Advertisement

Fans and Vampires at Home

  • Lucy I. BakerEmail author
Chapter
  • 391 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Gothic book series (PAGO)

Abstract

Focusing on the films What We do in the Shadows and Twilight, alongside fan performances of hospitality ranging from creative works to bodily modification, this chapter investigates the ways in which the domestic environment of both vampires and humans alike function as a site of hospitality informed by “fannishness” and the attempt to welcome the monstrous into the home. The vampiric home is a liminal space, at once a site of hospitality towards the predator, a place where violence is acceptable and where domestic chores and duties function as a constant drain.

References

  1. Brody, Susan. 2014. Twilight: The Unveiling of Victims, Stalking, and Domestic Violence. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender 21 (39): 41–93.Google Scholar
  2. Browning, John Edgar. 2015. The Real Vampires of New Orleans and Buffalo: A Research Note towards Comparative Ethnography. Palgrave Communications 1 (15006). doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2015.6.
  3. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. 1997. Monster Culture (Seven Theses). In Monster Theory: Reading Culture, ed. Jeffrey Jerome, 3–25. Cohen, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Debruge, Peter. 2008. Stephenie Meyer. Variety 7 (30). http://variety.com/2008/scene/markets-festivals/stephenie-meyer-1117989820/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  5. Eate, Penelope. 2015. A New Dawn Breaks. In In Fan Girls and the Media: Creating Characters, Consuming Culture, ed. Adrienne Trier-Bieniek, 21–43. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Gunnels, Jen, and Carrie J. Cole. 2001. Culturally Mapping Universes: Fan Production as Ethnographic Fragments. Transformative Works and Cultures 7. doi: 10.3983/twc.2011.0241.
  7. Howell, Amanda. 2016. The Mirror and the Window: The Seduction of Innocence and Gothic Coming of Age in Låt Den Rätte Komma In/Let the Right One In. Gothic Studies 18 (1): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins, Henry. 2007. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture (20th Anniversary Edition). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen, Katherine, and Lynn Zubernis. 2012. Fandom at the Crossroads: Celebration, Shame, and Fan/Producer Relationships. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Marcus, Clare Cooper. 1995. House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home. Berwick, ME: Nicolas-Hays.Google Scholar
  11. Meyer, Stephenie. 2005. The Story of Twilight & Getting Published. Stephenie Meyer 9 (10). http://stepheniemeyer.com/the-story-of-twilight-getting-published/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  12. ———. 2006. Twilight. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. Breaking Dawn. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  14. Rein*Hagen, Mark. 1991. Vampire: The Masquerade. Stone Mountain: White Wolf Publishing. Google Scholar
  15. Sandvoss, Cornel. 2005. Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Scodari, Christine. 2007. Yoko in Cyberspace with Beatles Fans: Gender and the Re-Creation of Popular Mythology. In Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World, eds. Jonathan Gray, Cornell Sandvoss, and C. Lee Harrington, 48–60. New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shildrick, Margrit, and Deborah Lynn Steinberg. 2015. Estranged Bodies: Shifting Paradigms and the Biomedical Imaginary. Body & Society 21 (3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silver, Anna. 2010. ‘Twilight’ is not Good for Maidens: Gender, Sexuality, and the Family in Stephenie Meyer’s ‘Twilight’ Series. Studies in the Novel 42 (1/2): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stoker, Bram. (1897) 1993. Dracula. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
  20. Tenga, Angela, and Elizabeth Zimmerman. 2013. Vampire Gentlemen and Zombie Beasts: A Rendering of True Monstrosity. Gothic Studies 15 (1): 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. What We Do in the Shadows. 2014. Directed by Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement. Madman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities, Languages and Social SciencesGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations