A Borrowed Mandate? Democratic Legitimacy of Inter-municipal Entities: A Comparative Analysis

  • Adam Gendźwiłł
  • Marta Lackowska
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the democratic legitimacy of inter-municipal unions. Inter-municipal cooperation entities are frequently criticized for the “democratic deficit”, that is, lack of elected governing bodies, directly accountable to the citizens. The authors broaden this framework, by distinguishing the input, output and throughput dimensions of legitimacy. The empirical investigation is based mainly on the international survey of inter-municipal entities in four European countries: Portugal, Spain (Catalonia), Czech Republic and Poland. The chapter presents several survey indicators of legitimacy and analyses their variation between and within studied countries.

References

  1. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cini, M., & Borragan, P.-S. (Eds.). (2010). European union politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. de la Fuente, J. M. R., & Schaap, L. (2007). Democratic legitimacy of inter-municipal and regional governance. In V. Bekkers, G. Dijkstra, A. Edwardss, & M. Fenger (Eds.), Governance and the democratic deficit. Assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practices (pp. 203–221). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Dowding, K., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Intralocal competition and cooperation. In K. Mossberger, S. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 29–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Hertzog, R., Swianiewicz, P., Davey, K., & Balducci, M. (2010). Toolkit manual: Inter-municipal cooperation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe—UNDP—LGI Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Hix, S. (2013). What’s wrong with the Europe union and how to fix it. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmann-Martinot, V. (2003). The French Republic, one yet divisible? In Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency (pp. 157–182). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  11. Hulst, R., & van Montfort, A. (2007). Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jachtenfuchs, M., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2004). Governance in der Europaischen Union. In A. Benz (Ed.), Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen (pp. 77–101). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Socialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knodt, M. (2005). Regieren im erweiterten europaischen Mehrebenensystem. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  14. Moravcsik, A. (2002). Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.Google Scholar
  15. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41(s1), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva P., Ferreira J., & Teles F. (2016, 30 June). Inter-municipal cooperation in Portugal: The quest for governance capacity? Paper presented at the COST Loc-Ref workshop on IMC in Warsaw.Google Scholar
  22. Swianiewicz, P., Gendźwiłł, A., Krukowska, J., Lackowska, M., & Picej, A. (2016). Współpraca międzygminna. Związek z rozsądku. Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
  23. Teles, F. (2016). Local governance and inter-municipal cooperation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wollmann, H. (2010). Comparing two logics of inter-local cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review, 46(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Gendźwiłł
    • 1
  • Marta Lackowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations