Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 984 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Mathematics ((BRIEFSMATH))

Abstract

We do not master DNA’s language yet, but the recent biotechnological advances have enable us to edit genome sequences pretty much the way a text editor modifies written language. In this Chapter, we contextualize our results, and argue that they should be taken in account whenever Synthetic Biology creates artificial DNA sequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If we consider viruses as a life form, then we should include RNA as well, in which case Thymine is replaced by Uracil (U).

  2. 2.

    The analogy is not fully applicable. Hardwares are supposed to be unchangeable regardless their softwares; yet it is possible to change one species to another just replacing its genome [63].

  3. 3.

    Biological pathways.

  4. 4.

    Deleting and inserting DNA sequences wherever we want. The latest technology behind this is called CRISPR-CAS9. Originally, CRISPR-CAS9 is a prokaryotic system of defense, and it may be considered a genuine Lamarckian mechanism of evolution [58]. After been ridiculed for so long, Lamarck (1744–1829) is back [16].

  5. 5.

    Regulation for such godlike power is encouraged [1].

  6. 6.

    On May 13 2016, the New York Times published the article: “Scientists talk privately about creating a synthetic human genome.”

  7. 7.

    “Artificial” in the sense of “not found in nature.”

  8. 8.

    Avoiding mistake is one way to prevent disaster; however, little can be done to prevent an intentional catastrophe.

  9. 9.

    Or vice-versa.

  10. 10.

    Unfortunately, this evidence could not be assessed neither for nor against our hypothesis, because Dr. Venter’s group did not make their synthetic sequences publicly available.

References

  1. Akbari, O.S., Bellen, H.J., Bier, E., Bullock, S.L., Burt, A., Church, G.M., Cook, K.R., Duchek, P., Edwards, O.R., Esvelt, K.M., Gantz, V.M., Golic, K.G., Gratz, S.J., Harrison, M.M., Hayes, K.R., James, A.A., Kaufman, T.C., Knoblich, J., Malik, H.S., Matthews, K.A., O’Connor-Giles, K.M., Parks, A.L., Perrimon, N., Port, F., Russell, S., Ueda, R., Wildonger, J.: Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory - multiple stringent confinement strategies should be used whenever possible. Science 349(6251), 927–929 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery, O.T., MacLeod, C.M., McCarty, M.: Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococal types. J. Exp. Med. 79, 137 (1944)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breitling, R., Takano, E., Gardner, T.S.: Judging synthetic biology risks. Science 347(6218), 107 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chargaff, E.: Chemical specificity of nucleic acids and mechanism of their enzymatic degradation. Experimentia 6, 201 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chargaff, E.: Structure and function of nucleic acids as cell constituents. Fed. Proc. 10, 654–659 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chargaff, E.: Preface to a grammar of biology: a hundred years of nucleic acid research. Science 172, 637–642 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chernoff, Y.O.: Mutation processes at the protein level: is Lamarck back? Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 488(1), 39–64 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Courant, R., Robbins, H.: What is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Devlin, K.: Mathematics: The Science of Patterns - The Search for Order in Life, Mind, and the Universe. Scientific American Library/Henry Holt and Company, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobzhansky, T.: Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am. Biol. Teach. 35(3), 125–129 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dodd, M.S., Papineau, D., Grenne, T., Slack, J.F., Rittner, M., Pirajno, F., O’Neil, J., Little, C.T.S.: Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Nature 543, 60–64 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gantz, V.M., Bier, E.: The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science 348(6233), 442–444 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gantz, V.M., Jasinskiene, N., Tatarenkova, O., Fazekas, A., Macias, V.M., Bier, E., James, A.A.: Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, E6736–E6743 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner, M.: The Colossal Book of Mathematics. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy, G.H.: A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchison III, C.A., Chuang, R.-Y., Noskov, V.N., Assad-Garcia, N., Deerinck, T.J., Ellisman, M.H., Gill, J., Kannan, K., Karas, B.J., Ma, L., Pelletier, J.F., Qi, Z.-Q., Richter, R.A., Strychalski, E.A., Sun, L., Suzuki, Y., Tsvetanova, B., Wise, K.S., Smith, H.O., Glass, J.I., Merryman, C., Gibson, D.G., Venter, J.C.: Design and Synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 351(6280), 1414 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karkas, J.D., Rudner, R., Chargaff, E.: Separation of B. subtilis DNA into complementary strands, II. Template functions and Composition as determined by transcription with RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 60, 915–920 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koonin, E.V., Wolf, Y.I.: Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian? Biol. Direct 4, 42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Landrain, T., Meyer, M., Perez, A.M., Sussan, R.: Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement. Syst. Synth. Biol. 7, 115–126 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lartigue, C., Glass, J., Alperovich, N., Pieper, R., Parmar, P.P., Hutchison 3rd, C.A., Smith, H.O., Venter, J.C.: Genome transplantation in bacteria: changing one species to another. Science 317(5838), 632–638 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ledford, H.: Garage biotech: life hackers. Nature 467, 650–652 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matthew, P.: On Naval Timber and Arboriculture; with Critical Notes on Authors Who Have Recently Treated the Subject of Planting. Adam Black, London (1831)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Miescher, F.: Ueber die chemische Zusammensetzung der Eiterzellen. Medicinisch-chemische Unters. 4, 441–460 (1871)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell, D., Bridge, R.: A test of Chargaff’s second rule. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 340, 90–94 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson, J.D.: The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. Atheneum, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Watson, J.D., Crick, F.H.C.: Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 4356, 737 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamagishi, M.E.B. (2017). Introduction. In: Mathematical Grammar of Biology. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62689-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics