Advertisement

Customary Law, General Principles, Unilateral Acts

  • Malgosia FitzmauriceEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This contribution deals in particular with an undisputed and fundamental contribution of Nicaragua cases to the development of customary international law. The question of customary international law in the Nicaragua cases has become a central issue in the whole debate on this source of international law. The approach of the Court to the two-element structure of customary international law, has been a source of an invigorating scholarly discussion and speculation. To some extent the author of this contribution also engages into the debate how customary international law has developed further through judicial practice, in particular that of the International Court of Justice, not lacking in controversy. This contribution deals with general principles of law, focusing on the principle of res judicata. Finally, it deals with unilateral acts, focusing on the legal character of optional declaration within the system of compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, reliance on which in the Nicaragua v. United States case was met with a very robust debate.

References

  1. Benivisti E (2004) Customary international law as a judicial tool for promoting efficiency. In: Kirsch M (ed) The impact of international law international cooperation. CUP, Cambridge, pp 85–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordin FL (2014) Reflections of customary international law: the authority of codification conventions and ILC draft articles on international law. ICLQ 63:535–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charlesworth H (1984–1987) Customary international law and the Nicaragua case. AYbIL 11:2–32Google Scholar
  4. Charlesworth H (1998) The unbearable lightness of customary international law. ASIL Proc 92:44–47Google Scholar
  5. Charney JL (1988) Customary international law in the Nicaragua case. Judgment on merits. Hague YbIL 18:16–29Google Scholar
  6. Crawford JR (2012) Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua case (Nicaragua v United States of America). In: Woflrum R (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law, vol VII. OUP, Oxford, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  7. Czaplinski W (1989) Sources of international law in the Nicaragua case. ICLQ 38:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Amato A (1985) Nicaragua and international law: the “Academic” and the “Real”. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=facultyworkingpapers. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  9. D’Amato A (1987) Trashing customary international law. AJIL 81:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennings R (1982) The identification of international law. In: Cheng B (ed) International law: teaching and practice. Stevens, London, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  11. Kassoti E (2015) The juridical nature of unlateral acts of states in international law. Brill/Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirgis F (1987) Custom on a sliding scale. AJIL 81:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolb R (2003) Selected problems in the theory of customary international law. NILR 50:119–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lang C (1990) L’affaire Nicaragua/États-Unis devant la Cour internationale de Justice. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Lepard B (2010) Customary international law: a new theory with practical applications. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendelson M (1989) The Nicaragua case and customary international law. Coexistence 26:85–99Google Scholar
  17. Meron T (1998) War crimes law comes of age. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Pax TJ (1985) Nicaragua v. United States in the International Court of Justice: compulsory jurisdiction of just compulsion? Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev 8:471–515Google Scholar
  19. Roberts A (2001) Traditional and modern approaches to customary international law: a reconciliation. AJIL 95:757–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saganek P (2015) Unilateral acts of states in public international law. Brill/Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schlütter B (2010) Developments in customary international law. Theory and practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia. Martinus Njihoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. Sender O, Wood M (2015) The international court of justice and customary international law: a reply to Stefan Talmon. EJIL: Talk!. http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-court-of-justice-and-customary-international-law-a-reply-to-stefan-talmon/. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  23. Skubiszewski K (1971) Elements of custom and the Hague Court. ZaöRV 31:810–854Google Scholar
  24. Talmon S (2015a) Determining customary international law: the ICJ’s methodology between induction, deduction and assertion. EJIL 26:417–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Talmon S (2015b) Determining customary international law: the ICJ’s methodology and the idyllic world of the ILC. EJIL: Talk!. http://www.ejiltalk.org/determining-customary-international-law-the-icjs-methodology-and-the-idyllic-world-of-the-ilc/#more-13882. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  26. Tasioulas J (1996) In defence of relative normativity: communitarian values and the Nicaragua case. Oxf J Leg Stud 16:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomka P (2013) The judge and international custom. LPICT 12:195–216Google Scholar
  28. Tomuschat C (1999) International law: ensuring the survival of mankind on the eve of the new century: general course of international law. Collect Course Hague Acad Int Law 281:9–438Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawQueen Mary, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations