Studying Population Genetics and Belonging



The chapter opens with the research questions that the book sets out to answer. The chapter describes the book’s approach, which draws on science and technology studies and cultural studies. The chapter describes the book’s methodological contribution and introduces its argument. It also discusses key concepts, including narrative, cultural imaginaries, belonging, intersectionality, and affect.


Population Genetic Research Genetic Ancestry Testing Biotechnological Practices TallBear Human Genome Diversity Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anthias, Floya. 2009. Thinking through the Lens of Translocational Positionality: An Intersectionality Frame for Understanding Identity and Belonging. Translocations: Migration and Social Change 1 (4): 5–20.Google Scholar
  3. Antonsich, Marco. 2010. Searching for Belonging—An Analytical Framework. Geography Compass 4 (6): 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, Ann-Dorte. 2009. Belonging and Unbelonging from an Intersectional Perspective. Gender, Technology and Development 13 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fortier, Anne-Marie. 2000. Migrant Belongings: Memory, Space, Identity. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  6. Franklin, Sarah. 2007. Dolly Mixtures: The Making of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fujimura, Joan H., Ramya Rajagopalan, Pilar N. Ossorio, and Kjell A. Doksum. 2010. Race and Ancestry: Operationalizing Populations in Human Genetic Variation Studies. In What’s the Use of Race? Modern Governance and the Biology of Difference, ed. Ian Whitmarsh and David S. Jones, 169–183. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gieryn, Thomas. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinterberger, Amy. 2012. Investing in Life, Investing in Difference: Nations, Populations and Genomes. Theory, Culture and Society 29 (3): 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2): 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———, eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Koenig, Barbara A., Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, and Sarah S. Richardson, eds. 2008. Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lähdesmäki, Tuuli, Tuija Saresma, Kaisa Hiltunen, Saara Jäntti, Nina Sääskilahti, Antti Vallius, and Kaisa Ahvenjärvi. 2016. Fluidity and Flexibility of ‘Belonging’: Uses of the Concept in Contemporary Research. Acta Sociologica 59 (3): 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. M’charek, Amade. 2005. The Human Genome Diversity Project: An Ethnography of Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. Fragile Differences, Relational Effects: Stories about the Materiality of Race and Sex. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. M’charek, Amade, Katharina Schramm, and David Skinner. 2014. Topologies of Race: Doing Territory, Population and Identity in Europe. Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (4): 468–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nash, Catherine. 2015. Genetic Geographies: The Trouble with Ancestry. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Oikkonen, Venla. 2013. Gender, Sexuality and Reproduction in Evolutionary Narratives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2015. The Politics of Becoming Different: Rethinking Evolution through Population Genetics. Feminist Theory 6 (2): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reardon, Jenny. 2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Roof, Judith. 1996. Come as You Are: Sexuality and Narrative. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, Nikolas. 2008. Race, Risk and Medicine in the Age of ‘Your Own Personal Genome’. BioSocieties 3: 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schiebinger, Londa. [1993] 2004. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smart, Andrew, Deborah A. Bolnick, and Richard Tutton. 2017. Health and Genetic Ancestry Testing: Time to Bridge the Gap. BMC Medical Genomics 10 (3). doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0240-3.
  28. Sommer, Marianne. 2016. History Within: The Science, Culture, and Politics of Bones, Organisms, and Molecules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wailoo, Keith, Alondra Nelson, and Catherine Lee, eds. 2012. Genetics and the Unsettled Past: The Collision of DNA, Race, and History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wald, Priscilla. 2000. Future Perfect: Grammar, Genes, and Geography. New Literary History 31 (4): 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2006. Blood and Stories: How Genomics Is Rewriting Race, Medicine and Human History. Patterns of Prejudice 40 (4–5): 304–333.Google Scholar
  33. Whitmarsh, Ian, and David S. Jones, eds. 2010. What’s the Use of Race? Modern Governance and the Biology of Difference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Helsinki Collegium for Advanced StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations