Advertisement

A Labour of Love: Fantrepreneurship in Home Video Media Distribution

  • Oliver Carter
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter uses a cultural and economic approach to examine the activities of one specific home video distribution company, the American independent label Vinegar Syndrome, as a case study of a successful and innovative fan enterprise. Established in 2012, the label specialises in releasing exploitation films on DVD, Blu-Ray and video-on-demand. The company is run by fans of cult cinema and uses a business model uncommon in independent home video media distribution, which involves them recovering, digitally restoring and releasing titles that are part of their extensive personal archive of exploitation films. I draw on an organisational analysis of the company and interview material to illustrate how the practices involved in running Vinegar Syndrome can be understood as fantrepreneurship.

Bibliography

  1. Barlow, A. 2004. The DVD Revolution: Movies, Culture, and Technology. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Benson-Allott, C. 2013. Killer Tapes and Shattered Screens: Video Spectatorship from VHS to File Sharing. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biltereyst, D., and P. Meers. 2011. The Political Economy of Audiences. In The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, ed. J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa, 415–435. West Sussex: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Brooker, W. 2002. Using the Force: Creativity, Community and Star Wars Fans. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Church, D. 2011. From Exhibition to Genre: The Case of Grind-House Films. Cinema Journal 50 (4): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Church, D. 2013. Desiring to Merge: Restoring Value in Niche-Interest Adult DVDs. Film International 11 (3/4): 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, J. 1993. Style. In Resistance through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-war Britain, 2nd ed., ed. S. Hall and T. Jefferson, 147–161. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, M. 2007. The 2001st Maniac: An Interview with Herschell Gordon Lewis. In Film Out of Bounds: Essays and Interviews on Non-Mainstream Cinema Worldwide, ed. M. Edwards, 40–49. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, S., and T. Jefferson. 1993. Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-war Britain, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hebdige, D. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hills, M. 2002. Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodkinson, P. 2002. Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture. Oxford: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkins, H. 1992. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kacsuk, Z. 2011. Subcultural entrepreneurs, path dependencies and fan reactions: The case of NARUTO in Hungary. Paper presented at Intercultural Crossovers, Transcultural Flows: Manga/Comics, Cultural Institute of Japan, Cologne, Sep 30–Oct 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Klinger, B. 2005. Beyond the Multiplex: Cinema, New Technologies, and the Home. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mathijs, Ernest, and Jamie Sexton. 2011. Cult Cinema. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathijs, Ernest, and Xavier Mendik. 2008. The Concepts of Cult. In The Cult Film Reader, ed. E. Mathijs and X. Mendik, 1–24. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald, P. 2007. Video and DVD Industries. London: BFI/Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  20. McRobbie, A. 1997. Second-Hand Dresses and the Role of the Ragmarket. In The Subcultures Reader, ed. K. Gelder, 191–199. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Mosco, V. 2009. The Political Economy of Communication. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schauer, B., and S. Arosteguy. 2005. The Criterion Collection in the New Home Video Market: An Interview with Susan Arosteguy. The Velvet Light Trap 56 (1): 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations