Advertisement

Introduction: Situating Dynamics of Mediatization

  • Olivier Driessens
  • Stig Hjarvard
Chapter
Part of the Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research book series (TCSCMR)

Abstract

In the introduction to this volume, we set out why it is important to focus on dynamics of mediatization and how this contributes to the study of media-related social change. We stress that to fully understand dynamics of change, mediatization should be studied in interrelation with other meta-processes, such as commercialization or politicization. Furthermore, also the contexts of change need to be taken seriously, in terms of field(s) of analysis, space and geography, as well as in terms of time, thereby avoiding so-called epochalist thinking.

References

  1. Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie. 2014. Understanding mediatization in “First modernity”: Sociological classics and their perspectives on mediated and mediatized societies. In Mediatization of communication: Handbook of communication science, ed. Knut Lundby, 109–130. Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  2. Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2013. Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Couldry, Nick, and Andreas Hepp. 2017. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, David, and James Stanyer. 2014. Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture and Society 36 (7): 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Driessens, Olivier, Karin Raeymaeckers, Hans Verstraeten, and Sarah Vandenbussche. 2010. Personalization according to politicians: A practice theoretical analysis of mediatization. Communications 35 (3): 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekström, Mats, Johan Fornäs, André Jansson, and Anne Jerslev. 2016. Three tasks for mediatization research: Contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture and Society 38 (7): 1090–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finnemann, Niels O. 2011. Mediatization theory and digital media. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 36 (1): 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hjarvard, Stig. 2016. Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture and Society 38 (1): 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knoblauch, Hubert. 2014. Benedict in Berlin: The mediatization of religion. In Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age, ed. Andreas Hepp, and Friedrich Krotz, 143–158. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lövheim, Mia. 2011. Mediatisation of religion: A critical appraisal. Culture and Religion 12 (2): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lundby, Knut. 2014. Mediatization of communication. In Mediatization of communication, ed. Knut Lundby, 3–35. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 2016. Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture and Society 38 (3): 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Savage, Mike. 2009. Against epochalism: An analysis of conceptions of change in British sociology. Cultural Sociology 3 (2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schulz, Winfried. 2004. Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication 19 (1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Witschge, Tamara. 2014. Passive accomplice or active disruptor: The role of audiences in the mediatization of politics. Journalism Practice 8 (3): 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations