Abstract
This conclusion builds on the conceptual foundations of our previous collaborative work on decolonizing knowledge production in and about (post)socialist societies. We develop three decolonial strategies to disrupt and complicate accounts of childhood, schooling, and subjectivities framed by and embedded in the epistemologies of modernity, socialist ideologies, and post-socialist “Westernization” projects. First, we highlight how memories of children’s lived experiences—situated in local and personal histories—enable us to multiply cultural imaginaries about childhood. Second, we trace relationalities between seemingly disparate spaces and times of childhoods, disrupting the linearity and singularity of time/space. Finally, we discuss how coloniality of knowledge and being affects the various subjectivities we present about ourselves as children and researchers, and how memory research (re)shapes us in return.
Notes
- 1.
Coloniality represents “the darker side of Western modernity” upon which Western empires founded themselves, as well as justified their imperial expansion and intervention across the world—whether as Christianity, civilization, modernization, and development after the World War II or market democracy after the fall of the Berlin Wall (Mignolo, 2001). Because “coloniality is constitutive and not derivative of modernity,” it is often written as “modernity/coloniality”: “The slash (/) that divides and unites modernity with coloniality means that coloniality is constitutive of modernity: there is no modernity without coloniality” (Mignolo, 2015, p. 2). Mignolo (2007) argues that both European and socialist traditions of the European Enlightenment carry a universal emancipating claim, terming it the “myth of modernity.” The concept of emancipation is based on the three revolutions of the eighteenth-century Europe that set the bourgeoisie free. The revolutions translated the idea into “the universal term of “humanity” (freedom) and set … the stage to export emancipation all over the world” (Mignolo, 2007, p. 455).
References
Balagopalan, S. (2014). ‘Childhood’: Children, labour and schooling in postcolonial India. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blazek, M. (2015). Rematerialising children’s agency: Everyday practices in a post-socialist estate. Bristol: Policy Press.
Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.
Burman, E. (2008). Developments: Child, image, nation. London: Brunner-Routledge.
Burman, E. (2016a). Fanon and the child: Pedagogies of subjectification and transformation. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(3), 265–285.
Burman, E. (2016b). Child as method: Cultural-historical applications. Plenary keynote for South and Central Europe and Middle East Section of the International Society for Cultural-Historical and Activity Research (ISCAR), University of Crete, Rethymno, June.
Cannella, G. S., & Viruru, R. (2004). Childhood and postcolonization: Power, education, and contemporary practice. New York: Psychology Press.
Chatterjee, C., & Petrone, K. (2008). Models of selfhood and subjectivity: The Soviet case in historical perspective. Slavic Review, 67(4), 967–986.
Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Towards deimperialization. Durham: Duke University Press.
Foucault, M. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault—October 25th, 1982. In L. H. Martin et al. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 9–15). London: Tavistock.
Gonick, M., & Gannon, S. (2014). Becoming girl: Collective biography and the production of girlhood. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.
Grosz, E. (1999). Becoming … an introduction. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2008). Experience and “I” in autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 299–318.
Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011). Are there politics in childhood? Space & Polity, 15, 21–34.
Kasulis, T. P. (1998). Intimacy or integrity: Philosophy and cultural difference. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Katz, C. (2008). Cultural geographies lecture: Childhood as spectacle: Relays of anxiety and the reconfiguration of the child. Cultural Geographies, 15, 5–17.
Katz, C. (2011). Accumulation, excess, childhood: Toward a countertopography of risk and waste. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 57(1), 47–60.
Kelly, C. (2007). Children’s world: Growing up in Russia, 1890–1991. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Kirschenbaum, L. A. (2001). Small comrades: Revolutionizing childhood in Soviet Russia, 1917–1932. London: Routledge Falmer.
Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Leung, C., & Ruan, J. (2012). Perspectives on teaching and learning Chinese literacy in China. Dordrecht: Springer.
Levinas, E. (1969 [1961]). Totality and infinity: An essay in exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270.
Mead, M. A., & Silova, I. (2013). Literacies of (post)socialist childhood: Alternative readings of socialist upbringings and neoliberal regimes. Globalization, Societies, Education, 11, 194–222.
Mignolo, W. (2001). Coloniality of power and subalternity. In I. Rodríguez (Ed.), The Latin American subaltern studies reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449–514.
Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2013). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking, and epistemic disobedience. Confero, 1(1), 129–150.
Mignolo, W. (2015). Foreword: Yes, we can. In H. Dabashi (Ed.), Can non-Europeans think? London: Zed.
Millei, Z. (2011). Governing through the early childhood curriculum, ‘the child’, and ‘community’: Ideologies of socialist Hungary and neoliberal Australia. European Education, 43, 33–55.
Millei, Z., & Joronen, M. (2016). The (bio)politicization of neuroscience in Australian early years policies: Fostering brain-resources as human capital. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 389–404.
Millei, Z., & Kallio, K. P. (forthcoming). Recognizing politics in the nursery: Early childhood education institutions as sites of mundane politics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116677498
Millei, Z., & Petersen, B. E. (2015). Complicating ‘student behaviour’: Exploring the discursive constitution of ‘learner subjectivities’. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 20(1), 20–34.
Nugin, R., & Jõesalu, K. (2016). Narrating surroundings and suppression: The role of school in Soviet childhood memories. European Education, 48(3), 203–219.
Oswell, D. (2012). The agency of children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and the making of society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
Rappleye, J., & Komatsu, H. (2017). How to make lesson study work in America and worldwide: A Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education. Research in Comparative and International Education, 12(4).
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. New York: Routledge.
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
Sáska, G. (2005). The anti-capitalist and anti-democratic concept of social equality in 20th century educational ideologies. Magyar Pedagógia, 105(1), 83–99.
Silova, I., Millei, Z., & Piattoeva, N. (2017). Interrupting the coloniality of knowledge production in comparative education: Postsocialist and postcolonial dialogues after the Cold War. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S74–S102.
Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225–243.
Spivak, G. (1976). Translator’s preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology (p. lxxvii). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Stepanenko, V. (1999). The construction of identity and school policy in Ukraine. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
Takayama, K. (2016). Deploying the post-colonial predicaments of researching on/with ‘Asia ’in education: A standpoint from a rich peripheral country. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 70–88.
Tlostanova, M. (2012). Postsocialist≠postcolonial? On post-Soviet imaginary and globalcoloniality. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48(2), 130–142.
Tlostanova, M. (2013). Post-Soviet imaginary and global coloniality: A gendered perspective [Interview with Madina Tlostanova]. [Online]. Available: http://www.kronotop.org/ftexts/interview-with-madinatlostanova/
Tlostanova, M., Koobak, R., & Thapar-Bjorkert, S. (2016). Border thinking and disidentification: Postcolonial and postsocialist feminist dialogues. Feminist Theory, 17(2), 211–228.
Yelland, N., & Saltmarsh, S. (2013). Ethnography, multiplicity and the global childhoods project: Reflections on establishing an interdisciplinary, transnational, multi-sited research collaboration. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(1), 2–11.
Zhang, H., Chan, P. W. K., & Kenway, J. (Eds.). (2015). Asia as method in education studies: A defiant research imagination. Abingdon: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Millei, Z., Silova, I., Piattoeva, N. (2018). Towards Decolonizing Childhood and Knowledge Production. In: Silova, I., Piattoeva, N., Millei, Z. (eds) Childhood and Schooling in (Post)Socialist Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62791-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62791-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62790-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62791-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)