Labour in the Valorisation Process

  • Frederick Harry Pitts
Chapter
Part of the Marx, Engels, and Marxisms book series (MAENMA)

Abstract

Approaching labour as an object of inquiry in light of the New Reading of Marx’s theory of the value-form, this chapter analyses how what goes on in the workplace relates to what goes on in the market. Value assumes a succession of what Richard Gunn calls ‘modes of existence’ in the valorisation process, of which the labour process is just a carrier. This procession of forms is hard to capture in applied social research focused on labour alone. The chapter evaluates how two methods for studying labour and economic life capture value’s ‘non-empirical reality’ – the Italian workers inquiry tradition, and the feminist ‘life trajectory of the commodity’ approach. Encapsulating production and circulation, Chris Arthur’s conceptualisation of ‘practical abstraction’ is proposed as an alternative.

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, T.W. 1974. Commitment. New Left Review I/87-88: 75–89.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1998. The Metaphysics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, C. 2013. The Practical Truth of Abstract Labour. In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse, ed. R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta, and P. Thomas, 101–120. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Aufheben. 2004. We Have Ways of Making You Talk! Aufheben #12. http://libcom.org/library/we-have-ways-making-you-talk. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  5. Bellofiore, R. 2009. A Ghost Turning into a Vampire: The Concept of Capital and Living Labour. In Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives After the Critical Edition, ed. R. Bellofiore and R. Fineschi, 178–194. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellofiore, R., and R. Finelli. 1998. Capital, Labour and Time: The Marxian Monetary Theory of Value as a Theory of Exploitation. In Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal: Essays on Volume 1 of Capital: Method, Value and Money, ed. R. Bellofiore, 48–74. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benyon, H. 1984. Working for Ford. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Bonefeld, W. 2014. Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2016a. Negative Dialectics and Critique of Economic Objectivity. History of the Human Sciences 29 (2): 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2016b. Bringing Critical Theory Back in at a Time of Misery: Three Beginnings Without Conclusion. Capital & Class 40 (2): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, B.A., and A. Quan-Hase. 2012. “A Workers’ Inquiry 2.0”: An Ethnographic Method for the Study of Produsage in Social Media Contexts. tripleC 10 (2): 488–508.Google Scholar
  12. Cavendish, R. 1982. Women on the Line. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cleaver, H. 2000. Reading Capital Politically. Edinburgh: AK Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cockburn, C., and S. Ormrod. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Colletti, L. 1973. Marxism and Hegel. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1989. From Rousseau to Lenin: Studies in Ideology and Society. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Molina, M.M. 2004. Common Notions, Part 1: Workers-Inquiry, Co-research, Consciousness-Raising. Trans. M. Casas-Cortés and S. Cobarrubias. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0406/malo/en. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  18. Elson, D. 1979. The Value Theory of Labour. In Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, ed. D. Elson, 115–180. London: CSE Books.Google Scholar
  19. Endnotes. 2010. Communisation and Value-Form Theory. Endnotes #2: Misery and the Value-Form. https://endnotes.org.uk/issues/2/en/endnotes-communisation-and-value-form-theory. Accessed 29 Oct 2016.
  20. Glucksmann, M. 1990. Women Assemble: Women Workers and the New Industries in Inter-war Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2005. Shifting Boundaries and Interconnections: Extending the ‘Total Social Organisation of Labour’. In A New Sociology of Work? ed. L. Pettinger et al. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Gunn, R. 1989. Marxism and Philosophy: A Critique of Critical Realism. Capital and Class 13: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1992. Against Historical Materialism: Marxism as First-Order Discourse. In Open Marxism Volume II: Theory and Practice, ed. W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn, and K. Psychopedis, 1–45. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heinrich, M. 2012. An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  26. Holloway, J. 2010. Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kolinko. 2002. Hotlines: Call Centre. Inquiry. Communism. Oberhausen: Kolinko.Google Scholar
  28. Marx, K. 1859. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-pol-economy. Accessed 15 July 2012.
  29. ———. 1976. Capital. Vol. I. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1993. Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2013. Workers’ Inquiry. In A Workers’ Inquiry Reader. Assembled to Accompany. The Politics of Workers’ Inquiry Conference, ed. S. Shukaitis, J. Figiel and A. Walker, 8–15. Wivenhoe: Ephemera.Google Scholar
  32. Napoleoni, C. 1975. Smith, Ricardo, Marx. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Negri, A. 2008. Reflections on Empire. Trans. E. Emery. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Panzieri, R. 1965. Socialist Uses of Workers’ Inquiry. Trans. A. Bove. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0406/panzieri/en. Accessed 14 June 2012.
  35. Reuten, G. 2005. Money as Constituent of Value; The Ideal Introversive Substance and the Ideal Extroversive Form of Value in Capital. In Marx’s Theory of Money: Modern Appraisals, ed. F. Moseley, 78–92. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin, I.I. 1972. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1978. Abstract Labour and Value in Marx’s System. Capital & Class 5: 107–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sohn-Rethel, A. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorne, J. 2011. The Workers’ Inquiry: What’s the Point? The commune. May 16. http://thecommune.co.uk/2011/05/16/the-workers%E2%80%99-inquiry-what%E2%.
  40. Uninomade Collective. 2013. The Logistics of Struggles. Notes on the Italian Case. Trans. I. Bonnin. http://www.uninomade.org/the-logistics-of-struggles. Accessed 26 Dec 2013.
  41. Wright, E.O. 1981a. The Value Controversy and Social Research. In The Value Controversy, ed. I. Steedman. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 1981b. Reconsiderations. In The Value Controversy, ed. I. Steedman. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, S. 2002. Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick Harry Pitts
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and ManagementUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations