Advertisement

Strabismus pp 23-29 | Cite as

Refraction

  • Burton J. Kushner
Chapter

Abstract

I am aware that many colleagues do cycloplegic refractions on all children, but in adults they only perform dry (manifest) refractions. There are several reasons for this. In patients with early nuclear sclerosis, dilation may compromise visual acuity testing. Also, in hyperopic patients it can be hard to predict how much latent hyperopia is present, and how much of the plus they will tolerate. But I find that many adult patients with strabismus (usually esotropes but not exclusively so) do “funny” things with respect to accommodation; they may not relax it during a dry refraction in the same way as non-strabismic patients do. I recall one patient who was referred to me for strabismus surgery in her late 40s. She had a history of accommodative esotropia (ET) that had been controlled for many years, but over the prior 10 years her eye began to increasingly cross. She had undergone five refractions over the prior 10 years, having seen five different comprehensive ophthalmologists, all of whom performed dry refractions; they did dilate her for fundoscopy. Although my dry refraction was close to what she was currently wearing in her spectacles, my cycloplegic refraction revealed three additional diopters of hyperopia. She was incrementally given more hyperopic correction which eliminated her ET and brought great relief from the asthenopia she was experiencing with visual tasks.

Keywords

Anisometropia Contact lens bifocals Contact lenses Cycloplegia Monovision Refraction 

References

  1. 1.
    Kushner BJ. The effect of oblique muscle surgery on the axis of astigmatism. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1986;23:277–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morton GV, Kushner BJ, Lucchese NJ, Shapiro MB, Bredeson DC. The efficacy of SimulVue and Unilens RGP aspheric bifocal contact lenses in the treatment of esotropia associated with a high accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio. J AAPOS. 1998;2:108–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright WW, Gotzler KC, Guyton DL. Esotropia associated with early presbyopia caused by inappropriate muscle length adaptation. J AAPOS. 2005;9:563–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kushner BJ, West C. Monovision may be detrimental to patients with strabismus. In: Balkan RJ, Ellis Jr GS, Eustis HS, editors. At the crossings. Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. Proceedings of the 52nd annual symposium of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. The Hague: Kugler; 2004. p. 77–86.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jampolsky AJ. Unequal vision inputs and strabismus management: A comparison of human and animal strabismus. Symposium on strabismus: transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1978. p. 358–492.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kushner B. Optical problems and near vision. Am Orthopt J. 1999;49:31–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burton J. Kushner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations