Abstract
To embark on the making of a feature film is sheer madness. Yet some of us cannot help but be driven to engage with this form by adopting creative and managerial methods, routines, processes and discourses that help us navigate our way towards creating some kind of impact. In this chapter, I seek to describe and articulate an example of a film project as research, with a particular emphasis on looking at how documentation and critical reflection form the core methodology of the project. In the madness that is filmmaking, how can methodology and method be employed to provide the basis for rigour in the research enquiry?
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
As an assistant filmmaker, Mark Duggan was involved in all aspects of the ‘total filmmaking’ process, right from the screenplay stage through to the final screening—in particular the development process, the cinematography, the editing and the postproduction sound (see Knudsen 2016).
- 3.
See Knudsen (2016).
- 4.
See vlog 5 and vlog 17 at www.theravenonthejetty.com.
- 5.
See Reed-Danahay (1997).
- 6.
Writing a statement this short requires much scrutiny and my first draft here is just that: a first example draft based on REF 2014 guidelines. The Raven on the Jetty was first released in 2015 and was therefore not submitted for REF 2014; this is therefore not an actual submitted statement. The project will be eligible for a future REF 2020 exercise.
- 7.
While Christian church going may have collapsed in the UK, still in 2015, 52% of the British population believed in God or a spiritual greater power (https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/02/12/third-british-adults-dont-believe-higher-power/), despite the UK being ranked as one of the least-believing nations (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/12/uk-one-of-worlds-least-religious-countries-survey-finds). In 2011 more than 90% of Americans believed in God (http://www.gallup.com/poll/147887/americans-continue-believe-god.aspx).
- 8.
See The Courage to Doubt (Davidson 1983).
- 9.
Photography is an increasingly important part of my practice.
- 10.
I am working with a book designer and a book maker and their contributions add other dimensions to the project.
References
Adams, J. (2013). Presenting the Evidence: The REF Output Statement and Portfolio. Journal of Media Practice, 14(4), 279–289.
Bresson, R. (1967). Mouchette [Film]. France.
Ceylan, N. B. (1998). Kasaba [Film]. Turkey.
Davidson, R. (1983). The Courage to Doubt. London: SCM Press.
Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/147887/americans-continue-believe-god.aspx. Accessed 30 Aug 2016.
Guardian Online. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/12/uk-one-of-worlds-least-religious-countries-survey-finds. Accessed 30 Aug 2016.
HEFCE. (2016). Evaluation of REF 2014. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/REFreview/. Accessed 14 Nov 2016.
Knudsen, E. (1991). One Day Tafo [Film]. UK.
Knudsen, E. (2010). Zen and the Art of Film Narrative. Journal of Screenwriting, 1(2), 343–355.
Knudsen, E. (2015a). Eyes and Narrative Perspectives on Story: A Practice Led Exploration of the Use of Eyes and Eye Lines in Fiction Film. Journal of Media Practice, 15(1), 3–20.
Knudsen, E. (2015b). The Raven on the Jetty [Film]. UK.
Knudsen, E. (2015c). The Raven on the Jetty [Production Scrapbook and DVD of the Film]. Todmorden: One Day Films.
Knudsen, E. (2016). The Total Filmmaker: Thinking of Screenwriting, Directing and Editing as One Role. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 13(1), 109–129.
Knudsen, E. (2017). Doubt [Film]. UK.
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 40, 112–132.
Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as Research in the Arts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
One Day Films. onedayfilms.com. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.
Rouch, J., & Morin, E. (1961). Chronicle of a Summer [Film]. France.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Stein, G. (1992). Sacred Emily in Geography of Plays. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
The Raven on the Jetty. theravenonthejetty.com. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
REF. (2014). Research Excellence Framework 2014 Overview Report by Main Panel D and Sub-Panels 27 to 36. REF 2014 was Conducted Jointly by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) and the Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland (DEL), http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/expanel/member/Main%20Panel%20D%20overview%20report.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
YouGovUK. https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/02/12/third-british-adults-dont-believe-higher-power/. Accessed 30 Aug 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knudsen, E. (2018). Method in Madness: A Case Study in Practice Research Methods. In: Batty, C., Kerrigan, S. (eds) Screen Production Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62837-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62837-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62836-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62837-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)