Skip to main content

Eastern Borderland of the Baltic States as the External Border of Schengen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Borders in Central Europe After the Schengen Agreement

Abstract

This article is focused on the eastern borderland of the Baltic States (in particular Estonia and Latvia), which is the eastern borderland of the EU and Schengen space at the same time. The specificities of the Baltic eastern borderland are related to its historical formation—this territory has been a borderland between European and Russian space for many centuries and can be perceived as a homogenous territory. However, several factors of the Baltic eastern borderland indicate that this territory includes various territories in terms of their position in the hierarchy of centres and regions, physiogeographical particularities, transport and communication networks, political orientation, local activities and historical events. This mixture of factors has formed specific regional and territories identities along the eastern borderland of the Baltic States. These factors are analysed in more detail in the cases of the Ida-Viru and Latgale regions in Estonia and Latvia, respectively. Both regions have important Russian-speaking communities and are under difficult sociocultural and economic conditions. However, the reasons for their current situation are different. Ida-Virumaa is an urbanized, industrial administrative unit affected by a decrease in industrial production and in living conditions of its population (predominantly Russian newcomers). Latgale is a backward peripheral region formed by its historical development under different states (Russia, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, etc.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Riga and Tallinn, the capitals of Estonia and Latvia, as well as several other cities in both countries also have a high share of the Russian-speaking minority. However, they do not form functional regions with a dominance of the Russian-speaking minority, as Ida-Viru and Latgale regions do.

References

  • Adams, N., Ezmale, S., Paalzow, A. (2006). Towards balanced development in Latvia: The experience of the Latgale Region. In N. Adams, J. Alden, N. Harris (Eds.), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union (pp. 199–220). Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abyzov, J. (2002). Pribaltika – glazami Rossiyanina. In D. E. Furman & E. G. Zadorozhnyuk (Eds.), Strany Baltii i Rossia: obshchestva i gosudarstva (pp. 419–438). Moskva: Izdatelstvo Referendum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E. (2007). Where East meets the West? Baltic States in Search of New Identity. In T. Hayashi et al. (Eds.), Regions in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Present (Slavic Eurasian Studies No. 15) (pp. 49–67). Sapporo: Slavic Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E., & Oras, S. (2000). Writing Post-Soviet Estonia onto the World Map. Political Geography, 19, 601–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blažek, J. (1996). Meziregionální rozdíly v České republice v transformačním období. (Inter-Regional Disparities in Czechia during the Transition). Geografie, 101(4), 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blažek, J., & Csank, P. (2007). Nová fáze regionálního rozvoje v ČR? (A New Phase of Regional Development in Czechia?). Czech Sociological Review, 43(5), 945–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burneika, D. (2004). Regioniniai bendrosios ūkio būklės skirtumai ir jų kaita Lietuvoje. (Regional disparities and their transformation in the economy od Lithuania). Geografija 40(1), 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burneika, D. (2007). Economic aspects of regional disparities in Lithuania. Ģeogrāfiski raksti, 13, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihelková, E. (2002). Světová ekonomika – regiony a integrace. (World Economy—Regions and Integration). Praha: Grada Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. P. (1996). Geography of the World’s major regions. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Čede, P., & Fleck, D. (1996). Der Mitteleuropabegriff. Entwicklung und Wandel unter dem Einfluss zeitspezifischer Geisteshaltungen. Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Geographie der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, 34, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Blij, H. J., & Muller, P. O. (2002). Geography. Realms, regions and concepts. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann, J. I. (2001). Distribution of foreign direct investments among transition economies in central and Eastern Europe. Post-Soviet Geography & Economics, 42(2), 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokoupil, J. (2000). Teoretické přístupy k problematice pohraničí s aplikací v česko-bavorském prostoru. (Theoretical Approaches to the Issues of Borderland with an Application in the Bohemian-Bavarian Space). Geografie, 105(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesti statistika. (2010). http://www.stat.ee. Accessed 15 September 2010.

  • Fritsch, M. (2009). European Territorialization and the Eastern Neighbourhood: Spatial Development Co-operation between the EU and Russia. European Journal of Spatial Development 35, www.nordregio.se/EJSD

  • Hampl, M. (1996). Geografická organizace společnosti a transformační procesy v České republice. (Geographical Organisation of the Society and Transformation Processes in Czechia). Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampl, M. (2000). Pohraniční regiony České republiky: současné tendence rozvojové diferenciace. (Borderland Regions in Czechia: Current Tendencies of Regional Differentiation). Geografie – Sborník České geografické společnosti 105(3), 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampl, M. (2005). Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. (Geographical Organization of the Society in the Czech Republic: Transformational Processes and Their General Context). Praha, Univerzita Karlova: Přírodovědecká fakulta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlíček, T. (2003). Religiózní struktury a procesy v makroregionech světa. (Religious Structures and Processes in World Macroregions). In V. Jančák, P. Chromý, & M. Marada (Eds.), Geografie na cestách poznání (pp. 150–162). Praha: Univerzita Karlova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlíček, T., Chromý, P., Jančák, V., & Marada, M. (2005). Vybrané teoreticko-metodologické aspekty a trendy geografického výzkumu periferních oblastí. (Selected theoretical-methodological aspects and trends of geographical research of peripheral regions). In M. Novotná (Ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí (pp. 6–24). Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hučka, M., Kutscherauer, A., Tománek, P., Sucháček, J., & Tvrdoň, M. (2008). Regionální disparity (Regional Disparities), Working Papers 2, VŠ báňská - TU Ostrava, Slezská univerzita v Opavě.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. H., Hudman, L. E. (1990). World Regional Geography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeřábek, M. (2000). Tematický vstup – pohraničí v regionálním rozvoji a jeho výzkum. (A Thematic Introduction—Borderland in Regional Development and Its Research). Geografie – Sborník České geografické společnosti 105(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeřábek, M., Dokoupil, J., & Havlíček, T. et al. (2004). České pohraničí – bariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? (Czech Borderlands—Barrier, or a Space of Transmission?) (p. 304). Praha: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R., & Nikiforova, E. (2006). Borderland spaces of identification and dis/location: Multiscalar narratives and enactment of Seto identity and place in the Estonian-Russian Borderlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(5), 928–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latvijas statistika. (2010). http://www.csb.gov.lv. Accessed 15 June 2010.

  • Lösch, A. (1962). Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madeley, J. T. S. (2003). A framework for the comparative analysis of church-state relations in Europe. West European Politics, 26(1), 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marszał, T. (2008). Metropolitan processes in Central and Eastern Europe. European Spatial Research and Policy, 15(2), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miškovský, J. (2009). Borderland in Post-Socialist Central European and Baltic States. In S. Vaitekūnas, A. Bučinskas, & L. Šimanskienė (Eds.), Social Sciences in Global World: Possibilities, challenges and perspectives (Bridges—Supplementary Issue 39) (pp. 92–98). Klaipėda: Klaipėda University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miškovský, J. (2012). Regionální identita a regionální diferenciace pobaltských států. (Regional Identity and Regional Differentiation of the Baltic States). Dissertation thesis. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, J. (2001). Geopolitical visions of Central Europe. In M. Antonsich, V. Kolossov, & M. P. Pagnini (Eds.), Europe between geopolitics and political geography (pp. 607–628). Rome: Societa Geografica Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paalzow, A. (2006). Barriers to regional development in the new member States: The Latvian experience. In N. Adams, J. Alden, & N. Harris (Eds.), Regional development and spatial planning in an enlarged European Union (pp. 181–198). Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlínek, P. (2004). Regional development implications of foreign direct investments in central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penck, A. (1918). Die natürlichen Grenzen Rußlands. In: Meereskunde, H. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaat, J. (2003). Religious change in Estonia and the Baltic States during the Soviet Period in comparative perspective. Journal of Baltic Studies, 34(1), 52–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1987). Territorial structures in Western Europe: An overview and a possible model. In S. Rokkan, D. Urwin, F. H. Aarebrot, P. Malaba, & T. Sande (Eds.), Centre-periphery structures in Europe. An ISSC workbook in comparative analysis (pp. 51–105). Frankfurt—New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1999). State formation and nation-building. In P. Flora, S. Kuhnle, & D. Urwin (Eds.), State formation, nation-building, and mass politics in Europe. The Theory of Stein Rokkan (pp. 93–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slišāns, I. (2000). Latgales reģions un tā robežu jautājuma dažādie aspekti. (Region of Latgale and various aspects of its border issue). In Jauns gadsimts – jauna ģeogrāfija. Rīga, Latvijas Ģeogrāfijas biedrība.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smagars, A. (2003). Latgale’s “No” to the European Union—The reasons behind the Divide. http://politika.lv/en/topics/quality_in_politics/15777/

  • Smith, D. J. (2002). Narva region within the Estonian Republic: From Authonomism to Accommodation? In J. Batt, & K. Wolczuk (Eds.), Region, state and identity in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Frank Cass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spišiak, P. (2001). Geografické aspekty euroregiónov Slovenska. (Geographical Aspects of Euroregions in Slovakia). Plzeň: Miscellanea geographica 9, pp. 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švec, L. (1998). Postavení pobaltských států v postsovětském prostoru v polovině 90. let (Position of the Baltic States in the Post-Soviet Space in the Half of the 1990s). In B. Litera et al. (Ed.), Vzájemné vztahy postsovětských republik. Praha: Ústav mezinárodních vztahů.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švec, L., Macura, V., & Štoll, P. (1996). Dějiny pobaltských zemí. (History of the Baltic Countries). Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. (2011). Albert, Martin, and Peter Too: Their roles in creating the Estonian and Latvian Nations. Journal of Baltic Studies, 42(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaitekūnas, S. (1992). Geopolitics in Lithuania. In Geography in Lithuania/Geografija Lietuvoje, Vilnius, pp. 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen, J. (2002). Place and discourse in the formation of the Northeast Estonian Borderland. Boundaries and Place (pp. 239–254). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zájedová, I. (2006). Pobaltská regionální spolupráce. (The Baltic Regional Cooperation). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Nakladatelství Karolinum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josef Miškovský .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miškovský, J. (2018). Eastern Borderland of the Baltic States as the External Border of Schengen. In: Havlíček, T., Jeřábek, M., Dokoupil, J. (eds) Borders in Central Europe After the Schengen Agreement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63016-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63016-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63015-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63016-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics