Impact of Pre-incubators on Entrepreneurial Activities in Turkey: Problems, Successes, and Policy Recommendations

  • Emek Barış Kepenek
  • Zeliha Eser
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)


Entrepreneurship can be considered a driving force for economic growth, employment creation, and competitiveness in societies. However, a crucial issue is the ability to produce knowledge and train a skilled workforce that has a proper entrepreneurial mindset. In this regard, there are three main actors: public governance, universities, and the private sector.

Universities should take more role as both producers and disseminators of knowledge in entrepreneurial activities. The concept of pre-incubation centers, which is the central focus of this paper, is one outcome of such activities.

By providing targeted resources and services, incubation serves as a business-support process that accelerates the successful development of start-ups and companies. Incubation ideas focus on already established firms—either start-up or senior firms; however, pre-incubation centers focus on the early-stage ideas of students and entrepreneurs.

This study addresses the impact of services offered in pre-incubation centers—namely infrastructure, coaching, and business networks—on the graduation rates of incubator participants in Turkey. Based on interview data with 23 of 40 pre-incubation managers, we found that it is necessary to develop synergy among universities and achieve local economic alignment. The educational system should produce individuals with requisite skills: at that point, they can become active in furthering government policies to promote entrepreneurship. In this context, entrepreneurial universities play an important role as both producers and disseminators of knowledge. University-based incubation centers will become key actors for promoting entrepreneurial culture in societies.


Entrepreneurship Incubation Success Policy making 


  1. Amiri SRS, Kavousy E, Husseini AS (2009) Strategies for creating entrepreneur university. Eur J Soc Sci 11(3):496–506Google Scholar
  2. Bathula H, Karia M, Abbott M (2011) The role of university-based incubators in emerging economies. Working paper No: 22, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Transf 36(3):316–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deutschmann M (2007) What difference a ‘Pre’ makes: university business preincubators in Germany. A national survey. Working Paper, Report No: 5. Leuphana University, LueneburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickson A (2004) Pre-incubation and the New Zealand business incubation industry. New Zealand Centre for SME Research, Massey University, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35(12):1504–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EBN (2010) The smart guide to innovation based incubators-IBI.
  8. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national system and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy 29:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29:313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimaldi R, Grandi A (2005) Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation 25(2):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones P, Voisey P, Thomas B (2013) The pre-incubator: a longitudinal study of 10 years of university pre-incubation in Wales. Ind High Educ 27(5):349–363Google Scholar
  12. Kirby DA (2004) Entrepreneurship education and incubators: pre-incubators, incubators and science parks as enterprise laboratories. In: 14th Annual intent conference proceeding, IntEnt University of Napoli Federico II (Italy), 4–7 July, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  13. Kirby AD (2006) Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. J Technol Transf 31:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D (2000) Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus Econ 14:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neuman WL (2006) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th edn. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Pahurkar RN (2015) Creating entrepreneurs through entrepreneurial universities. Management 5(2):48–54Google Scholar
  17. Peters L, Rice M, Sundararajan M (2004) The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. J Technol Transf 29(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stal E, Andreassi T, Fujino A (2016) The role of university incubators in stimulating academic entrepreneurship. Revista de Administração e Inovação 13(2):89–98Google Scholar
  19. USINE, University Start-up of International Entrepreneurs (2002) Available from: Last Accessed 20 Sept 2012
  20. Voisey P, Jones P, Thomas B (2013) The pre-incubator: a longitudinal study of 10 years of university pre-incubation in Wales. Ind High Educ 27(5):349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vonortas N (2017) The role of universities in the knowledge triangle. Foresight STI Gov 11(2):6–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Ekin Pre-Incubation CenterBaskent UniversityBağlıcaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Management and Ekin Pre-Incubation CenterBaskent UniversityBağlıcaTurkey

Personalised recommendations