Advertisement

Actors in Inter-municipal Cooperation

  • Pawel Swianiewicz
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the role of various policy actors: mayors, councillors and bureaucrats, in initiating and conducting activities related to inter-municipal cooperation. Empirical data have been collected through a survey of inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) offices in eight European countries. Using the concept of leadership type and the index of mayoral strength, the variation among the studied countries, as well as variation among municipalities within the country, has been analysed. Empirical tests confirm that mayors are usually the most active and the most powerful actors in inter-municipal cooperation, even in countries which have not adopted the strong-mayor model. Moreover, more developed institutional structures of IMC attract greater attention from mayors than do cases of weaker institutionalization of IMC.

References

  1. Borraz, O., & Le Gales, P. (2005). France: The inter-municipal revolution. In B. Denters & L. Rose (Eds.), Comparing local governance: Trends and developments. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Dafflon, N. (2012). Voluntary amalgamation of local governments: The Swiss debate in the European context. International Center for Public Policy, Working Paper 12-04, Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Haveri, A. (2003). Inter-municipal cooperation as a part of local governance. Finnish Local Government Studies, 31, 316–325.Google Scholar
  4. Heinelt, H., & Hlepas, N. (2006). Typologies of local government systems. In H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, & A. Magnier (Eds.), The European mayor: Political leaders in the changing context of local democracy (pp. 21–42). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinelt, H., Hlepas, N., Kuhlmann, S., & Swianiewicz, P. (2017, forthcoming). Local government systems: Capturing the institutional setting in which mayors have to act by typologies and indices. In H. Heinelt, A. Magnier, M. Cabria, & H. Reynaert (Eds.), Political leaders and changing local democracy. The European Mayor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Mouritzen, P. E., & Svara, J. (2002). Leadership in the apex. Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  7. Négrier, M. (2005). The new French dice: Metropolitan institutions building democratic issues. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 29–46). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Swianiewicz, P., & Teles, F. (2016). The institutionalisation of inter-municipal arrangements in Europe: Findings from the unusual suspects, paper presented at the COST LocRef Project Seminar Inter-municipal cooperation and sub-municipal units in Europe, Warsaw, June 30–July 1.Google Scholar
  9. Wollmann, H. (2010). Comparing two logics of inter-local cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review, 46(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zerbinati, S. (2012). Multi-level governance and EU structural funds: An entrepreneurial local government perspective. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zerbinati, S., & Souitaris, V. (2005). Entrepreneurship in the public sector: A framework of analysis in European local governments. Entrepreneurship and Local Development, 17(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pawel Swianiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations