Scripting Approaches in Mathematics Education pp 205-228 | Cite as

# Interjecting Scripting Studies into a Mathematics Education Research Program: The Case of Zero-Divisors and the Zero-Product Property

- 441 Downloads

## Abstract

The goals of this chapter are twofold. The first goal is to present our emerging research on students’ understanding of concepts in ring theory, specifically zero-divisors and the zero-product property (ZPP). This naturally includes discussion of our methods and how findings related to the ZPP were obtained and reconfirmed. The second goal, which is the one pertinent to the theme of this book, is to present student-generated scripts as a valuable, low-cost data source which can be used in conjunction with conventional data in order to confirm known results and generate new ones. We discuss the interplay of these data sources and how they have contributed to the progress of our research.

## Keywords

Zero-product property Proving Proof validation Abstract algebra Ring Group## References

- Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2005). Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24*(2), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Asiala, M., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. M., Morics, S., & Oktac, A. (1997). Development of students’ understanding of cosets, normality, and quotient groups.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16*(3), 241–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cook, J. P. (2012).
*A guided reinvention of ring, integral domain, and field*. The University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar - Cook, J. P. (2014). The emergence of algebraic structure: Students come to understand units and zero-divisors.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45*(3), 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cuoco, A. (2001). Mathematics for teaching.
*Notices of the AMS, 48*(2), 168–174.Google Scholar - Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27*(3), 267–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Firestone, W. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research.
*Educational Researcher, 22*, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gholamazad, S. (2007). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ experiences with the process of creating proofs. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 2, pp. 265–272). Seoul, Korea: PME.Google Scholar - Hazzan, O. (1999). Reducing abstraction level when learning abstract algebra concepts.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40*(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Decoding a proof of Fermat’s little theorem via script writing.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32*(3), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lakatos, I. (1976).
*Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery*. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Larsen, S. (2009). Reinventing the concepts of group and isomorphism: The case of Jessica and Sandra.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Larsen, S. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the group and isomorphism concepts.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32*(4), 712–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Larsen, S., Johnson, E., & Bartlo, J. (2013). Designing and scaling up an innovation in abstract algebra.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32*(4), 693–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Larsen, S., & Zandieh, M. (2008). Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67*(3), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leron, U., Hazzan, O., & Zazkis, R. (1995). Learning group isomorphism: A crossroads of many concepts.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29*(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
*Science, 349*(6251), aac4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6*(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Simpson, A., & Stehlíková, N. (2006). Apprehending mathematical structure: A case study of coming to understand a commutative ring.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61*(3), 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In
*Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education*(pp. 267–306). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar - Tall, D., de Lima, R. N., & Healy, L. (2014). Evolving a three-world framework for solving algebraic equations in the light of what a student has met before.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34*, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundations of mathematics education. In
*Proceedings of the annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 1, pp. 45–64). Mexico: PME Morelia.Google Scholar - Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables.
*The Ideas of Algebra, K-12*(8), 19.Google Scholar - Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48*(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, D. (2014). Proof-scripts as a lens for exploring students’ understanding of odd/even functions.
*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35*, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, D., & Zazkis, R. (2016). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of proof comprehension: Revisiting a proof of the Pythagorean theorem.
*International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 14*(4), 777–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. (2013).
*Lesson Play in Mathematics Education: A tool for research and professional development*. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2014). Script writing in the mathematics classroom: Imaginary conversations on the structure of numbers.
*Research in Mathematics Education, 16*(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar