Skip to main content

Using Practitioner-Based Enquiry (PBE) to Examine Screen Production as a Form of Creative Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Screen Production Research

Abstract

In order to understand creative practice, one firstly needs to understand the current research literature into creativity. We then have a basis for examining ways of researching creativity, particularly in relation to screen production. There are a number of possible research approaches. Using a framework that is common to all research, be it objectivist, subjectivist or constructionist, one could research screen production by taking a traditional research approach such as textual analysis or ethnography or by, instead, undertaking a creative practice research process while producing audio-visual material for the screen using a practitioner-based enquiry (PBE) approach. This chapter outlines the ontological and epistemological basis of PBE, describes and justifies its general use as a research tool to examine the creative process, outlines how it is used to research screen production as a specific form of creative practice, and finally, provides empirical examples of its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, V. (2003). Sociology of the Arts: Exploring Fine and Popular Forms. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, S. (1988). Achieving Extraordinary Ends: An Essay on Creativity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bastick, T. (1982). Intuition: How We Think and Act. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1982). Art Worlds. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Field of Cultural Production, (R. Johnson, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (2003). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, Culture and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 325–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2004). The Foundations of Research. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guildford, J. (1970). Creativity: Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 4(3), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havens, T., & Lotz, A. (2016). Understanding Media Industries (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, B., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J., & Sternberg, R. (Eds). (2006). The International Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2013). Accommodating Creative Documentary Practice within a Revised Systems Model of Creativity. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing Creative Documentary Practices. In P. McIntyre, J. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds), The Creative System in Action: Understanding Cultural Production and Practice (pp. 125–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2008). Creativity and Cultural Production: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding Creativity Through an Ethnographic Study of Songwriting. Cultural Science, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2009). Rethinking Communication, Creativity and Cultural Production: Outlining Issues for Media Practice. In T. Flew (Ed.), Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship: Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Annual Conference, Brisbane, July 8–10. ISBN 987-1-74107-275-4. Available at: http://www.proceedings.anzca09.org.

  • McIntyre, P. (2012). Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., & Paton, E. (Eds). (2016). The Creative System in Action: Understanding Cultural Production and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, L., & Lawrence, B. (2000). Practitioner-Based Enquiry: Principles for Postgraduate Research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. (2006). The Philosophical Roots of Western and Eastern Conceptions of Creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E., & Kaufman, S. (Eds). (2014). The Philosophy of Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P., & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1982). Five Constraints on the Production of Culture: Law, Technology, Market, Organizational Structure and Occupational Careers. Journal of Popular Culture, 17, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1985). Six Constraints on the Production of Literary Works. Poetics, 14: 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1997). Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, D. (1991). Creativity and Constraint in the British Film Industry. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redvall, E. (2012). A Systems View of Film Making as a Creative Practice. Northern Lights, 10, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redvall, E. (2016). Film and Media Production as a Screen Idea System. In P. McIntyre, J. Fulton, & E. Paton (Eds), The Creative System in Action: Understanding Cultural Production and Practice (pp. 139–154). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddock, A. (2001). Understanding Audiences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M., & Pritzker, S. (Eds). (1999). Encyclopedia of Creativity. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2006). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2010). Individual and Group Creativity. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 146–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2011). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. (2003). Creative Cultures, Nations and Civilisations: Strategies and Results. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (pp. 304–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. (2004). Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair, R., Nelson, C., & Rodriguez, W. (2005). Habitus and Communication Theory. Intercultural Communication Studies, 13(4), 142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (Ed.). (1988). The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1945). The Art of Thought. London: C. A. Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. (1993). The Social Production of Art (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip McIntyre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McIntyre, P. (2018). Using Practitioner-Based Enquiry (PBE) to Examine Screen Production as a Form of Creative Practice. In: Batty, C., Kerrigan, S. (eds) Screen Production Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62837-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics