Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Introduction to Anticipation Studies

Part of the book series: Anticipation Science ((ANTISC,volume 1))

  • 615 Accesses

Abstract

Futures Study is the field that during the past 60 years has more than any other systematically dealt with the future. This chapter presents anticipation as the third level of futures studies, after forecast and foresight modeling, and connects anticipation with related issues such as utopias and future-generating research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaltonen, M. (2010). Robustness: Anticipatory and adaptive human systems. Litchfield Park, AZ: Isce Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abensour, M. (1999). William Morris: The politics of romance. In M. Blechman (Ed.), Revolutionary romanticism. San Francisco, CL: City Lights Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of modernity. The environment and invisible hazards. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2004). Towards a new sociology of the future. Retrieved from http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/futures/newsociologyofthefuture.pdf.

  • Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amara, R. (1981). The futures field: Searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist, 15(1), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In M. Walton & V. Rao (Eds.), Culture and public action: A cross-disciplinary dialogue on development policy. Palo Alto, CL: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of futures studies. New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, G. (1964). Phénoménologie du temps et prospective. Paris: Presses universitaire de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1990). The croocked timber of humanity. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojer, M. M., Roehl, H., & Knuth, M. (2008). Mapping dialogue: Essential tools for social change. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournand, A., & Levy, M. (1973). Shaping the future: Gaston Berger and the concept of prospective. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1958). Out of utopia: Towards a reorientation of sociological analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jouvenel, B. (1967). The art of conjecture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1973). Towards a social ecology: Contextual appreciation of the future in the present. London/New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (2010). From teams to knots. Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flechtheim, O. (1943). Futurologie. In J. Ritter, K. Gründer, & G. Gabriel (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Schwabe & Co Verlag: Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flechtheim, O. (1966). History and futurology. Verlag Anton: Meisenheim am Glan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45(3), 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, B., Finne, H., & Oscarrson, B. (Eds.). (2001). Creating connectedness: The role of social research in innovation policy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Z. (2014). The social labs revolution: A new approach to solving our most complex problems. San Francisco, CL: Berrett-Koehler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, S. (2004). The causal layered analysis (CLA) reader. Tamsui, Taiwan: Tamkang University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4–21. doi:10.1108/14636680810855991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (2005). Picture imperfect: Utopian thought for an anti-utopian age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. (1963). Utopia and its enemies. Glencoe, Scotland: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketonen, O. (2009). Knowing about the future. Futura, 28(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L. (1982). The death of utopia reconsidered. The Tanner lectures on human values: Delivered at the Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. J., Harmon, J., Yorks, L., & Kowalski, D. (2003). Reducing workplace stress and aggression: An action research project at the US Department of veteran affairs. Human Resource Planning, 26, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krawczyk, E., & Slaughter, R. (2010). New generations of futures methods. Futures, 42(1), 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2014). Utopia as method. The imaginary reconstitution of society. New York: Palmgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43, 130–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaska, P., & Masini, E. (2009). Philosophical essays of knowledge of the future. Futura, 28(1), 3–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, R. J., & Grant, D. (2008). Organizational discourse and new organization practices. British Journal of Management, 19, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini, E. (1993). Why futures studies? London: Grey Seal Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini, E. (2009). Luis de Molina as a precursor of the basis for philosophical and ethical thinking in futures studies. Futura, 28(1), 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermet, L. (2009). Extending the perimeter of reflexive debate on futures research: An open framework. Futures, 41, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mermet, L., Fuller, T., & van der Helm, R. (2009). Re-examining and renewing theoretical underpinnings of the futures field: A pressing and long-term challenge. Futures, 41(2), 67–70. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2006). From trends to futures literacy. Reclaiming the future. Paper presented at the Centre for Strategic Education, Seminar Series Paper No. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2011). Futures literacy. Embracing complexity and using the future. Ethos, 10(October), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2012). Anticipation: The discipline of uncertainty. In A. Curry (Ed.), The future of futures. Association of Professional Futurists: Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., Poli, R., & Rossel, P. (2017). The discipline of anticipation. Exploring key issues. In R. Miller (Ed.), Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century. UNESCO and Routledge: Paris/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2006). The ontology of what is not there. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 91, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2011a). Ontological categories Latents and the irrational. In J. Cumpa & E. Tegtmeier (Eds.), Ontological categories (pp. 153–163). Heusenhamm: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2011b). Step toward an explicit ontology of the future. Journal of Future Studies, 16(1), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2013a). Les signaux faibles, une propension sociale spontanée. Cahiers de la sécurité, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2013b). Overcoming divides. On the Horizon, 21(1), 3–14. doi:10.1108/10748121311297021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Sage handbook of action research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1998). Predicting the future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, L. T. (2011). Utopianism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, R. A. (2004). Futures beyond dystopia: Creating social foresight. London/New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K., & Goodwin, B. (2009). The politics of utopia. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1977). William Morris: Romantic to revolutionary. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2013). Next-generation foresight in anticipatory organizations. Paper presented at the European Forum on Forward-Looking Activities (EFFLA). European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voros, J. (2001). A primer on futures studies, foresight and the use of scenarios. Prospect. The Foresight Bulletin, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. S. (2008). Scanning beyond the horizon: Exploring the ontological and epistemological basis for scenario planning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(2), 147–165. doi:10.1177/1523422307304101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamba, N. G. (2011). Developing an alternative epistemology of practice: Teacher’s action research as critical pedagogy. Action Research, 9, 162–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Konig, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and assessment for guidance. Health Technology Assessment, 5(23), iii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology and social research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Roberto Poli

Authors
  1. Roberto Poli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poli, R. (2017). Understanding the Future. In: Introduction to Anticipation Studies. Anticipation Science, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63023-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation