A Phenomenological Spatial Model for Macro-Ecological Patterns in Species-Rich Ecosystems
Over the last few decades, ecologists have come to appreciate that key ecological patterns, which describe ecological communities at relatively large spatial scales, are not only scale dependent, but also intimately intertwined. The relative abundance of species—which informs us about the commonness and rarity of species—changes its shape from small to large spatial scales. The average number of species as a function of area has a steep initial increase, followed by decreasing slopes at large scales. Finally, if we find a species in a given location, it is more likely we find an individual of the same species close-by, rather than farther apart. Such spatial turnover depends on the geographical distribution of species, which often are spatially aggregated. This reverberates on the abundances as well as the richness of species within a region, but so far it has been difficult to quantify such relationships.
Within a neutral framework—which considers all individuals competitively equivalent—we introduce a spatial stochastic model, which phenomenologically accounts for birth, death, immigration and local dispersal of individuals. We calculate the pair correlation function—which encapsulates spatial turnover—and the conditional probability to find a species with a certain population within a given circular area. Also, we calculate the macro-ecological patterns, which we have referred to above, and compare the analytical formulæ with the numerical integration of the model. Finally, we contrast the model predictions with the empirical data for two lowland tropical forest inventories, showing always a good agreement.
The authors would like to thank the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, for support and hospitality during the programme ‘Stochastic Dynamical Systems in Biology: Numerical Methods and Applications’ where work on this paper was undertaken. This work was supported by EPSRC grant no EP/K032208/1. We are also grateful to the FRIM Pasoh Research Committee (M.N.M. Yusoff, R. Kassim) and the Center for Tropical Research Science (R. Condit, S. Hubbell, R. Foster) for providing the empirical data of the Pasoh and BCI forests, respectively. SA is in debt with Prof. A. Maritan for insightful discussions.
- 6.S. Azaele, S. Suweis, J. Grilli, I. Volkov, J.R. Banavar, A. Maritan, Statistical mechanics of ecological systems: neutral theory and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88(3), 035003 (2016)Google Scholar
- 8.J.H. Brown, Macroecology (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995)Google Scholar
- 9.D.S. Dean, Langevin equation for the density of a system of interacting Langevin processes. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29(24), L613 (1996)Google Scholar
- 10.I. Dornic, H. Chaté, M.A. Munoz, Integration of Langevin equations with multiplicative noise and the viability of field theories for absorbing phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(10), 100601 (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.C.W. Gardiner, M.L. Steyn-Ross, Adiabatic elimination in stochastic systems. II. Application to reaction diffusion and hydrodynamic-like systems. Phys. Rev. A 29(5), 2823 (1984)Google Scholar
- 19.S. Hubbell, The Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001)Google Scholar
- 22.B.J. McGill, R.S. Etienne, J.S. Gray, D. Alonso, M.J. Anderson, H.K. Benecha, M. Dornelas, B.J. Enquist, J.L. Green, F. He, Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 10(10), 995–1015 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.L. Pechenik, H. Levine, Interfacial velocity corrections due to multiplicative noise. Phys. Rev. E 59(4), 3893 (1999)Google Scholar
- 33.N.G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland Personal Library, 3rd edn. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 2007)Google Scholar