The Effect of the Programming Interfaces of Robots in Teaching Computer Languages

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 630)


Programming is a popular subject in education and experts emphasize the importance of teaching programming to the children in the high school or even earlier. In this study, we used robots for teaching programming basics to the high school and college students and observed the effects of different interfaces. We used an educational robot called Thymio-II with Aseba Event Script Language (AESL), which is designed specifically for the Thymio. In this work, our hypothesis is that visual programming interfaces are more successful on learning programming and facilitate the learning with other interfaces and languages. In order to teach programming, as well as the interfaces and the robot features, we created a curriculum applicable to all interfaces. We taught students ages ranging from 15 to 24 using lecture content prepared in the form of video recordings. Students were given 30 min of lectures and at the end of each lecture students were expected to write a program according to predefined requirements. Students were divided to groups using different interfaces and we observed the difference of the learning curves of students for each programming interface. In our tests, we used original English AESL, Turkish version of AESL and a graphical interface called Visual Programming Language (VPL). We compared the performance of the students using the graphical icon based against the classical text based programming languages.


Teaching computer languages Visual programming Robots in teaching programming Programming interfaces 



We would like to thank all the people who participate in this study and our team members Ihsan Halici and M. Adem Celebi for their efforts in teaching and test assessments.


  1. 1.
    Feurzeig, W.: Programming-Languages as a Conceptual Framework for Teaching Mathematics. Final Report on the First Fifteen Months of the LOGO Project (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clements, D.H., Gullo, D.F.: Effects of computer programming on young children’s cognition. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(6), 1051–1058 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pea, R.D., Kurland, D.M.: On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas Psychol. 2(2), 137–168 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dalbey, J., Linn, M.C.: The demands and requirements of computer programming: a literature review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 1(3), 253–274 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W.M.G., Zwnaeveld, B.: Teaching programming in secondary school: a pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Inf. Educ. 10(1), 73–88 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winslow, L.E.: Programming pedagogy - a psychological over-view. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 28(3), 17–22 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Computing our future Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  8. 8.
    Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J., Paterson, J.: A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39(4), 204 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duke, R., Salzman, E., Burmeister, J., Poon, J., Murray, L.: Teaching programming to beginners - choosing the language is just the first step. In: ACE 2000, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 79–86 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kölling, M., Rosenberg, J.: Blue - a language for teaching object-oriented programming. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 28(1), 190–194 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brilliant, S.S., Wiseman, T.R.: The first programming paradigm and language dilemma. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 28(1), 338–342 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-A’Ali, M., Hamid, M.: Design of an arabic programming language (ARABLAN). Comput. Lang. 21(3–4), 191–201 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Annamalai, M.: Ezhil: a tamil programming language. eprint arXiv:0907.4960 (2009)
  14. 14.
    Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., Eastmond, E.: The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 1–15 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doolittle, P.E., Camp, W.G.: Constructivism: the career and technical education perspective. J. Vocat. Techn. Educ. 16(1) (1999). Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  16. 16.
    Bers, M.U., Ponte, I., Juelich, C., Viera, A., Schenker, J.: Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Inf. Technol. Child. Educ. Annu. 2002(1), 123–145 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riedo, F., Chevalier, M., Magnenat, S., Mondada, F.: Thymio II, a robot that grows wiser with children. In: 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Specifications - Thymio & Aseba. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  19. 19.
    Magnenat, S., Rettornaz, P., Bonani, M., Longchamp, V., Mondada, F.: ASEBA: a modular architecture for event-based control of complex robots. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16(2), 321–329 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shin, J., Siegwart, R., Magnenat, S.: Visual programming language for Thymio II robot. In: Interaction Design and Children (IDC) (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magnenat, S., Longchamp, V., Mondada, F.: Aseba, an event-based middleware for distributed robot control. In: IEEE-RSJ 2007 International Conference on Intelligent Robotsand Systems, Workshops and Tutorials CD (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Overview & Download - Thymio & Aseba. Accessed 30 Mar 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer and Informatics EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations