R et al (2016) Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population. Theor Appl Genet 129(3):641–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner EL, Jannink JL, Iwata H, Souza E, Sorrells ME (2011a) Genomic selection accuracy for grain quality traits in biparental wheat populations. Crop Sci 51(6):2597–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner EL, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2011b) Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 4(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner EL, Lorenz AJ, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2010) Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci 50(5):1681–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heslot N, Akdemir D, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2014) Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theor Appl Genet 127(2):463–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heslot N, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME (2015) Perspectives for genomic selection applications and research in plants. Crop Sci 55(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heslot N, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2013a) Using genomic prediction to characterize environments and optimize prediction accuracy in applied breeding data. Crop Sci 53(3):921–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heslot N, Rutkoski J, Poland J, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2013b) Impact of marker ascertainment bias on genomic selection accuracy and estimates of genetic diversity. PLoS One 8(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslot N, Yang H-PP, Sorrells MEMEME, Jannink J-LL (2012) Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci 52(1):146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey JM, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Hearne S, Babu R, Prasanna BM et al (2014) Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation. Crop Sci 54(4):1476–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isidro J, Jannink J-L, Akdemir D, Poland J, Heslot N, Sorrells ME (2015) Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 128:145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarquín D, Crossa J, Lacaze X, Du Cheyron P, Daucourt J, Lorgeou J et al (2014) A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data. Theor Appl Genet 127(3):595–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y, Jannink JL (2012) Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy. Genetics 192(4):1513–1522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Reif JC (2015) Modeling epistasis in genomic selection. Genetics 201(2):759–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Rodemann B, Plieske J, Kollers S, Korzun V et al (2015) Potential and limits to unravel the genetic architecture and predict the variation of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Heredity (Edinb) 114:318–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lado B, González Barrios P, Quincke M, Silva P, Gutiérrez L (2016) Modeling genotype x environment interaction for genomic selection with unbalanced data from a wheat breeding program. Crop Sci 56(April):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Longin CFH, Mi X, Würschum T (2015) Genomic selection in wheat: optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for line and hybrid breeding. Theor Appl Genet Springer Berlin Heidelberg 128(7):1297–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Cruz M, Crossa J, Bonnett D, Dreisigacker S, Poland J, Jannink J-LJ et al (2015) Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker x environment interaction genomic selection model. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 5(4):569–582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz AJ (2013 Mar) Resource allocation for maximizing prediction accuracy and genetic gain of genomic selection in plant breeding: a simulation experiment. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 3(3):481–491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz AJ, Chao S, Asoro FG, Heffner EL, Hayashi T, Iwata H et al (2011) Genomic selection in plant breeding. Adv Agron 110:77–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz AJ, Smith KP, Jannink JL (2012) Potential and optimization of genomic selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in six-row barley. Crop Sci 52(4):1609–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martre P, Jamieson PD, Semenov MA, Zyskowski RF, Porter JR, Triboi E (2006) Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat. Eur J Agron 25(2):138–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4):1819–1829

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mirdita V, He S, Zhao Y, Korzun V, Bothe R, Ebmeyer E et al (2015) Potential and limits of whole genome prediction of resistance to Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in a vast Central European elite winter wheat population. Theor Appl Genet 128(12):2471–2481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Crossa J, Toledo F, Pérez-Hernández O, Eskridge KM et al (2016) A genomic bayesian multi-trait and multi-environment model. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 6(9):2725–2744

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muir WM (2007) Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124(6):342–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ornella L, Singh S, Perez P, Burgueño J, Singh R, Tapia E et al (2012) Genomic prediction of genetic values for resistance to wheat rusts. Plant Genome J 5(3):136–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park T, Casella G, Ark TP, Asella GC (2008) The Bayesian lasso. J Am Stat Assoc 103(482):681–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Rodriguez P, Gianola D, Gonzalez-Camacho JM, Crossa J, Manes Y, Dreisigacker S (2013) Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 2(12):1595–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez P, de los Campos G, Crossa J, Gianola D (2010) Genomic-enabled prediction based on molecular markers and pedigree using the Bayesian linear regression package in R. Plant Genome 3(2):106–116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Podlich DW, Cooper M, Basford KE (1999) Computer simulation of a selection strategy to accommodate genotype-environment interactions in a wheat recurrent selection programme. Plant Breed 118(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland J, Endelman J, Dawson J, Rutkoski J, Wu S, Manes Y et al (2012) Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Genome J 5(3):103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL (2012) Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J Dairy Sci 95(1):389–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rife TW, Wu S, Bowden R, Poland JA (2015) Spiked GBS: a unified, open platform for single marker genotyping and whole-genome profiling. BMC Genomics 16(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski J, Benson J, Jia Y, Brown-Guedira G, Jannink J-L, Sorrells M (2012) Evaluation of genomic prediction methods for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Plant Genome J 5(2):51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski J, Poland J, Mondal S, Autrique E, González Párez L, Crossa JJ et al (2016) Canopy temperature and vegetation indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 6(9):2799–2808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Poland J, Jannink JL et al (2015a) Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat. Plant Genome 8(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Poland J, Jannink JL et al (2015b) Efficient use of historical data for genomic selection: a case study of stem rust resistance in wheat. Plant Genome 8(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski JE, Poland JA, Singh RP, Huerta-espino J, Barbier H, Rouse MN et al (2014) Genomic selection for quantitative adult plant stem rust resistance in wheat. Plant Genome 7(3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoski JE, Poland J, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME, Breeding P, York N (2013) Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 3(3):427–439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sallam AH, Endelman JB, Jannink J-L, Smith KP (2015) Assessing genomic selection prediction accuracy in a dynamic barley breeding population. Plant Genome 8(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Kollers S, Maasberg-Prelle A, Großer J, Schinkel B, Tomerius A et al (2016) Prediction of malting quality traits in barley based on genome-wide marker data to assess the potential of genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet 129(2):203–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulthess AW, Wang Y, Miedaner T, Wilde P, Reif JC, Zhao Y (2016) Multiple-trait- and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes. Theor Appl Genet 129(2):273–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storlie E, Charmet G (2013) Genomic selection accuracy using historical data generated in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 6(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technow F, Messina CD, Totir LR, Cooper M (2015) Integrating crop growth models with whole genome prediction through approximate Bayesian computation. PLoS One 10(6):e0130855

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thavamanikumar S, Dolferus R, Thumma BR (2015) Comparison of genomic selection models to predict flowering time and spike grain number in two hexaploid wheat doubled haploid populations. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 5(October):1991–1998

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R (1996) Regression selection and shrinkage via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B 128:267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Mette MF, Miedaner T, Gottwald M, Wilde P, Reif JC et al (2014) The accuracy of prediction of genomic selection in elite hybrid rye populations surpasses the accuracy of marker-assisted selection and is equally augmented by multiple field evaluation locations and test years. BMC Genomics 15(1):556

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Rakszegi M, Bedő Z, Shewry PR, Mackay I (2015) Differentially penalized regression to predict agronomic traits from metabolites and markers in wheat. BMC Genet 16(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White J, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM et al (2012) Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. F Crop Res 133:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker JC, Thompson R, Denham MC (2000) Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression. Genet Res 75(2):249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S (2007) An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci. Biometrics 63(2):513–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Sallam A, Gao L, Kantarski T, Poland J, DeHaan LR et al (2016) Establishment and optimization of genomic selection to accelerate the domestication and improvement of intermediate wheatgrass. Plant Genome 9(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Li Z, Liu G, Jiang Y, Maurer HP, Würschum T et al (2015) Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(51):15624–15629

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Mette MF, Gowda M, Longin CFH, Reif JC (2014) Bridging the gap between marker-assisted and genomic selection of heading time and plant height in hybrid wheat. Heredity (Edinb) 112(6):638–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic-net. J R Stat Soc 67(2):301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Programs, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Jessica E. Rutkoski

  2. Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Jared Crain & Jesse Poland

  3. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA

    Mark E. Sorrells

Authors
  1. Jessica E. Rutkoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jared Crain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jesse Poland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark E. Sorrells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Sorrells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence in Genomics, Research Program - Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Telangana, India

    Rajeev K. Varshney

  2. Center of Excellence in Genomics, Research Program - Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Telangana, India

    Manish Roorkiwal

  3. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Mark E. Sorrells

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rutkoski, J.E., Crain, J., Poland, J., Sorrells, M.E. (2017). Genomic Selection for Small Grain Improvement. In: Varshney, R., Roorkiwal, M., Sorrells, M. (eds) Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63170-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation