Entrepreneurial Universities: Towards a Revised Paradigm
This chapter explains the entrepreneurial university concept and its place and role in the triple helix in its entirety. It further elaborates on its implications for university management, departments, faculty members and supporting organizations. Moreover it reflects the meaning of the entrepreneurial university for stakeholders, i.e., university boards, regional and national policy and administrative bodies, funding agencies, the business community, university ranking institutions and the global university community overall. The chapter provides a comprehensive understanding of the entrepreneurial university, which is increasingly important because stakeholders’ expectations towards universities are growing. This in turn leads to increased pressure on universities to move beyond their traditional roles and models towards taking responsibility for economic development, large scale basic education and targeted further education and the development of value from research. These expectations provide opportunities for universities, but impose threats on the existing models and practices. Recent literature on entrepreneurial universities is incomplete and mostly focused on the commercialization of research, technology transfer and the third mission of universities. The article expands the predominant thinking about entrepreneurial universities and gives a broader structured definition.
KeywordsTriple helix Knowledge triangle Entrepreneurial university Industry-science relationships University-industry linkages Open innovation Active innovation
The book chapter was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of the subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.
- Bell E (2010) International capacity building for sustainable growth: what role for the world’s learned societies? Foresight-Russia 4(1):60–63 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Gibb A (2005) Towards the entrepreneurial university – entrepreneurship education as a lever for change. National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship, Policy paper #003, 22 May 2005Google Scholar
- Luger M, Goldstein H (1997) The role of public universities. In: Bingham R, Mier R (eds) Dilemmas of urban economic development. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 104–134Google Scholar
- Meissner D (2014) Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Rev 5(1):34–56Google Scholar
- O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Morse KP, Colm O’GC, Roche F (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Manag 37(1):2007Google Scholar
- OECD (2013) Commercialising public research: new trends and strategies. OECD, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264193321-en. Accessed 17 June 2014
- Pascoe CE, Vonortas NS (2015) University entrepreneurship: a survey of US experience. In: Vonortas NS, Rouge PC, Aridi A (eds) Innovation policy, a practical introduction, SpringerBriefs in entrepreneurship and innovation. Springer, New York, pp 27–46Google Scholar
- Schibany A, Reiner C (2014) Can basic research provide a way out of economic stagnation? Foresight-Russia 8(4):54–63Google Scholar
- Sivak Y, Yudkevich M (2008) Closed academic environment and local academic conventions. Foresight-Russia 2(4):32–41 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Williams T, Vonortas NS (2015) Strategic alliances/knowledge-intensive partnerships. In: Vonortas NS, Rouge PC, Aridi A (eds) Innovation policy, a practical introduction, SpringerBriefs in entrepreneurship and innovation. Springer, New York, pp 47–64Google Scholar