Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Global Queer Politics ((GQP))

Abstract

Same-sex marriage is now legal in over 20 countries and under debate in several more. All of the countries where legalization has occurred are liberal capitalist democracies, but they present considerable diversity in their history, political cultures, political and legal systems, and in the interactions of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ) movement and the state. Those countries where same-sex marriage has been explicitly blocked through laws, referendums, or court decisions present a comparable diversity. This book discusses that variety across the world’s five continents. Using a neo-institutionalist analytical framework (historical, sociological, and discursive), the book examines the tensions between globalization, supra-nationalization (in the case of the European Union) and national institutional, political, and social path dependencies. Each chapter compares two to four countries in the same region and/or having historical links and institutional similarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aloni, Erez. 2010. Incrementalism, Civil Unions and the Possibility of Predicting Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 18: 105–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, Alba, María Bustelo, Maxime Forest, and Emanuela Lombardo. 2012. Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Southern Europe: Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, ed. Andrea Krizsan, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires, 148–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, Phillip M. 2016. When States Come Out: Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, Carole Lee. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M.V. Lee. 2005. Predicting Partnership Rights: Applying the European Experience to the United States. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 17(1), Article 4. Accessed April 20, 2017. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol17/iss1/4/

  • ———. 2009. When Gay People Get Married: What Happens When Societies Legalize Same-Sex Marriage. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baisley, Elizabeth. 2016. Reaching the Tipping Point? Emerging International Human Rights Norms Pertaining to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Human Rights Quarterly 38 (1): 134–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Mary, and Nancy A. Naples. 2015. Altared States: Legal Structuring and Relationship Recognition in the United States, Canada, and Australia. American Sociological Review 80 (6): 1226–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Mary, and Verta A. Taylor. 2013. The Marrying Kind? Debating Same-Sex Marriage within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, Martin B., and Vivien A. Schmidt. 2016. Power Through, Over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díez, Jordi. 2016. The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, David, and David Marsh. 1996. Who Learns What From Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political studies 14 (2): 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, Michael C., and Sidney Tarrow. 2014. Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena. Law and Social Inquiry 39 (2): 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The New Homonormativity. In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, ed. Russ Castronovo and Dana D. Nelson, 175–194. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faderman, Lillian. 2016. The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx, William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies. Theory and Society 31 (3): 289–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellum, Anne, ed. 2016. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Carol, and Manon Tremblay. 2016. Comparing Same-Sex Marriage in Australia and Canada: Institutions and Political Will. Government and Opposition 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.36.

  • Joint Statement on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. 2008. Delivered by Argentina on Behalf of 66 States, December 18, 2008. New York: UN General Assembly. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/sogi-statements/2008-joint-statement/

  • Kantola, Johanna. 2006. Feminists Theorize the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, Connie, and Matthew Waites, eds. 2013. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth. London: Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Emanuela, and Maxime Forest, eds. 2012. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. A Discursive-Sociological Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier, and Mieke Verloo, eds. 2009. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy-Making. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matía Portilla Francsico, J. 2013. Interpretación evolutiva de la Constitución y legitimidad del matrimonio formado por personas del mismo sexo. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional 31: 543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, Joseph. 2016. The Courts, the Ballot Box, and Gay Rights: How Our Governing Institutions Shape the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey, Susan. 2007. Queers in Court: Gay Rights Law and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Gay Families and the Courts: The Quest for Equal Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, Michael, and John Fisher. 2008. Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and International Human Rights Law. Human Rights Law Review 8 (2): 207–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offord, Baden. 2003. Homosexual Rights as Human Rights: Activism in Indonesia, Singapore and Australia. Oxford and New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, Joyce, Radka Dudova, Ana Prata, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2015. Women’s Movements and Bodily Integrity. In European Women’s Movements and Body Politics: The Struggle for Autonomy, ed. Joyce Outshoorn, 1–21. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Francisco, and Romina Miorelli. 2013. Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory. Political Studies 61: 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierceson, Jason. 2014. Same-Sex Marriage in the United States: The Road to the Supreme Court and Beyond. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydstrom, Jens. 2011. Odd Couples: A History of Gay Marriage in Scandinavia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909 99021X.

  • Slootmaeckers, Koen, Heleen Touquet, and Peter Vermeersch, eds. 2016. The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Miriam. 2008. Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David, and Laszlo Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Yogyakarata Principles. 2006. Accessed 13 May, 2010. www.yogyakartaprinciples.org

  • Tremblay, Manon, David Paternotte, and Carol Johnson, eds. 2011. The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State. Farnham, Surrey & Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council. 2011. Resolution on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity,Geneva: A/HRC/RES/17/19, June 17. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/LGBTUNResolutions.aspx

  • ———. 2014. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Geneva: A/HRC/RES/27/32, September 26. Accessed 15 September 2016. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/LGBTUNResolutions.aspx

  • Verdrager, Pierre. 2014. La France sur son 31. Ils/elles racontent leur “mariage pour tous”. Paris: Des Ailes sur un Tracteur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, Mieke, ed. 2005. Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality. Social Politics 12 (3): 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi019.

  • ———. 2007. Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waaldrijk, Kees. 2001. Small Change: How the Road to Same-Sex Marriage Got Paved in the Netherlands. In Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnership: A Study of National, European and International Law, ed. Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenæs, 437–464. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Meredith L., and Michael J. Bosia. 2013. Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

The editors thank a number of this book’s authors for their significant contributions to our discussion of neo-institutionalism and notably discursive institutionalism in this Introduction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Winter, B., Forest, M., Sénac, R. (2018). Introduction. In: Winter, B., Forest, M., Sénac, R. (eds) Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage. Global Queer Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics