Advertisement

The Complexities of Mediatization: Charting the Road Ahead

  • Göran Bolin
  • Andreas Hepp
Chapter
Part of the Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research book series (TCSCMR)

Abstract

This chapter discusses some of the complexities of mediatization that have appeared in the volume. Firstly, we reflect on the complexities related to the institutional, cultural and social dimensions of mediatization as well as the various levels of mediatization (e.g., with reference to a macro-micro scale). Secondly, on this basis, we systematize the main features that run through the complex nature of the mediatization process, and we account for three kinds of complexity: the complexity of the media environment or landscape, the complexity of an entanglement of practices with digital media technologies, and the complexity of the levels of analysis. Reflecting these complexities, in a third section, the chapter delineates some future trajectories of mediatization research.

References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, Richard Münch, and Neil J. Smelser. 1987. The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, Jean. 1971. Requiem pour les media. Utopie 4: 35–51.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, David. 2016. Metric power. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Walter. 1977 [1936]. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Mass Communication and Society, ed. James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, and Janet Woollacott, 384–408. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  5. Bolin, Göran. 2006. Electronic geographies: Media landscapes as technological and symbolic environments. In Geographies of communication. The spatial turn in media studies, ed. Jesper Falkheimer, and André Jansson, 67–86. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  6. Bolin, Göran. 2009. Symbolic production and value in media industries. Journal of Cultural Economy 2 (3): 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolin, Göran. 2011. Value and the media. Cultural production and consumption in digital markets. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Bolin, Göran. 2014. Institution, technology, world: Relationships between the media, culture and society. In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 175–197. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. Bolin, Göran, and Jonas A. Schwarz. 2015. Heuristics of the algorithm. Big data, user interpretation and institutional translation. Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Bolter, Jay D., and Richard Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boyd, Danah. 2010. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, ed. Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  14. Couldry, Nick. 2004. Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics 14 (2): 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Couldry, Nick. 2012. Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2013. Conceptualising mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2017. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Curran, James. 2000. Introduction. In Media organisations in society, ed. James Curran, 9–16. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  19. Deacon, David, and James Stanyer. 2014. Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture and Society 36 (7): 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekström, Mats, Johan Fornäs, André Jansson, and Anne Jerslev. 2016. Three tasks for mediatization research: Contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture and Society 38 (7): 1090–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis, John. 2000. Scheduling: The last creative act in television? Media, Culture and Society 22 (1): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ezzamel, Mahmoud, and Hugh Willmott. 2014. Registering ‘the ethical’ in organization theory formation: Towards the disclosure of an ‘invisible force’. Organization Studies 35 (7): 1013–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gumbrecht, Hans U., and K. Ludwig Pfeiffer. 1994. Materialities of communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.Google Scholar
  24. Hasebrink, Uwe, and Sascha Hölig. 2014. Topografie der Öffentlichkeit. APuZ 22–23: 16–22.Google Scholar
  25. Hasebrink, Uwe, Klaus B. Jensen, Hilde van den Bulck, Sascha Hölig, and Pieter Maeseele. 2015. Changing patterns of media use across cultures: A challenge for longitudinal research. International Journal of Communication 9: 23.Google Scholar
  26. Hepp, Andreas. 2013. Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hepp, Andreas, and Friedrich Krotz. 2014. Mediatized worlds: Understanding everyday mediatization. In Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age, ed. Andreas Hepp, and Friedrich Krotz, 1–15. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hepp, Andreas, and Communicative Figurations Research Network. 2017. Transforming communications. Media-related changes in times of deep mediatization. Communicative figurations working paper 16. Bremen: Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
  29. Hepp, Andreas, Stig Hjarvard, and Knut Lundby. 2015. Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture and Society 37 (2): 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hjarvard, Stig. 2013. The mediatization of culture and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Hopkins, Julian. 2015. Assembling blog affordances: Theorising affordances and agency in new media. EASA Media Anthropology Network’s 51st e-seminar. http://www.media-anthropology.net/file/hopkins_assembling_affordances(2).pdf. Accessed 11 May 2017.
  32. Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35 (2): 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jansson, André, and Johan Lindell. 2014. News media consumption in the transmedia age: Amalgamations, orientations and geo-social structuration. Journalism Studies 16 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen, Klaus B., and Rasmus Helles. 2015. Audiences across media. A comparative agenda for future research on media audiences. International Journal of Communication 9: 291–298.Google Scholar
  35. Krotz, Friedrich. 2007. The meta-process of mediatization as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication 3 (3): 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunelius, Risto, and Esa Reunanen. 2016. Changing power of journalism: The two phases of mediatization. Communication Theory 26: 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Livingstone, Sonia M. 2001. Children and their changing media environment. In Children and their changing media environment. A European comparative study, ed. Sonia M. Livingstone, and Moira Bovill, 307–333. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Loosen, Wiebke, and Armin Scholl. 2017. Die Komplexität der Komplexitätsforschung. Theoretische Herkunft und Anwendung in der Journalismusforschung. Paper presented at the annual conference of the DGPuK-Fachgruppe Journalistik/Journalismusforschung, February 16 2017, in Würzburg.Google Scholar
  40. Lundby, Knut. 2014. Mediatization of communication. In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 3–35. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  41. Lunt, Peter, and Sonia M. Livingstone. 2016. Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Harvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture and Society 38 (3): 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller. 2013. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16 (6): 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mager, Astrid. 2012. Algorithmic ideology. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 769–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  45. Manson, Steven M. 2001. Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32 (3): 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martín-Barbero, Jesús. 1993. Communication, culture, and hegemony: From the media to mediations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Morley, David. 1992. Television audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Qvortrup, Lars. 2006. Understanding new digital media medium theory or complexity theory. European Journal of Communication 21 (3): 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schäfer, Mirko T., and Karin van Es. 2017. The datafied society. Studying culture through data.. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 10–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Schrock, Andrew R. 2015. Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication 9: 1229–1246.Google Scholar
  53. Schrøder, Kim C. 2011. Audiences are inherently cross-media: Audience studies and the cross-media challenge. Communication Management Quarterly 18 (6): 5–27.Google Scholar
  54. Silverstone, Roger. 2005. The sociology of mediation and communication. In Sage handbook of sociology, ed. Craig Calhoun, Chris Rojek, and Bruce Turner, 188–207. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson, John B. 1995. The media and modernity. A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Turow, Joseph. 2006. Niche envy. Marketing discrimination in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Turow, Joseph. 2011. The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven: Yale UP.Google Scholar
  58. van Dijck, José. 2014. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208.Google Scholar
  59. Walby, Sylvia. 2007. Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4): 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Södertörn UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations