Advertisement

The Municipal No to Mining. The Case Concerning the Reopening of the Biedjovaggi Gold Mine in Guovdageainnu Municipality, Norway

  • Tone Magnussen
  • Brigt Dale
Chapter
Part of the Springer Polar Sciences book series (SPPS)

Abstract

In 2012, the municipal council of the predominantly Sami community of Guovdageainnu (Kautokeino) rejected a proposal to reopen the Biedjovaggi gold mine. Through an analysis of interviews, conversations, media and relevant grey literature and official documents, this chapter investigates how the decision by the Guovdageainnu municipal council to reject the application was based on a firm conviction that a sustainable future for the predominantly Sami community was closely tied to the survival of the reindeer herding industry. In this context, the term ‘sustainable’ refers to a large extent to the ontological security that herding provides for the Sami people, as a major carrier of cultural identity and a sense of belonging in this particular landscape. Thus, the potential benefits that may be generated by a mine were considered by a majority of Municipal Council members not to be sufficient to risk the potential consequences these activities could have for the reindeer and the herders. The political decisions by individual actors and public sentiments on the matter were also informed by a broader, culturally embedded rationale reflecting a deep concern about connections to place, space(s) and practices considered vital for Saami identity.

Keywords

Landscape value Indigenous issues Reindeer herding Mining Ontological security 

References

  1. Abram, S., & Lien, M. (2011). Performing nature at world’s ends. ETHOS: Journal of Anthropology, 76(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  2. Balto, A. M., & Østmo, L. (2012). Multicultural studies from a Sami perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 22(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Benediktsson, K., & Lund, K. A. (Eds.). (2010). Conversations with landscape. London: Ashgate e-book.Google Scholar
  4. Blaser, M. (2009). Political ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dale, B. (2011). Securing a contingent future: How threats, risks and identity matter in the debate over petroleum development in Lofoten, Norway. Department of Sociology, Political Science and Community Planning. Tromsø, University of Tromsø. PhD.Google Scholar
  6. Dale, B. (2016). Governing resources, governing mentalities. Petroleum and the Norwegian integrated ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents and Lofoten seas in 2011. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  7. Eidheim, H. (1969). In F. Barth (Ed.), When ethnic identity is a social stigma. Ethnic groups and boundaries. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  8. Eidheim, H. (1987). Aspects of the Lappish minority situation. Oslo: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  9. Eira, Inger Marie Gaup., et al. (2016). Reindrift, makt og myter. I: Samisk reindrift – Norske myter. Fagbokforlaget 2016 ISBN 9788245017519. s. 9–26.Google Scholar
  10. Førde, A., & Magnussen T. (2015). Invaded by weeds; contested landscape studies. Geografiska Annalar, Series B, Human Geography, 97 Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (2010). The government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Greve, A. (2014). Sårbarhet og glede. Et bidrag til stedets filosofi. Vit at jeg elsker deg – om kunst og sted. H. Stien. Stamsund, Orkana.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, R. L., & Maurer, K. (2011). ‘You fix my community, you have fixed my life’: The disruption and rebuilding of ontological security in New Orleans. Disasters, 35(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2011, 2000). The temporality of landscapes. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Ingold, T. (2000). Perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, A. (1987). Anthropology at home. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  19. Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability, Engineering and System Safety, 59, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jernsletten, J. L. (2009). Bissie davje. Relasjoner mellom folk og landskap i Voengel-Hjaarke sïjte. Tromsø, University of Tromsø. PhD.Google Scholar
  21. Johnsen, K. I., et al. (2015). Seeing like the state or like pastoralists? Conflicting narratives on the governance of Sámi reindeer husbandry in Finnmark, Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Jonsson, G., et al. (2012). Too hot for the reindeer – voicing Sámi children’s visions of the future. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Josefsen, E. (2014). Selvbestemmelse og samstyring – en studie av Sametingets plasss i politiske prosesser i Norge. Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning. Tromsø, UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet. PhD.Google Scholar
  24. Koivurova, T., et al. (2015). Legal protection of Sami traditional livelihoods from the adverse impacts of mining: A comparison of the level of protection enjoyed by Sami in Their Four Home States. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 6(0)Google Scholar
  25. Kristoffersen, B. and B. Dale (2014). Post-petroleum security in Lofoten: Why identity matters. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 5(2)Google Scholar
  26. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Marlow, J. (2002). Governmentality, ontological security and ideational stability: Preliminary observations on the manner, ritual and logic of a particular art of government. Journal of Political Ideologies, 7(2), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordø, Å., et al. (2015). Den samiske medborgeren. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.Google Scholar
  29. Nygaard, V. (2016). Do indigenous interests have a say in planning of new mining Projects? Experiences from Finnmark, Norway. Journal of Extractive Industries and Society Fortcoming (Special issue).Google Scholar
  30. Olwig, K. R. (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(4), 630–653Google Scholar
  31. Oskal, N. (1995). Det rette, det gode og reinlykken, University of Tromsø. PhD.Google Scholar
  32. Ostrom, E. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabinow, P. (1986). Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ravna, Ø. (2011). The process of identifying land rights in parts of Northern Norway: Does the Finnmark act prescribe an adequate procedure within the National Law? *. Yearbook of Polar Law, 3, 423–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riabova, L. and V. Didyk (2014). Social license to operate for mining companies in the Russian arctic: Two cases in the Murmansk Region. Arctic Yearbook.Google Scholar
  36. Riseth, J. Å. (2013). Reindrifta i Nord-Norge. Fra vikeplikt til bærekraft? Hvor går Nord-Norge? Politiske tidslinjer. S. Jentoft, J.-I. Nergård and K. A. Rørvik. Stamsund, Orkana. 1.Google Scholar
  37. Sara, M. N. (2011). Land usage and Siida autonomy. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 3(2), 138–158.Google Scholar
  38. Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539–556.Google Scholar
  39. Skogvang, S. F. (2010). Ny minerallov og samiske rettigheter. Lov og rett, 49(1–2), 47–67.Google Scholar
  40. Tuusjärvi, M., et al. (2014). Mining industry in Finland – development scenarios to 2030. Journal of Cleaner Production, xxx(xxx), 1–10.Google Scholar
  41. Uxeküll, J. v. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Distinctive behaviour: The development of a modern concept. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  42. Venn, C. (2007). Cultural theory, biopolitics, and the question of power. Theory Culture Society, 24, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, E. (2015). Energy and minerals in Greenland. Governance, corporate responsibility and social resilience, International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  44. Wylie, J. (2003). Landscape, performance and dwelling: A Glastonbury case study. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 136–157). Pearson: Essex.Google Scholar
  45. Wylie, J. (2007). Landscape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nordland Research InstituteBodøNorway

Personalised recommendations