You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Representations of classroom practice offer the chance of referring to the teachers’ professional environment both when conceiving opportunities of professional development and when investigating aspects of teacher expertise. Representations of practice can stimulate teachers’ criteria-based analysis in environments that do not bring the full pressure and action constraints of the actual classroom. In professional development and in research, approaches which use representations of practice offer prospects and encounter challenges which can be explored along the following key questions: How can representations of practice encourage pre-service and in-service teacher professional development, e.g. through stimuli for reflection, criteria-based analysis, or structured observation? How can representations of practice help to investigate aspects of teacher expertise, such as e.g. criteria-based aspects of noticing or analyzing? What kinds of methodological challenges emerge when designing opportunities for professional learning, which make use of representations of practice? How can these challenges be addressed? What methodological challenges emerge when designing research settings based on representations of practice? How can these challenges be addressed?
By aspects of teacher expertise which can be in the scope of empirical research, we mean—an understanding which is as open and inclusive as possible—teacher characteristics which may be meaningful for supporting students’ learning, such as, components of professional knowledge of mathematics teachers, views and convictions (e.g. Shulman, 1986; Ball, Thames, & Phelps, 2008; Kuntze, 2012), competence facets such as “professional vision” (Sherin & van Es, 2009), “noticing” in the sense of “selective attention” (cf. e.g. Seidel, Blomberg, & Renkl, 2013) or in the sense of “knowledge-based reasoning” (Sherin, Jacobs, & Philipp, 2011), as well as the notion of “awareness” (Mason, 2002), and specific competences of analyzing classroom situations (e.g. Kuntze, Dreher, & Friesen, 2015). Opportunities and challenges related to the use of representations of practice for supporting aspects of teacher expertise have been explored in an ICME discussion group with contributions from Orly Buchbinder, Dan Chazan, Anika Dreher, Marita Friesen, Jessica Hoth, Sebastian Kuntze, Nanette Seago, Karen Skilling & Gabriel Stylianides, Corey Webel, Bill Zahner, and Rina Zazkis. Joint publications related to the theme of this discussion group are planned for the near future.
References
Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Kuntze, S. (2012). Pedagogical content beliefs: Global, content domain-related and situation-specific components. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 273–292.
Kuntze, S., Dreher, A., & Friesen, M. (2015). Teachers’ resources in analysing mathematical content and classroom situations. CERME 9.
Mason, J. (2002). Minding your Qs and Rs: Effective questioning and responding in the mathematics classroom. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp. 248–258). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65.
Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing. New York: Routledge.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access Except where otherwise noted, this chapter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kuntze, S., Buchbinder, O., Webel, C., Dreher, A., Friesen, M. (2017). Using Representations of Practice for Teacher Education and Research—Opportunities and Challenges. In: Kaiser, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_98
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_98
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62596-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62597-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)