Advertisement

An Exergy Analysis of a Laboratory Scale Fast Pyrolysis Process Design

  • Muthasim Fahmy
  • In-Gu Lee
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

An exergy analysis is carried out on a laboratory scale fast pyrolysis process. Mass balance and key compositional data are obtained from a lab scale plant operating at a biomass feed rate of approximately 1 kg/h. Exergy flows and losses are determined for the overall system, as well as the main subsystems, and the sensitivity of the exergy efficiency to reactor temperature and biomass feed moisture content is investigated. The optimal operating temperature for the reactor is within the approximate range 426–457 °C, providing a rational exergy efficiency of approximately 30%. The main exergy losses are found to be associated with the combination of the fluidised bed reactor and the char separation cyclone. The water-chilled condensers used to quench pyrolysis gases and to separate bio-oil are found to be the second largest source of exergy loss, primarily through irreversible exergy destruction and via noncondensable gas products. It is also estimated that increasing the moisture content of the feedstock will decrease the exergy efficiency of the overall system by about 2% for every weight percentage increase in feedstock moisture content.

Keywords

Exergy analysis Fast pyrolysis Biofuel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the International Research Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea Government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. This work was also supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment via Scion Core Funding. The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael Jack (University of Otago) for his contributions to the ongoing collaboration between KIER and Scion and to Pierre Grange (Scion) for his assistance with this work.

References

  1. Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., Moran, M.J.: Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  2. Bridgwater, A.: IEA bioenergy update 27: biomass pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy. 31, 1–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgwater, A., Meier, D., Radlein, D.: An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org. Geochem. 30, 1479–1493 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornelissen, R. L.: Thermodynamics and sustainable development; the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility. PhD. Thesis, Universiteit Twente (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Gaggioli, R.A.: Thermodynamics: Second Law Analysis. Amer Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghannadzadeh, A., Thery-Hetreux, R., Baudouin, O., Baudet, P., Floquet, P., Joulia, X.: General methodology for exergy balance in ProSimPlus process simulator. Energy. 44, 38–59 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hurst Jr., J.E., Harrison, B.K.: Estimation of liquid and solid heat capacities using a modified Kopp’s rule. Chem. Eng. Commun. 112, 21–30 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kotas, T.J.: The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. Krieger, Malabar (1995)Google Scholar
  9. McBride, B.J., Gordon, S., Reno, M.A.: Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Individual Species, p. 1. NASA Technical Memorandum, Hampton (1993)Google Scholar
  10. Moran, M.J., Shapiro, H.N.: Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Piekarczyk, W., Czarnowska, L., Ptasiński, K., Stanek, W.: Thermodynamic evaluation of biomass-to-biofuels production systems. Energy. 62, 95–104 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Querol, E., Gonzalez-Regueral, B., Perez-Benedito, J.L.: Practical Approach to Exergy and Thermoeconomic Analyses of Industrial Processes. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Radlein, D., Quignard, A.: A short historical review of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 68, 765–783 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shieh, J., Fan, L.: Estimation of energy (enthalpy) and exergy (availability) contents in structurally complicated materials. Energy Sources. 6, 1–46 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simpson, W., TenWolde, A.: Physical Properties and Moisture Relations of Wood. Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, Madison (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Sohel, M.I., Jack, M.W.: Thermodynamic analysis of lignocellulosic biofuel production via a biochemical process: guiding technology selection and research focus. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 2617–2622 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sohel, M.I., Jack, M.W.: Thermodynamic analysis of a high-yield biochemical process for biofuel production. Bioresour. Technol. 124, 406–412 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Szargut, J.: Chemical exergies of the elements. Appl. Energy. 32, 269–286 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsatsaronis, G.: Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of energy systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 19, 227–257 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ScionRotoruaNew Zealand
  2. 2.Biomass and Waste Energy Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy ResearchDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations