Advertisement

The Localities of Mediatization: How Organizations Translate Mediatization into Everyday Practices

  • Magnus Fredriksson
  • Josef Pallas
Chapter
Part of the Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research book series (TCSCMR)

Abstract

In this chapter, we suggest a perspective where mediatization is addressed as a set of rationalized ideas that are actively translated and transformed in and by organizations and their members. Through local translations, these ideas not only shape contemporary organizations but also are re-constructed in these. We argue that ideas are carried into and between organizations by different elements that are interpreted, made sense of and negotiated depending on the characteristics of the ideas at hand, and the characteristics of the context into which they are introduced. To unpack how mediatization unfolds inside organizations, we turn to a specific stream of Scandinavian institutionalism: translation theory. Thereby, we identify translation processes of mediatization as taking place in a context of competing and conflicting value systems—especially those represented by different professions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter was written as a part of our project “Management structures and mediatization of governmental agencies—translations and consequences”, funded by the Swedish Research Council.

References

  1. Ahrne, Göran, and Nils Brunsson. 2011. Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization 18 (1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altheide, David L., and Robert P. Snow. 1979. Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Asp, Kent. 2014. News media logic in a new institutional perspective. Journalism Studies 15 (3): 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benders, Jos, and Mark Van Bijsterveld. 2000. Leaning on lean: The reception of a management fashion in Germany. New Technology, Work and Employment 15 (1): 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bévort, Frans, and Roy Suddaby. 2015. Scripting professional identities: How individuals make sense of contradictory institutional logics. Journal of Professions and Organization 3 (1): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brants, Kees, and Philip van Praag. 2006. Signs of media logic: Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost—The Public 13 (1): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brants, Kees, and Philip van Praag. 2015. Beyond the media logic. Journalism Studies 18 (4): 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies 21 (4): 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?, ed. John Law, 196–233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Couldry, Nick. 2012. Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2016. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press/Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Czarniawska, Barbara, and Bernward Joerges. 1996. Travels of ideas. In Translating organizational change, ed. Barbara Czarniawska, and Guje Sevón, 13–48. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Czarniawska, Barbara, and Tor Hernes. 2005. Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  14. Czarniawska, Barbara, and Guje Sevón. 1996. Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czarniawska, Barbara, and Guje Sevón. 2005. Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy. Malmö: Libris.Google Scholar
  16. Diedrich, Andreas, Ulla Eriksson-Zetterquist, Lena Ewertsson, Johan Hagberg, Anette Hallin, Fredrik Lavén, Kajsa Lindberg, Elena Raviola, Egle Rindzeviciute, and Lars Walter. 2013. Exploring the performativity turn in management studies. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Djelic, Marie-Laure. 1998. Exporting the American model: The post-war transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donges, Patrick, and Otfried Jarren. 2014. Mediatization of political organizations: Changing parties and interest groups. In Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies, ed. Frank Esser, and Jesper Strömbäck, 181–199. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ekström, Mats, Johan Fornäs, André Jansson, and Anne Jerslev. 2016. Three tasks for mediatization research: Contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture and Society 38 (7): 1090–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Esser, Frank. 2013. Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, Sandra Lavenex, Marc Bühlmann, and Frank Esser, 155–176. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esser, Frank, and Jörg Matthes. 2013. Mediatization effects on political news, political actors, political decisions, and political audiences. In Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, Sandra Lavenex, Marc Bühlmann, and Frank Esser, 177–201. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Esser, Frank, and Jesper Strömbäck. 2014. Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredriksson, Magnus, and Josef Pallas. 2017. Translated inconsistency: Management communication under the reign of institutional ambiguity. Management Communication Quarterly. 37 (11): 1661–1684.Google Scholar
  25. Fredriksson, Magnus, and Josef Pallas. 2014. Media enactments: Where to look for inspiration in mediatization studies. In Organizations and the media. Organizing in a mediatized world, ed. Josef Pallas, Stefan Jonsson, and Lars Strannegård, 234–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Friedland, Roger, and Robert R. Alford. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. Walter W. Powell, and Paul J. DiMaggio, 232–266. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Greenwood, Royston, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, and Roy Suddaby. 2008. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haßler, Jörg, Marcus Maurer, and Corinna Oschatz. 2014. Media logic and political logic online and offline. Journalism Practice 8 (3): 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hjarvard, Stig. 2008. The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review 29 (2): 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hjarvard, Stig, and Mia Lövheim. 2012. Mediatization and religion: Nordic perspectives. European Journal of Communication 28 (2): 214–215.Google Scholar
  32. Hjarvard, Stig. Forthcoming. Mediatization: Reframing the analysis of ‘media effects’. In The international encyclopedia of media effects, eds. Patrick Rössler, Cynthia A. Hoffner, and Liesbet van Zoonen. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. l’Etang, Jacquie. 2008. Public relations. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  34. Kjeldsen, Anna K. 2013. Strategic communication institutionalized: A Scandinavian perspective. Public Relations Inquiry 2 (2): 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klinger, Ulrike, and Jakob Svensson. 2015. The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media and Society 17 (8): 1241–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korthagen, Iris. 2015. Media logic versus the logic of network governance. Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  37. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, Sandra Lavenex, Marc Bühlmann, and Frank Esser. 2013. Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kunelius, Risto, and Esa Reunanen. 2011. Media in political power: A Parsonian view on the differentiated mediatization of Finnish decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (1): 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Landerer, Nino. 2013. Rethinking the logics: A conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics. Communication Theory 23 (3): 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Laursen, Bo, and Chiara Valentini. 2015. Mediatization and government communication: Press work in the European parliament. The International Journal of Press/Politics 20 (1): 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levay, Charlotta, and Caroline Waks. 2009. Professions and the pursuit of transparency in healthcare: Two cases of soft autonomy. Organization Studies 30 (5): 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindberg, Kajsa. 2014. Performing multiple logics in practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (4): 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lundby, Knut. 2009. Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Lundby, Knut. 2014. Handbooks of communication science: Mediatization of communication. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  46. Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 2016. Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture and Society 38 (3): 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marcinkowski, Frank, Matthias Kohring, Silke Fürst, and Andres Friedrichsmeier. 2014. Organizational influence on scientists’ efforts to go public: An empirical investigation. Science Communication 36 (1): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. 1987. Media logic and party logic in campaign coverage: The Italian general election of 1983. European Journal of Communication 2 (1): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz. 1999. Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mintzberg, Henry. 1983. Structures in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall International Editions.Google Scholar
  51. Morris, Tim, and Zoë Lancaster. 2006. Translating management ideas. Organization Studies 27 (2): 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mueller, Frank, and Andrea Whittle. 2011. Translating management ideas: A discursive devices analysis. Organization Studies 32 (2): 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pallas, Josef, and Magnus Fredriksson. 2013. Corporate media work and micro-dynamics of mediatization. European Journal of Communication 28 (4): 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pallas, Josef, Magnus Fredriksson, and Linda Wedlin. 2016. Translating institutional logics: When the media logic meets professions. Organisation Studies 37 (11): 1661–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pallas, Josef, Stefan Jonsson, and Lars Strannegård. 2014. Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Peleg, Anat, and Bryna Bogoch. 2014. Mediatization, legal logic and the coverage of Israeli politicians on trial. Journalism Practice 8 (3): 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pipan, Tatiana, and Barbara Czarniawska. 2010. How to construct an actor-network: Management accounting from idea to practice. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (3): 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Røvik, Kjell A. 2016. Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (3): 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin. 1996. Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In Translating organizational change, ed. Barbara Czarniawska, and Guje Sevón, 69–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar
  60. Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, and Lars Engwall. 2002. The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schillemans, Thomas. 2012. Mediatization of public services. How organizations adapt to news media. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  62. Schillemans, Thomas. 2016. Fighting or fumbling with the beast? The mediatisation of public sector agencies in Australia and the Netherlands. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scheu, Andreas M., Anna-Maria Volpers, Annika Summ, and Bernd Blöbaum. 2014. Medialization of research policy: Anticipation of and adaptation to journalistic logic. Science Communication 36 (6): 706–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schulz, Winfried. 2004. Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication 19 (1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scott, W.Richard. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Scott, W.Richard. 2003. Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4): 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sevón, Guje. 1996. Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Translating organizational change, ed. Barbara Czarniawska, and Guje Sevón, 49–68. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  68. Spyridonidis, Dimitrios, Graeme Currie, Stefan Heusinkveld, Karoline Strauss, and Andrew Sturdy. 2014. New developments in translation research. International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (2): 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strömbäck, Jesper. 2008. Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thorbjornsrud, Kjersti, Tine U. Figenschou, and Øyvind Ihlen. 2014. Mediatization in public bureaucracies: A typology. Communications—The European Journal of Communication Research 39 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
  71. Thornton, Patricia, and William Ocasio. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thornton, Patricia, William Ocasio, and Michael Lounsbury. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tyllström, Anna. 2013. Legitimacy for sale: Constructing a market for PR consultancy. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala University, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  74. van Aelst, Peter, Bart Maddens, Jo Noppe, and Stefaan Fiers. 2008. Politicians in the news: Media or party logic? Media attention and electoral success in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication 23 (2): 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Waldorff, Susanne B. 2013. Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management 29 (3): 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wedlin, Linda, and Kerstin Sahlin. 2017. Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, ed. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin, 218–242. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Werr, Andreas, and Torbjörn Stjernberg. 2003. Exploring management consulting firms as knowledge systems. Organization Studies 24 (6): 881–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zeh, Reimar, and David N. Hopmann. 2013. Indicating mediatization? Two decades of election campaign television coverage. European Journal of Communication 28 (3): 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations