Striving for Local Governance Capacity in Portugal and Spain
Despite the well-known differences regarding the level of devolution in Portugal and Spain, inter-municipal associations (IMAs) emerged as a relevant piece of the institutional systems. The strategies to foster these bodies, however, have been different. While Portugal opted to promote them very clearly, on the verge of employing a top-down logic, Spanish authorities are trying to control IMAs and even reduce their number. Despite the different scenarios, both countries are striving to ensure the governance capacity of inter-municipal collaborative endeavours, struggling for the emergency of a new political actor able to function effectively. This chapter seeks to present an index of governance capacity and measure the performance of both countries across the different dimensions of the index.
Esther Pano Puey would like to acknowledge the support of the programme CSO2013-48641-C2-1-R (Ministry of Economy) Project—Local Government Reform, efficiency, rescaling and democracy (LoGoRef) and also the programme from the Catalan Government 2014 SGR 838. Patrícia Silva would like to acknowledge the support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, and the European Social Fund through the Operational Programme Human Capital (HCOP), under grant SFRH/BPD/93149/2013.
- Airaksinen, J., & Haveri, A. (2003). Networks and hierarchies in inter-municipal co-operation: Are networks really light and flexible and hierarchies sticky and rigid? Paper presented at the Conference of European Group of Public Administration, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Dubreuil, G. H., & Baudé, S. (2008). Innovative approaches to stakeholder involvement in risk governance. Lessons from TRUSTNET IN ACTION European research project. In E. Vos (Ed.), European risk governance its science, its inclusiveness and its effectiveness (pp. 123–152). Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.Google Scholar
- Frischtak, L. L. (1994). Governance capacity and economic reform in developing countries. World Bank Technical Papers, The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Fukuda-Parr, S., Lopes, C., & Malik, K. (2002). Overview: Institutional innovations for capacity development. In S. Fukuda-Parr, C. Lopes, & K. Malik (Eds.), Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems (pp. 1–21). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Lopes, L. (2009). O Regime das Comunidades Intermunicipais: mais um caso exemplar de degradaçao da autonomia municipal. Revista de Direito Público E Regulaçao, 2, 9–18.Google Scholar
- Mäeltsemees, S., Lõhmus, M., & Ratas, J. (2013). Inter-municipal cooperation: Possibility for advancing local democracy and subsidiarity in Estonia. Halduskultuur—Administrative Culture, 14(1), 73–97.Google Scholar
- Magre, J., & Pano, E. (2016). Delivery of municipal services in Spain: An uncertain picture. In H. Wollmann, I. Kopric, & G. Marcou (Eds.), Public and social services in Europe. From public and municipal to private sector provision (pp. 119–134). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Nico, R. (2013). O papel das Comunidades Intermunicipais na descentralização administrativa – O caso da Comunidade Intermunicipal do Médio Tejo. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas – Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2008). OECD territorial reviews OECD territorial reviews: Portugal 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Oliveira, F. P. (2009). The evolution and regulation of the metropolitan areas in Portugal. Paper presented at city futures, June 4–6, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid.Google Scholar
- Rakar, I., Tičar, B., & Klun, M. (2015). Inter-municipal cooperation: Challenges in Europe and in Slovenia. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 45, 185–200.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, M. (2015). Southern welfare in social science: A “southern European model”? In M. Baumeister & R. Sala (Eds.), Southern Europe?: Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Greece from the 1950s until the present day (pp. 51–76). Chicago: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Press, Ed.Google Scholar
- Scott, A. J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., & Storper, M. (2001). Global city regions. In A. J. Scott (Ed.), Global city regions: Trends, theory and policy (pp. 11–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Silva, P., Ferreira, J., & Teles, F. (forthcoming). Intermunicipal cooperation: The quest for governance capacity? International Review of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
- Silva, P., Teles, F., & Pires, A. R. (2016). Paving the (hard) way for regional partnerships: Evidences from Portugal. Regional & Federal Studies, 1–26.Google Scholar
- Teles, F. (2014). Local government and the bailout: Reform singularities in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–13.Google Scholar
- van den Berg, L., & Braun, E. (1999). Urban competitiveness, marketing and the need for organising capacity. Urban Studies, 36(5), 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993312.
- Warner, M. E. (2006). Inter-municipal cooperation in the U.S: A regional governance solution? Urban Public Economics Review/Revista de Economia Pública Urbana, 7, 132–151.Google Scholar