Introduction

  • Bronwyn Winter
  • Maxime Forest
  • Réjane Sénac
Chapter
Part of the Global Queer Politics book series (GQP)

Abstract

Same-sex marriage is now legal in over 20 countries and under debate in several more. All of the countries where legalization has occurred are liberal capitalist democracies, but they present considerable diversity in their history, political cultures, political and legal systems, and in the interactions of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ) movement and the state. Those countries where same-sex marriage has been explicitly blocked through laws, referendums, or court decisions present a comparable diversity. This book discusses that variety across the world’s five continents. Using a neo-institutionalist analytical framework (historical, sociological, and discursive), the book examines the tensions between globalization, supra-nationalization (in the case of the European Union) and national institutional, political, and social path dependencies. Each chapter compares two to four countries in the same region and/or having historical links and institutional similarities.

Keywords

Same-sex marriage Neo-institutionalisms Comparative analysis Globalization Path dependency 

References

  1. Aloni, Erez. 2010. Incrementalism, Civil Unions and the Possibility of Predicting Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 18: 105–161.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, Alba, María Bustelo, Maxime Forest, and Emanuela Lombardo. 2012. Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Southern Europe: Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, ed. Andrea Krizsan, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires, 148–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayoub, Phillip M. 2016. When States Come Out: Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacchi, Carole Lee. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  5. Badgett, M.V. Lee. 2005. Predicting Partnership Rights: Applying the European Experience to the United States. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 17(1), Article 4. Accessed April 20, 2017. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol17/iss1/4/
  6. ———. 2009. When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baisley, Elizabeth. 2016. Reaching the Tipping Point? Emerging International Human Rights Norms Pertaining to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Human Rights Quarterly 38 (1): 134–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, Mary, and Nancy A. Naples. 2015. Altared States: Legal Structuring and Relationship Recognition in the United States, Canada, and Australia. American Sociological Review 80 (6): 1226–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernstein, Mary, and Verta A. Taylor. 2013. The Marrying Kind? Debating Same-Sex Marriage within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carstensen, Martin B., and Vivien A. Schmidt. 2016. Power Through, Over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Díez, Jordi. 2016. The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolowitz, David, and David Marsh. 1996. Who Learns What From Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political studies 14 (2): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorf, Michael C., and Sidney Tarrow. 2014. Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena. Law and Social Inquiry 39 (2): 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The New Homonormativity. In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, ed. Russ Castronovo and Dana D. Nelson, 175–194. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faderman, Lillian. 2016. The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Ferree, Myra Marx, William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies. Theory and Society 31 (3): 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellum, Anne, ed. 2016. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, Carol, and Manon Tremblay. 2016. Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada: Institutions and Political Will. Government and Opposition 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.36.
  20. Joint Statement on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. 2008. Delivered by Argentina on Behalf of 66 States, December 18, 2008. New York: UN General Assembly. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/sogi-statements/2008-joint-statement/
  21. Kantola, Johanna. 2006. Feminists Theorize the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lennox, Connie, and Matthew Waites, eds. 2013. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth. London: Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  23. Lombardo, Emanuela, and Maxime Forest, eds. 2012. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. A Discursive-Sociological Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo, eds. 2009. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy-Making. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matía Portilla Francsico, J. 2013. Interpretación evolutiva de la Constitución y legitimidad del matrimonio formado por personas del mismo sexo. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional 31: 543.Google Scholar
  28. Mello, Joseph. 2016. The Courts, the Ballot Box, and Gay Rights: How Our Governing Institutions Shape the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mezey, Susan. 2007. Queers in Court: Gay Rights Law and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2009. Gay Families and the Courts: The Quest for Equal Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. O’Flaherty, Michael, and John Fisher. 2008. Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and International Human Rights Law. Human Rights Law Review 8 (2): 207–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Offord, Baden. 2003. Homosexual Rights as Human Rights: Activism in Indonesia, Singapore and Australia. Oxford and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. Outshoorn, Joyce, Radka Dudova, Ana Prata, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2015. Women’s Movements and Bodily Integrity. In European Women’s Movements and Body Politics: The Struggle for Autonomy, ed. Joyce Outshoorn, 1–21. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panizza, Francisco, and Romina Miorelli. 2013. Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory. Political Studies 61: 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierceson, Jason. 2014. Same-Sex Marriage in the United States: The Road to the Supreme Court and Beyond. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Rydstrom, Jens. 2011. Odd Couples: A History of Gay Marriage in Scandinavia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2010. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909 99021X.
  39. Slootmaeckers, Koen, Heleen Touquet, and Peter Vermeersch, eds. 2016. The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, Miriam. 2008. Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Stark, David, and Laszlo Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. The Yogyakarata Principles. 2006. Accessed 13 May, 2010. www.yogyakartaprinciples.org
  43. Tremblay, Manon, David Paternotte, and Carol Johnson, eds. 2011. The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State. Farnham, Surrey & Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. UN Human Rights Council. 2011. Resolution on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity,Geneva: A/HRC/RES/17/19, June 17. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/LGBTUNResolutions.aspx
  45. ———. 2014. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Geneva: A/HRC/RES/27/32, September 26. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/LGBTUNResolutions.aspx
  46. Verdrager, Pierre. 2014. La France sur son 31. Ils/elles racontent leur “mariage pour tous”. Paris: Des Ailes sur un Tracteur.Google Scholar
  47. Verloo, Mieke, ed. 2005. Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality. Social Politics 12 (3): 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi019.
  48. ———. 2007. Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Waaldrijk, Kees. 2001. Small Change: How the Road to Same-Sex Marriage Got Paved in the Netherlands. In Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnership: A Study of National, European and International Law, ed. Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenæs, 437–464. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Weiss, Meredith L., and Michael J. Bosia. 2013. Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bronwyn Winter
    • 1
  • Maxime Forest
    • 2
  • Réjane Sénac
    • 3
  1. 1.European StudiesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Effective Gender Equality in Research and the Academia, Framework Project 7OFCE-Sciences PoParisFrance
  3. 3.Centre de recherches politiques de Sciences PoCNRS - Sciences Po, PRESAGEParisFrance

Personalised recommendations