• Katrin Blankenburg
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


A recapitulation and reflection on the main findings brings this dissertation to a close and offers researchers as well as practitioners novel and beneficial insights. Also, six contributions to knowledge, further implications to policy and to practice are presented. Since limitations of the research lead to opportunities for further research, both limitations and opportunities are discussed as well.


Resource Dependence Theory Value Creation Process Stakeholder Theory Emotional Story Good Working Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alwert, K., Bornemann, M., & Will, M. (2006). Wissensbilanz – made in Germany. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.Google Scholar
  2. Arvidsson, S. (2011). Disclosure of non-financial information in the annual report: A management-team perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 277–300. doi: 10.1108/14691931111123421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), 234–254. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  4. Bukh, P. N. (2003). The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: A paradox? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(1), 49–56. doi: 10.1108/09513570310464273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. (2002). Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (51st ed.). München: Verlag C.H. Beck oHG im Deutschen Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co KG.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsches Rechnungslegungs Standards Commitee e.V. (2012). Deutscher Rechnungslegungs Standard Nr. 20 (DRS 20) (pp. 1–56). Accessed November 23, 2015, from
  7. Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2015). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: A critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 121–155. doi: 10.1108/JIC-04-2014-0043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumay, J., & Rooney, J. (2011). ‘Measuring for managing?’ An IC practice case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 344–355. doi: 10.1108/14691931111154670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glassman, D. M., & Spahn, K. (2012). Performance measurement for nonprofits. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(2), 72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00381.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gowthorpe, C. (2009). Wider still and wider? A critical discussion of intellectual capital recognition, measurement and control in a boundary theoretical context. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(7), 823–834. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  12. Keehley, P., & Abercrombie, N. N. (2008). Benchmarking in the public and nonprofit sectors (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Kong, E. (2003). Using intellectual capital as a strategic tool for non-profit organisations. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 3(1), 467–474.Google Scholar
  14. Kong, E. (2007a). A review of the strategic management literature: The importance of intellectual capital in the non-profit sector. In 28th McMaster world congress on intellectual capital and innovation (pp. 1–26). Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. doi: 10.1108/14691930710830864.Google Scholar
  15. Kong, E. (2007b). The strategic importance of intellectual capital in the non-profit sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 721–731. doi: 10.1108/14691930710830864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong, E. (2008). The development of strategic management in the non-profit context: Intellectual capital in social service non-profit organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 281–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00224.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong, E. (2010a). Analyzing BSC and IC’s usefulness in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(3), 284–304. doi: 10.1108/14691931011064554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kong, E. (2010b). Intellectual capital and non-profit organizations in the knowledge economy: Editorial and introduction to special issue. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 97–106. doi: 10.1108/14691931011039624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kong, E., & Prior, D. (2008). An intellectual capital perspective of competitive advantage in nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13, 119–128. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis – An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhnle, H., & Banzhaf, J. (2006). Finanzkommunikation unter IFRS. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH.Google Scholar
  22. Möller, K., & Gamerschlag, R. (2009). Immaterielle Vermögenswerte in der Unternehmenssteuerung - betriebswirtschaftliche Perspektiven und Herausforderungen. In K. Möller, M. Piwinger, & A. Zerfaß (Eds.), Immaterielle Vermögenswerte – Bewertung, Berichterstattung und Kommunikation (pp. 3–21). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  23. Nielsen, C., & Madsen, M. T. (2009). Discourses of transparency in the intellectual capital reporting debate: Moving from generic reporting models to management defined information. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(7), 847–854. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  24. Raynard, P. (1998). Coming together. A review of contemporary approaches to social accounting, auditing and reporting in non-profit organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1471–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steenkamp, N., & Northcott, D. (2007). Content analysis in accounting research: The practical challenge. Australian Accounting Review, 17(43), 12–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00332.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van Broekhoven, R. A. (2008). Engaging Donors’ Trust. Accessed February 20, 2014, from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Blankenburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamburg University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations