Towards the “Audiencization” of Mediatization Research? Audience Dynamics as Co-Constitutive of Mediatization Processes
Looking over the landscape of recent debates about mediatization, this chapter opens up a discussion of the theoretical and methodological challenges arising from the need to systematically explore audience dynamics as an integral part of mediatization processes. The chapter directs its argument towards institutionalist mediatization theory as well as constructivist mediatization theory. The theoretical argument is supported by empirical examples taken from the areas of audiences’ news platform selection and repertoire-building; online audience mobilization; and media and audience discourses about politics. It is finally suggested that Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding model can be used as a heuristic framework for conceptualizing the ‘audiencization’ of mediatization processes.
KeywordsMediatization Research newsNews Media audienceAudience Hjarvard repertoireRepertoire
I am grateful for the suggestions of the anonymous reviewer of this text and for my discussions with colleagues in the research group “Audience and mediated life” at Roskilde University: Jannie Møller Hartley, Fabian Holt, Anne Mølle Lindelof, David Mathieu, Susana Tosca and Norbert Wildermuth. Also, thanks to Knut Lundby for encouragement along the way.
- Brants, Kees. 2014. Beyond media logic. Keynote address for the ECREA conference, Lisbon, 12–15 November 2014.Google Scholar
- Couldry. 2014. Mediatization: What is it? In Media practice and everyday agency in Europe, ed. Leif Kramp, Nico Carpentier, Andreas Hepp, Ilija Tomanić Trivundža, Hannu Nieminen, Risto Kunelius, Tobias Olsson, Ebba Sundin, and Richard Kilborn, 33–39. Bremen: Edition Lumière.Google Scholar
- Couldry, Nick, Sonia Livingstone, and Tim Markham. 2007. Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Encheva, Kameliy, Olivier Driessens, and Hans Verstraeten. 2013. The mediatization of deviant subcultures: An analysis of the media-related practices of graffiti writers and skaters. Mediekultur 54: 8–25.Google Scholar
- Gamson, William. 1992. Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Haddon, Leslie. 2016. The domestication of complex media repertoires. In The media and the mundane: Communication across media in everyday life, ed. Kjetil Sandvik, Anne Mette Thorhauge, and Bjarki Valtysson, 17–30. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
- Hall, Stuart. 1973. Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Stencilled occasional paper, Media Series No. 7, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham. Abridged version. In Culture, media, language, eds. Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis (1980), 128–138. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, Maren. 2009. Everyday: Domestication of mediatization or mediatized domestication? In Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences, ed. Knut Lundby, 225–242. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Hasebrink, Uwe, and Andreas Hepp. 2016. How to research cross-media practices? Investigating media repertoires and media ensembles. Working Paper no. 15, Communicative Figurations series, University of Bremen. http://www.kommunikative-figurationen.de/fileadmin/redak_kofi/Arbeitspapiere/CoFi_EWP_No-15_Hasebrink_Hepp.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.
- Hepp, Andreas. 2013. Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Hepp, Andreas. 2014. Communicative figurations. In Media practice and everyday agency in Europe, eds. Leif Kramp, Nico Carpentier, Andreas Hepp, Ilija Tomanić Trivundža, Hannu Nieminen, Risto Kunelius, Tobias Olsson, Ebba Sundin, and Richard Kilborn, 83–99. Bremen: Edition Lumière.Google Scholar
- Hjarvard, Stig. 2013. The mediatization of culture and society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hjarvard, Stig. 2016a. Mediatization. In The international encyclopedia of media effects, eds. Patrick Rössler, Cynthia A. Hoffner, and Liesbet van Zoonen, 1–20. Malden MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hjarvard, Stig. 2016b. Medialisering: Teori og historie. In Medialisering. Mediernes rolle i social og kulturel forandring, ed. Stig Hjarvard, 17–38. København: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
- Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Kobbernagel, Christian, and Kim C. Schrøder. 2016. From everyday communicative figurations to rigorous audience news repertoires: A mixed method approach to cross-media news consumption. Mediekultur 32(60): 6–31.Google Scholar
- Krotz, Friedrich. 2014. From a social worlds perspective to the analysis of mediatized worlds. In Media practice and everyday agency in Europe, ed. Leif Kramp, Nico Carpentier, Andreas Hepp, Ilija Tomanić Trivundža, Hannu Nieminen, Risto Kunelius, Tobias Olsson, Ebba Sundin, and Richard Kilborn, 69–82. Bremen: Edition Lumière.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, Sonia. 2005. On the relation between audiences and publics. In Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere, ed. Sonia Livingstone, 17–41. Bristol UK: Intellect.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, Sonia, and Peter Lunt. 2014. Mediatization: An emerging paradigm for media and communication research? In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 703–723. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
- Lundby, Knut. 2014a. Engaging with conflicts in mediatized religious environments. Paper for the Norwegian Association for Media Research, Trondheim 23–24 October 2014.Google Scholar
- Lundby, Knut. 2014b. Mediatization of communication. In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 3–35. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
- Lundby, Knut. 2016. Where are audiences in mediatization research? Paper for the Mediatization section of the 6th ECREA conference, Prague 9–12 November 2016.Google Scholar
- Madianou, Mirca. 2014. Polymedia: Communication and mediatized migration: An ethnographic approach. In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 323–346. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter/Mouton.Google Scholar
- Moe, Hallvard, and Hilde Van Den Bulck. 2016. Teletext in Europe. From the analog to the digital era. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
- Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. 1996. Discourse analysis. In Rethinking methods in psychology, ed. Jonothan A. Smith, Rom Harré, and Luk Van Langenhove, 80–92. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Reuters Digital News Report. Published annually. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed 22 Apr 2017.
- Rosen, Jay. 2006. The people formerly known as the audience, PressThink. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html.
- Schrøder. Kim C., and Ib T. Gulbrandsen. In press. Audience. In The international encyclopedia of strategic communication, ed. Robert L. Heath, and Winni Johansen. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Thorlacius, Lisbeth. 2016. Visuel remediering af de danske netaviser. In Den fælles dagsorden—Og alle de andre, ed. Mark Blach-Ørsten, and Ida Willig, 105–130. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
- Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Webster, F. 2014. The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar