• Katrin Blankenburg
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


This methodology chapter highlights the underlying considerations of the current research. It starts with a presentation of the research objectives and research questions, followed by an introduction of the research philosophy applied. Next, the influences of the researcher are discussed and finally a reflection on ethical implications offered.


University Ethics Committee Ricceri Including Data Protection Critical Realist Perspective Researcher Requests 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2015). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: A critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 121–155. doi: 10.1108/JIC-04-2014-0043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ethikkommission des Competence Center Gesundheit der HAW Hamburg. (2014). Antrag auf Stellungnahme der Ethikkommission des Competence Centers Gesundheit.Google Scholar
  5. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282–293. doi: 10.1108/14691930410533704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–82. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  7. Kong, E. (2010). Analyzing BSC and IC’s usefulness in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(3), 284–304. doi: 10.1108/14691931011064554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kong, E., & Prior, D. (2008). An intellectual capital perspective of competitive advantage in nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13, 119–128. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayring, P. (1996). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  10. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. Sillanpää, V., Lönnqvist, A., Koskela, N., Koivula, U., Koivuaho, M., & Laihonen, H. (2010). The role of intellectual capital in non-profit elderly care organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 107–122. doi: 10.1108/14691931011039633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Witzel, A., & Reiter, H. (2012). The problem-centred interview. London: SAGE. Accessed February 25, 2014, from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Blankenburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamburg University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations