Skip to main content

Disability Identification: The Naming Is Explaining Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Medicalization of America's Schools
  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter examines the medical model the paradigm education uses to designate children educationally disabled. Contending that the disability designation is both faulty and counterproductive, the chapter counters with a brief look at the effect Sputnik had on American education, proposing that children’s achievement struggles, though quite real, derive from a systemic error germane to general education. While the disability debate continued, the numbers of schoolchildren declared educationally disabled increased dramatically across the USA. Their numbers soon caused financial havoc for school districts and state budgets. Questions were raised regarding special education’s ability to diagnose the supposed educational disabilities, thereby highlighting the disturbing issue of false positive identifications. An interchange between practicing school psychologists, professionals often responsible for declaring a child learning-disabled, suggests that special education’s diagnostic procedure suffers serious problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith, R.M. & Neisworth, J.T. (1975). The exceptional child: A functional approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  2. 2.

    Barsch, R.H. (1968). Perspectives on learning disabilities: The vectors of a new convergence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 7–23.

  3. 3.

    See Spitzer, Robert L., M.D., Williams, Janet B.W., D.S.W., First, Michael B., M.D., Gibbon, Miriam, M.S.W., Biometric Research; Maser, J.D. & Akiskal, H.S. et al. (2002) Spectrum concepts in major mental disorders Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 25, Special issue 4; Krueger, R.F.; Watson, D.; Barlow, D.H. et al. (2005). “Introduction to the Special Section: Toward a Dimensionally Based Taxonomy of Psychopathology”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 114 (4): 491–493. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.491. PMC 2242426. PMID 16351372; Bentall, R. (2006). “Madness explained: Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a ‘complaint-orientated’ approach to understanding mental illness.” Medical Hypotheses 66 (2): 220–233. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.026. PMID 16300903.

  4. 4.

    Myers, P.I. & Hammill, D.D. (1990). Learning disabilities: Basic concepts, assessment practices, and instructional strategies (3rd ed.) (p. 13). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

  5. 5.

    Reynolds, C.R. (1990). Conceptual and technical problems in learning disability diagnosis. In C.R. Reynolds & R.W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (p. 574). New York: Guilford.

  6. 6.

    Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M.L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (p. 350). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

  7. 7.

    Personal Communication: Memo from Executive Director of Special Education and Pupil Services to School Psychologists (1992), Tucson, AZ.

  8. 8.

    Hinshaw, S.P. & Scheffler, R.M. (2014). The ADHD explosion: Myths, medication, money, and today’s push for performance(p. 18). New York: Oxford Press.

  9. 9.

    Wakefield, J.C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder. On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47, (3), 373–388.

  10. 10.

    Kusinitz, M. (2017). Germ theory. Net Industries. Retrieved from http://science.jrank.org/pages/3035/Germ-Theory.html.

  11. 11.

    Gayathri, A. (2012). US 17th in global education ranking; Finland, South Korea claim top spots. International Business Times. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/us-17th-global-education-ranking-finland-south-korea-claim-top-spots-901538.

  12. 12.

    Rice, M. (2014). Ranking America: a site for information about the U.S. Retrieved from https://rankingamerica.wordpress.com/category/education/.

  13. 13.

    Clowse, B.B. (1981). Brainpower for the cold war: The sputnik crisis and national defense education act of 1958 (p. 28). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  14. 14.

    Garber, S. (2007, October 10). Sputnik and the dawn of the space age. NASA History Web. Retrieved from https://history.nasa.gov/sputnik. See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_1.

  15. 15.

    The federal role in education. (2017). Department of education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/role.html.

  16. 16.

    Clowse, B.B. (p. 21). (See also: A birthday flexing of red biceps. (1957, November 18.) Life, p. 35, and Building brainpower. (1957, November 4). Newsweek, p. 96).

  17. 17.

    Jackson, H. (1957, October 6). Blow to U.S. seen. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1957/10/06/archives/blow-to-us-seen-jackson-says-soviet-satellite-hurts-nations.html.

  18. 18.

    Clowse, B.B. (1981). p. 106. See also Wilson, S. (1958, March 24). It’s time to close the carnival. Life, 37.

  19. 19.

    Sleeter, C.E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–64.

  20. 20.

    Sleeter, C.E. (1986), p. 46.

  21. 21.

    Sleeter, C.E. (1986), pp. 46–64.

  22. 22.

    96-07-09 PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL_ASSESS.

  23. 23.

    Tue, July 9, 1996-0400 PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL_ASSESS.

  24. 24.

    Tue, July 9, 1996-0600 PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL_ASSESS.

  25. 25.

    Fri, November 17, 1995-0500 ASSESS-P.

  26. 26.

    Mon, November 9, 1995 ASSESS-P.

  27. 27.

    Fri, November 17, 1995 ASSESS-P.

  28. 28.

    Wed, November 15, 1995-0700 ASSESS-P.

  29. 29.

    Tue, July 9, 1996 PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL_ASSESS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Macht, J. (2017). Disability Identification: The Naming Is Explaining Game. In: The Medicalization of America's Schools. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62974-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics