A Critical Analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Ranjula Bali SwainEmail author
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


The ambitious UN-adopted sustainable development goals (SDGs) have been criticized for being inconsistent, difficult to quantify, implement and monitor. Disparaging analysis suggests that there exists a potential inconsistency in the SDGs, particularly between the socio-economic development and the environmental sustainability goals. Critiques also raise questions on the measurability and monitoring of the broadly framed SDGs. The goals are non-binding, with each country being expected to create their own national or regional plans. Moreover, the source(s) and the extent of the financial resources and investments for the SDGs are ambiguous. This chapter quantifies and examines the inconsistencies of the SDGs. It further inspects which of the underlying social, economic or environmental pillars are that most effective for achieving sustainable development. Analyses of the data reveal that the developed countries need to remain focused on their social and environmental policies. The developing countries, on the other hand, are better off being focused on their economics and social policies in the short run, even though environmental policies remain significant for sustainable development.


Sustainable development goals Sustainable development incompatibility Structural equation modelling Factor analysis UN data revolution 



I thankfully acknowledge the financial support from the Swedish Research Councils (Vetenskapsrådet and Formas).


  1. Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K. (2012). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environmental Development Economics, 17, 317–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bali Swain, R., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2017). The Sustainable development quagmire: Quantifying the sustainable development goals. Unpublished draft, Södertörn University & Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  3. Campaginolo, L., Carraro, C., Eboli, F., & Farnia, L. (2015). Assessing SDGs: A new methodology to measure sustainability. FEEM Nota di Lavoro, 89.Google Scholar
  4. Céline, E., Philippe, M., Astrid, V., Catherine, B., Musampa, C., & Pierre, D. (2013). National forest cover change in Congo Basin: Deforestation, reforestation, degradation and regeneration for the years 1990, 2000 and 2005. Global Change Biology, 19, 1173–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Development in OECD. (2004). Measuring sustainable development: Integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human well-being and the natural environment (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta, P. (2013). The nature of economic development and the economic development of nature. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. CWPE 1349. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Eagle, N., Macy, M., & Claxton, R. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328, 5981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterly, W. (2015). The trouble with the sustainable development goals. Current History, November 2015, p. 322–325. Google Scholar
  10. Elvidge, C., et al. (2009). A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Computers & Geosciences, 35(8), 1652–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaveau, D. L. A., Linkie, M., Suyadi, Levang, P., & Leader-Williams, N. (2009). Three decades of deforestation in southwest Sumatra: Effects of coffee prices, law enforcement and rural poverty. Biological Conservation, 142, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giovannini, E. (Ed.). (1995). Social statistics, national accounts and economic analysis, Proceedings of the international conference in memory of Sir Richard Stone, Annali di Statistica, Serie X (Vol. 6) Roma, Italy: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Google Scholar
  13. Green Growth Knowledge Platform (GGKP). (2016). Measuring inclusive green growth at the country level—Taking stock of measurement approaches and indicators. GGKP Research Committee on Measurement & Indicators.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, K., Loh, J., Sayre, J., Thouvenot, T., & Wackernagel, M. (2004). Accounting for sustainable development: Complementary monetary and biophysical approaches. In OECD, measuring sustainable development: Integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, K., & Clemens, M. (1999). Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ICSU and ISSC. (2015). In A. S. Stevance, J. Mengel, D. Young, G. Glaser, C. Symon (Eds.), Review of the sustainable development goals: The science perspective. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar
  17. IPCC. (2007). In R. K. Pachauri, A. Reisinger (Eds.), Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change core writing team, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. pp 104.Google Scholar
  18. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report topic 3: Future pathways for adaption, mitigation and sustainable development.Google Scholar
  19. Jorgenson, A. K. (2010). World-economic integration, supply depots, and environmental degradation: A study of ecologically unequal exchange, foreign investment dependence, and deforestation in less developed countries. Critical Sociology, 36, 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenny, C. (2015). ‘SDG targets: Here’s how to make them stronger. March 23, 2015.
  21. Kroll, C. (2015). Sustainable development goals: Are the rich countries ready? Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  22. Letouze, E. (2015). Big data and development: An overview data, Pop Alliance Data—Pop Alliance Primer Series, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Lomborg, B. (2014). The United Nations needs a shorter, stronger game plan for humanity. The Washington Post, 21 November,
  24. Lutz, E. (Ed.). (1993). Toward improved accounting for the environment. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  25. Managi, S., & Kaneko, S. (2009). Chinese economic development and the environment. Cheltham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicolai, S., Hoy, C., Berliner, T., & Aedy, T. (2015). Projecting progress: Reaching the SDGs by 2030. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2012). Can earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection. Ecological Economics, 75, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordhaus, W., & Kokkelenberg, E. (Eds.). (1999). Nature’s numbers: Expanding the national economic accounts to include the environment. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  29. Obersteiner, M., Walsh, B., Frank, S., Havlík, P., Cantele, M., Liu, J., et al. (2016). Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the sustainable development goals. Science Advances, 2(9), e1501499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD. (2004). Measuring sustainable development: Integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2008). OECD environmental outlook to 2030. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD. (2014). Development cooperation report 2014: Mobilising resources for sustainable development. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 38, 7850–7860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Pearce, D. W., & Atkinson, G. (1993). Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics, 8, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierantoni, I. (2004). A few remarks on methodological aspects related to sustainable development in OECD 2004. Measuring sustainable development: Integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks. Paris: OECD. Google Scholar
  37. Ranganathan, S., Bali Swain, R., & Sumpter, D. (2015). The demographic transition and economic growth: implications for development policy. Palgrave Communications, 1(15033), 2015.Google Scholar
  38. Ranganathan, S., Nicolis, S. C., Bali Swain, R., & Sumpter, D. (2017). Setting development goals using stochastic dynamical system models. PLOS One (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  39. Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Redclift, M. (2010). Development and the environmental crisis: Red or green alternatives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Repetto, R., Magrath, W., Wells, M., Beer, C., & Rossini, F. (1989). Wasting assets: Natural resources in the national income accounts. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Rich, B. (2013). Mortgaging the earth: The World Bank, environmental impoverishment, and the crisis of development. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodriguez-Takeuchi, L. (2014). The ‘X-File’ and the Need for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems Post- 2015. London: ODI.Google Scholar
  44. Rodríguez-Pose, R., & Samuels, F. (2015). Rwanda’s progress in health: Leadership, performance and health insurance. London: ODI.Google Scholar
  45. Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Durand-Delacre, D., & Teksoz, K. (2016). An SDG index and dashboards—Global report. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).Google Scholar
  46. Spaiser, V., Ranganathan, S., Bali Swain, R., & Sumpter, D. (2016). The sustainable development oxymoron: Quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. online September 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Smith-Clarke, C., Mashhadi, A., & Capra, L. (2014). Poverty on the cheap: Estimating poverty maps using aggregated mobile communication networks. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
  48. Steele, J., Sundsøy, P. R., Pezzulo, C., Alegana, V. A., Bird, T. J., Blumenstock, J., et al. (2017). Mapping poverty using mobile phone and satellite data. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 14(127), 20160690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24, 1151–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stuart, E., Samman, E., Avis, W. and Berliner, T. (2015). The data revolution: Finding the missing millions. London: ODI.Google Scholar
  51. UNICEF. (2013). Every child’s birth right: Inequities and trends in birth registration. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  52. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21.Google Scholar
  53. United Nations. (2014). A world that counts mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development, Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development, 2014.Google Scholar
  54. United Nations. (2015). Global sustainable development report, 2015 edition. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar
  55. UN Global Pulse. (2015). Using mobile phone data and airtime credit purchases to estimate food security. New York: UN World Food Programme (WFP), Université Catholique de Louvain, Real Impact Analytics, Pulse Lab New York.Google Scholar
  56. UN SDSN. (2015). Data for development. A needs assessment for SDG monitoring and statistical capacity development. New York: UN SDSN.Google Scholar
  57. van Vuuren, D. P., Kok, M., Lucas, P. L., Prins, A. G., Alkemade, R., van den Berg, M., et al. (2015). Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technology Forecasting Social Change, 98, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Bank (WB). (2012). Inclusive green growth: The pathway to sustainable development. New York. Home Boards About Subscribe Journal GP Events Themes Comment & Opinion Media Contribute Terms and Conditions and Privacy.Google Scholar
  59. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Brundtland Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm School of EconomicsSödertörn UniversityHuddingeSweden

Personalised recommendations