Virtual Teams Stress Experiment Proposal: Investigating the Effect of Cohesion, Challenge, and Hindrance on Knowledge Sharing, Satisfaction, and Performance

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 731)

Abstract

This current paper will present a research proposal with regard to the effect of stress on virtual teams. The proposed research will specifically concentrate on the virtual teams’ stress as double constructs (positive stress as the challenge and negative stress as the hindrance), cohesion as social support to mitigate the stress, and how these three factors will affect the virtual teams’ knowledge sharing, satisfaction, and performances. A study which incorporates an experimental research methodology will be specifically proposed to test the aforementioned relationships. Related literature reviews on stress, hypotheses development, as well as experimental research design will be mentioned in the paper.

Keywords

Virtual Teams Stress Challenge Hindrance Knowledge sharing Experimental research design 

References

  1. 1.
    Levi, D.: Group Dynamics for Teams. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Javernpaa, S.L., Leidner, D.E.: Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10, 791–815 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iacono, C.S., Weisband, S.: Developing trust in virtual teams. In: Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 412–420. IEEE Computer Society Press (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergiel, B.J., Bergiel, E.B., Balsmeier, P.W.: Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 31, 99–110 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salisbury, W.D., Carte, T.A., Chidambaram, L.: Cohesion in virtual teams: validating the perceived cohesion scale in a distributed setting. ACM SIGMIS Database 37, 147–155 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.-K.: Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 237–274 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gardner, W., Scermerhorn, J.: Computer networks and the changing nature of managerial work. Public Product. Rev. 11, 85–89 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duxbury, L.E., Higgins, C.A., Irving, R.H.: Attitudes of managers and employees to telecommuting. Infor 25, 273–285 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crouch, M.-L., Montecino, V.: Teaching in Communities Online Conference (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., Purvis, R.: Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 35, 831–858 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carayon, P., Haims, M.C., Hoonakker, P.L.T., Swanson, N.G.: Teamswork and musculosketal health in the context of work organization interventions in office and computer work. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 7, 36–69 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Staal, M.A.: Stress, Cognition and Human Performance: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stokes, A.F., Kite, K.: On grasping a nettle and becoming emotional. In: Hancock, D. (ed.) Stress, Workload, and Fatigue. L. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lepine, J.A., Podsakoff, N.P., Lepine, M.A.: A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationship among stressor and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 48, 764–775 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cavanaugh, M.A., Boswell, W.R., Roehling, M.V., Boudreau, J.W.: An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 65–74 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marino, S.: The stress epidemic. Industry Week 246 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng, C., Cheung, M.W.L.: Cognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: differentiation and integration. J. Pers. 73, 860–886 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palmer, S., Cooper, C.: Creating a Balance: Managing Stress. British Library, London (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zwicker, A., DeLongis, A.: Gender, stress, and coping. In: Chrisler, J.C., McCreary, D.R. (eds.) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, Vancouver (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palloff, R., Pratt, K.: Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. Josey-Bass, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jimmieson, N.L., McKimmie, B.M., Hannam, R.L., Gallagher, J.: An investigation of the stress-buffering effects of social support in the occupational stress process as a function of teams identification. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 14, 350–367 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Driskell, J.E., Salas, E.: Does stress lead to a loss of teams perspective? Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 3, 291–302 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karau, S.J., Kelly, J.R.: The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28, 542–571 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., Volpe, C.E.: Defining competencies and establishing teams training requirements. In: Guzzo, R.A., Salas, E. (eds.) Teams Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, pp. 333–380. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glazer, S.: Cross cultural issues in stress and burnout. In: Handbook of Stress and Burnout in Health Care, pp. 79–93. Nova Science Publisher, Huntington (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Selye, H.: History and present status of the stress concept. In: Goldberger, L., Breznitz, S. (eds.) Handbook of Stress, pp. 7–17. Free Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lazarus, R., Folkman, S.: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCauley, C.D., Ruderman, M.N., Ohlott, P.J., Morrow, J.E.: Assesing the developmental components of managerial jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 79, 3–14 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leavy, R.L.: Social support and psychological disorder: a review. J. Community Psychol. 11, 3–21 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J.I., Fisher, J.: The role of social support in the process of work stress: a meta analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 54, 314–334 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    House, J.S.: Work Stress and Social Support. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1981)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Solberg, V.S.: Examination of self-efficacy, social support, and stress as predictors of psychological and physical distress among Hispanic college students. Hispanic J. Behav. Sci. 19, 182–201 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoo, Y., Alavi, M.: Media and group cohesion: relative influence on social presence, task participation, and group consesus. MIS Q. 25, 371–390 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosen, B., Furst, S., Blackburn, R.: Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Org. Dyn. 36, 259–273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I., Mykytyn, P.P.: Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teamss. Inf. Manag. 41, 303–321 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lurey, J.S., Raisinghani, M.S.: An empirical study of best practices in virtual teamss. Inf. Manag. 38, 523–544 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Matteson, M.T., Ivanchevich, J.M.: Controlling Work Stress: Effective Human Resource and Management Strategies. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin, C., Standing, C., Liu, Y.-C.: A model to develop effective virtual teams. Decis. Support Syst. 45, 1031–1045 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bock, W.G., Zmud, W.R., Kim, G.Y., Lee, N.J.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the toles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. 29, 87–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chidambaram, L.: Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Q. 20, 143–165 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Amy, E.: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 44, 350–383 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsPelita Harapan UniversityTangerangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations